StormBreaker
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2019
- Messages
- 5,448
- Reaction score
- 16
- Country
- Location
Sir, You are right in that.Hi,
After their forefathers built the ties---now it is our turn to build the ties---.
Saudi royals do care---it is pakistan who has fckd up bad for the last 6-7 years---.
We were given enough chances to retain and take charge of the geographic area---. It is us who rejected them---.
However, the last 6 years, we can’t blame Pakistan Alone, death of King Abdullah, came in Salman, initiated yemen conflict and then came in MBS, the fostering of USA to KSA grew to new heights, it is as if MBS is an ambassador of USA, Previous kings weren’t that tough with Pakistan in dealing, the current Prince is a clever one, either is dictated directly by US or himself plays with Pakistan tough, giving narrow path to Pakistan in getting along with their conditions.
Come to Trump, and last years of Obama, and the influence of Indian Congress, The relations between Pak and USA went very down, as if just like any other country. Zarb e azb hurt US the most, and the fencing of torkhum and the Fall of TTP. USA lost much of its interest in Pakistan, China jumped in, finally signed CPEC, this further hurt the ties between Pak and USA. The ever growing Pak China relation, an the USA-Ksa relations, are the reason why it is getting tough for Pak and KSA to get along now, one can simply call KSA as USA.
Had Pakistan entered Yemen, China might have withdrew from CPEC, ME wouldn’t have invested that amount in infrastructure as China has done just to repay for Yemen.
Just my thoughts.
I am more interested to see what happens of Pak-Iran relations, especially if we see a regime change in iran which is not going to happen anytime soon.
@Mangus Ortus Novem @aliyusuf
PM and FM aren’t on the same page, that is why Imran Khan is being negatively portrayed due to his stances and unthought conversations, speaking anything to foreign persons that comes in his mind.Basically SA & its leadership looks at its own interest (tbh anyone should or would). But the think is that they have trapped themselves with that one issue of Khishougi & are now being blackmailed through it. Anything contrary to US or Israel interest & there will be trouble. India obviously uses Israel to get what it wants.
In current scenario, it will be very difficult to have SA truly in Pak corner. So looking at those constraints, perhaps Pak state has decided to do what is best for it in current scenario. We will still play a bridge gap & at large a neutral role but have to look at Pak interest first.
Statement of IK in Malaysia was not an off the cuff or ill thought remark imo. It seemed done with & after deliberation. Probably we already got signals that we will not be getting what we wanted wrt the OIC thing (despite being promised earlier when we pulled out of Malaysia summit).
Slightly digressing but i feel like the FO particularly SMQ seem to be more pro or more like more pandering to the ME & Gulf (& probably & likely even to US, allies etc.). Maybe SMQ is still jockeying for PMship knowing these are traditionally the main power brokers and international establishment players when it comes to Pakistan.
Pak state as whole i think though will likely want its interests to be put first and maintain a more neutral & binding approach.