What will happen if China and India switch their global position?

[ChineseTiger1986]

A mistake from anyone can jeopardize their dreams to be number one... I always prefer to resolve issues... first priority should be talks... although I don't agree with you where you are saying that what I have listed in my post is pretty much the current strategy of China... We all know that how our beloved brother wants us to get doomed... they did not let any chance to unstable our nation... China still using them against us and US...

Since the US is the biggest barrier for our freedom, and i won't mind to share the World with Russia/India and the rests of the World after its downfall.

Since to be the World's only Hyperpower is really lonely and boring.

 

[Novice09]

Because Non Violence is in our blood, we dont harm anyone.

We should follow Lord Krishna's teachings... we know a line "majboori ka naam Mahatma Gandhi"... Greatly told by Shri Ramdhari Singh Dinkar Ji...

Forgiveness of a weakling does not count. First have the power and capability to defeat the enemy, then only your offer of peace would carry weight. Virtues of forgiveness, kindness and tolerance are appreciated in society only if you first have the capacity to crush.

Go Through the poem Shakti Aur Kshma

Shakti Aur Kshma:Ramdhari Singh Dinkar,'Contemplations, Inspirational' Poems by Ramdhari Singh Dinkar,Ramdhari Singh Dinkar, Ramdhari Singh Dinkar - Great Indian Poet, Hindi Kavita, strength and forgiveness, strong, power, mahabharat, ram, sea, varun

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

you are wrong here.punjab and sindh acount for the 80%population of pakistan.punjabis and sindhis are the same people as north and west indians.
Indians and Pakistanis have the same Y-chromosome haplogroup. We have the same genetic sequence and the same genetic marker (namely: M124). We have the same DNA molecule, the same DNA sequence. Our culture, our traditions and our cuisine are all the same. We watch the same movies and sing the same songs.so indians and pakistanis are the same race.

an overwhelming majority of pakistani muslims are converted hindus.the only difference is the religion.

Overall, i think Indians are Indid with a strong Dravidian influence, and Pakistanis are Indid with a good amount of Iranid influence in its western population.

 

[53fd]

you are wrong here.punjab and sindh acount for the 80%population of pakistan.punjabis and sindhis are the same people as north and west indians.
Indians and Pakistanis have the same Y-chromosome haplogroup. We have the same genetic sequence and the same genetic marker (namely: M124). We have the same DNA molecule, the same DNA sequence. Our culture, our traditions and our cuisine are all the same. We watch the same movies and sing the same songs.so indians and pakistanis are the same race.

an overwhelming majority of pakistani muslims are converted hindus.the only difference is the religion.

Punjab & Sindh account for about 65-70% of the population, whereas 30-35% of the population comes from KPK, Balochistan & Gilgit-Baltistan. These people have no connection to India, whereas they have deep historical roots & connections with the historical 'Khorasan', present day Afghanistan, Iran, even Tajikistan & China. Then there is immense migration from Balochistan-KPK to Punjab-Sindh as well, for better job opportunities.

The Indus river is the dividing point, if you go on the Western side of the Indus river, they basically have no connection to India, & even Afghanistan claims the regions West of the Indus river to be part of Afghanistan. Pakistan is a multi-ethnic society, some people have connections to India, many don't. Pakistan basically comprises of Aryans, whereas while there is a little Aryan influence in Northern India, there is much more of a Dravidian influence there, which is much lesser in Pakistan. All of Pakistan belongs to the Indus Valley Civilization, most of India does not belong to it.

 

[Novice09]

The US is the biggest barrier for our freedom, and i won't mind to share the World with Russia/India and the rests after its downfall.

Since to be the World's only Hyperpower is really lonely and boring.

Downfall is inevitable... its the nature... timelines could be questioned...

 

[PARAS]

Punjab & Sindh account for about 65-70% of the population, whereas 30-35% of the population comes from KPK, Balochistan & Gilgit-Baltistan. These people have no connection to India, whereas they have deep historical roots & connections with the historical 'Khorasan', present day Afghanistan, Iran, even Tajikistan & China. Then there is immense migration from Balochistan-KPK to Punjab-Sindh as well, for better job opportunities.

The Indus river is the dividing point, if you go on the Western side of the Indus river, they basically have no connection to India, & even Afghanistan claims the regions West of the Indus river to be part of Afghanistan. Pakistan is a multi-ethnic society, some people have connections to India, many don't. Pakistan basically comprises of Aryans, whereas while there is a little Aryan influence in Northern India, there is much more of a Dravidian influence there, which is much lesser in Pakistan. All of Pakistan belongs to the Indus Valley Civilization, most of India does not belong to it.

the parts of pakistan west of indus river were annexed by britishers from iran and afghanistan.most of punjabis and sindhis are converted hindus which can be traced back to their genes.and its wrong that north indians have more dravidian influence.there is almost no dravidian influence in north india.dravidians are centred in central deccan and southern india.the ancient name of north india was aryawarta which means the abode of aryans in sanskrit.

the people of indus valley civilisation were vedic people, not mohammadans.so it automatically implies that the muslims east of indus are converted.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

the parts of pakistan west of indus river were annexed by britishers from iran and afghanistan.most of punjabis and sindhis are converted hindus which can be traced back to their genes.and its wrong that north indians have more dravidian influence.there is almost no dravidian influence in north india.dravidians are centred in central deccan and southern india.the ancient name of north india was aryawarta which means the abode of aryans in sanskrit.

the people of indus valley civilisation were vedic people, not mohammadans.so it automatically implies that the muslims east of indus are converted.

But the nothern Indians are not purely Aryans either, since lord Buddha was from the Northeast, who may have a strong Mongoloid Kirat influence as well.

 

[53fd]

the parts of pakistan west of indus river were annexed by britishers from iran and afghanistan.most of punjabis and sindhis are converted hindus which can be traced back to their genes.and its wrong that north indians have more dravidian influence.there is almost no dravidian influence in north india.dravidians are centred in central deccan and southern india.the ancient name of north india was aryawarta which means the abode of aryans in sanskrit.

the people of indus valley civilisation were vedic people, not mohammadans.so it automatically implies that the muslims east of indus are converted.

Most of the people were converted into Hinduism as well when the Vedas were first written in Pakistan 5000 years ago. Hinduism was not the starting point for the region. There was conversion from Hinduism to Islam as well with the Aryan invasion. The Aryans intermingled with Dravidians over time. I would categorize Pakistan's Sindh-Punjab & Northern India as Aryan-Dravidian mix, South India & Central Deccan as pure Dravidian, & Western Pakistan as pure Aryan. Yes, the people of the IVC were originally Vedic, but there was life in the region before Hinduism came into the region as well.

 

[Kazhugu]

Virtues of forgiveness, kindness and tolerance are appreciated in society only if you first have the capacity to crush.[/I]

Well said!!!

Overall, i think Indians are Indid with a strong Dravidian influence, and Pakistanis are Indid with a good amount of Iranid influence in its western population.

there is no such thing as aryan and dravidian in the context of ethnicity....its purely a linguistic grouping....but then as they say stereotypes are hard to break....

But the nothern Indians are not purely Aryans either, since lord Buddha is from the Northeast, who may have a strong Mongoloid Kirat influence as well.

Lord Buddah was from lumbini on the Indo-Nepal border....no chance of him being a mongoloid...

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Lord Buddah was from lumbini on the Indo-Nepal border....no chance of him being a mongoloid...

On the Nepalese side of the border.

 

[Kazhugu]

Most of the people were converted into Hinduism as well when the Vedas were first written in Pakistan 5000 years ago. Hinduism was not the starting point for the region. There was conversion from Hinduism to Islam as well with the Aryan invasion. The Aryans intermingled with Dravidians over time. I would categorize Pakistan's Sindh-Punjab & Northern India as Aryan-Dravidian mix, South India & Central Deccan as pure Dravidian, & Western Pakistan as pure Aryan. Yes, the people of the IVC were originally Vedic, but there was life in the region before Hinduism came into the region as well.

1) there is no well defined "starting point of hinduism".
2) there was no pakistan 5000 years ago.
3)there is no proof that vedas were written in areas that constitute modern day pakistan
4)there is no such things as aryan,dravidian ethnicity..they are linguistic terms

---------- Post added at 09:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:34 AM ----------

On the Nepalese side of the border.

there was no nepal in 500 bc and it was just bharat varsha stretching from afghanistan to north east india......

lord buddha's kingdom straddled both present day nepal and india....

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Lord Buddah was from lumbini on the Indo-Nepal border....no chance of him being a mongoloid...

Can you picture lord Buddha's closest racial phenotype from a modern Bollywood guy?

 

[Kazhugu]

Can you picture lord Buddha's closest racial phenotype from a modern Bollywood guy?

its like asking a photo of jesus christ or muahmmed.....sorry I cant comment....

he was a hindu kshatriya..thats what id know of Siddhartha (Buddha)

 

[53fd]

1) there is no well defined "starting point of hinduism".
2) there was no pakistan 5000 years ago.
3)there is no proof that vedas were written in areas that constitute modern day pakistan
4)there is no such things as aryan,dravidian ethnicity..they are linguistic terms

Hinduism originated from the region known as present day Pakistan. It is an established fact that the Vedas were written in the region today known as present day Pakistan: the earliest verses of Rig-Veda were written in the Indus Valley of Pakistan. Hinduism has its origins 5000 years ago, & there are countless works written by Western historians & others (except Indian ones) about the Aryan Dravidian history. Furthermore, the Harappans and Rigvedic Aryans were NOT Hindus.

 

[King123]

On the Nepalese side of the border.

Nepal was part of India at that time and when When he was in Lumbini, He was Hindu King. He become Buddhist in Bodhgaya (present India) and religion spereded by King Ashoka (who was another Hindu and we call him Ashoka the great).