What's new

Whatever

Nafsiati masla hai is jamahir loser ka.

Don't you think it's time for you to post yet another snaky pictorial about Socialism or Communism that you have done already ?

There are 1.4 billion people in China. Of course, some people will support Gaddafi and Chavez.

Still, your detailed opinion about that is... ? Surely there are Chinese in various bureaucratic, media and military agencies who are ideologically Communist / Leftist.

bc intnay time se ek hi cheez pe atka hua hai banda, worst part is.. he's blind and does not see that there is zero support for any of his ideas.
Wasting entire life over lost causes makes one a loser, wouldn't you agree?

Here's a Russian site that was created in 2011 :

In late 2011 or in 2012 there was a picture of Gennady Zyuganov, the long-time leader of the Russian Communist party, attending a demonstration probably in Moscow and the demo primarily being organized by the exilees from Libya. You see the connections ?

Communism is eternal. What was there in Libya had some elements of Communism, what is there in various combinations in Venezuela, Cuba, Syria, DPRK and Algeria have all to be enhanced and spread.
 
FGFwYqSXwAo7OU_
 
@SIPRA @Mentee @peagle @Ace of Spades @vi-va @Blacklight

Now listen to this good Indian... I mean the different realities the good Indians can live at the same time is mind-bending...

If we believe it to be true then why do Indians claim that they are a match for China on LCA @Shotgunner51

Enjoy!


Bro, you must have been bored to death to have watched anything from this channel. Although, there's a part of me that finds her plenty sexy, in a very raw way lol

Regarding the heading, I 100% agree with her and all Indians, China is nation of single child cowards, and Pakistan is an Ant, that can be crushed in a millisecond. Please, please do not destroy their fantasy.
 
But regardless, there are high chances of that happening especially in the olden times. It was favorable for the people to have the same faith as the king. I have already posted a screenshot where Aurangzeb imposed additional taxes on Hindus so as to convert them Islam. The poor people care about their daily bread and family than their faith. Plenty of examples where Hindu kings were given additional lands on converting to Islam, which in turn resulted in some conversion of the local people.

But like what Muslims were in SC for atleast 800 years and how many people converted during that time- minority

So to say in last 200 odd years Hindus would have been converted is a bit odd (majority in SC)

I think mods deleted the thread about why did you convert? (the question itself was a bit trollish) but you'd be surprised in the responses bunch of people were so recent that they could trace it back (which means people were converting even under British, Sikh, Hindu Kingdom times)

Personally even I can also trace it back on my family charts as it's written

It was during Sikh time and he was a Hindu- so this whole conversion thing is very nuanced - you can't paint it from just one brush

I have a feeling that you're a marahati but you should look into jutt/jat/jatt history and why were they converting

As Sikh/Muslims form a big part of that clan
You'll see another angle of discrimination which culminated in Sikhism and Islam through shrines
Conversions in SC shouldn't be painted with broad brushes
 
Last edited:
But like what Muslims were in SC for atleast 800 years and how many people converted during that time- minority
A substantial minority I would say if you include Muslims of Bangladesh and Pakistan. Still much better than the whole of subcontinent getting converted if you compare to what happened to Persia, North Africa, Spain and Portugal (in the earlier stage) and other places.
So to say in last 200 odd years Hindus would have been converted is a bit odd (majority in SC)
Another 200 years of Muslim rule could certainly have added more converts, I'm sure. Maybe not the whole subcontinent because UP and Bihar who were under Muslim rule for more number of years are still majority Hindu whereas present day Pakistan and Bangladesh is entirely Muslim. Hard to say but certainly more, no doubt about that.
I think mods deleted the thread about why did you convert? (the question itself was a bit trollish) but you'd be surprised in the responses bunch of people were so recent that they could trace it back (which means people were converting even under British, Sikh, Hindu Kingdom times)
Of course, having a Muslim king is not the only reason but it's an important coefficient to the equation eg. Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Personally even I can also trace it back on my family charts as it's written

It was during Sikh time and he was a Hindu- so this whole conversion thing is very nuanced - you can't paint it from just one brush
Interesting. I've heard there was a lot of syncretism between the practice of Hindus and Muslims of your region even after conversions.
I have a feeling that you're a marahati but you should look into jutt/jat/jatt history and why were they converting

As Sikh/Muslims form a big part of that clan



You'll see another angle of discrimination which culminated in Sikhism and Islam through shrines
Agreed, there are multiple reasons for the conversions. As you mentioned, through Sufis is another factor but through conquest as well where Muslim authors themselves talk about conversion of local populace after battles, demolition of temples, etc. Another problem was that Hindus didn't allow reconverts during that time but there are certainly instances of Muslims reconverting to Hinduism. The founders of the Vijaynagar empire, Harihara Raya and Bukka Raya had converted to Islam and then reconverted to Hinduism.

I don't know too much about Jat history, I'll admit. But there are still plenty of Hindu Jats and there was a Hindu Jat dynasty, Raja Surajmal being a prominent one who had considerable influence in North India. Present day Pakistan is also very close to Afghanistan and Central Asia and hence had considerable Muslim influence since all of Central Asia and Afghanistan became Muslim.

According to the man in the video, if we go by his logic, India should have become Muslim long back. So I don't agree with him.

I had seen a video where an elderly Rajput talked how some Rajputs became Muslim but I'm not able to find it. Will share once I find.
But like what Muslims were in SC for atleast 800 years
Muslims ruling the entire SC for 800 years is inaccurate, I would say. There were plenty of Hindu principalities who were either entirely independent or they just gave nominal authority to the Sultanates/Mughals.
 
Last edited:
Old, as you might have guessed.

Just today, cold. It's freezing. This old bag of Bengali bones is hurting all over.

Dada take care of yourself. We have you in mind and are all rooting for your prosperity and health.

Best wishes for the new year. :-)

নতুন বছরের আন্তরিক শুভকামনা রইলো আপনার আর প্রিয়জনদের জন্য। :-)
Hello @Joe Shearer sir, how have you been ?

Greetings of a happy 2022 @jamahir bhai! :-)
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom