...moreover, I don't think that only Abrahamic religions have socialist aspects, if you're willing to search with an open mind, you'll find many in other faiths and beliefs as well.........
1. buddha also can be called a early socialist, but he did not propose practical solutions to remove misery.
2. guru nanak and true sikhism is also early socialism.
3. so would it be in other cultures... it is easy to recognize what is socialism, yes??
but the point is, you said you prefer a socialist and irreligious(if that is the meaning of 'post-religion') world...
"post-religion" i use from the point of view of present times... i mean removal of mysticisms like prayer, faith, fate, rituals, fastings, festivals, miracles etc... i mean compulsory belief in only.. (a). the sacred-ness of human justice/freedoms, (b). sacred-ness of humans living in gentle harmony with ecology ( example, respect to cats and eradication of dogs ), (c). belief in the existence of the
scientific supreme-ness of nature ( space, universe, local ecologies ) which cannot be described in human-imagined forms.
anything else apart from the above should not be allowed... and to demonstrate their validity, i volunteer mujhaidind to drink glass of cholera or ebola and told to survive only through prayers, moralistic nonsense and dress code... all of which he does fanatically... a good exercise this will be...
...then you cannot connect any religion to socialism even if it may have some socialist aspects...
there will be some cultural continuations like names of people, names of places and music styles... but those can be simply cultural and nothing to do with the historic religious background of those historical names or styles.
