What's new

What? Nobel Peace Prize awarded to European Union

Cool. Deserved I think. Since the world wars we've really changed things and now we only ever hate each other when we're playing football.
 
.
[:::~Spartacus~:::];3495826 said:
for the first time a jew has stood aganst the american propaganda organisation and yiu are already on him :cheesy:

he is butthurt! and you need to cry moar!
 
.
Explains...

label.jpg
 
.
Look at me "I have created the worlds most prestigious award and the award goes to me Me me me Me" :rofl:
What a bunch of narcissistic morons!
 
. . .
Who made this comment?

I am not talking about societies. I am talking about reasons why EU does not deserve the peace prize. Some of those reasons are racism, anti-semitism, anti-muslim hatred amongst other things.



I think you misunderstood ?. Race is a purely western concept. That is why the western world is plagued with racism. In India for example, we dont recognize race. You wont even find race and ethnicity questions anywhere even for job applications. Am sure same is the case with Pakistan. And the conflicts in South Asia dont have anything to do with race. It doesnt even figure in the argument, nor is it important. Its border disputes, regional politics etc., But this is not in discussion here. Lets not digress.

My whole point is that Europe categorically does not deserve a peace prize. Its not very peaceful. And when those countries indulge in actual human rights abuses in the middle east, they shouldnt be given that prize. Anyway, it just leads the world to think less and less of the nobel peace prize. Its ridiculous.

Really? You constantly see threads here about skin color and chaste sytem, race and IQ. I guess that must be a different South Asia. India is rather racially homogenious, its ethnic groups that are discriminated against. We hear so often of the dreaded Dalits.

And race is not a Westen concept any more than biological classification is a western concept.

The point once again: Europe has managed to unite into a peaceful economic unit, putting aside their differences. Something India has failed to do with its neighbors.

Your whole argument is based off an unachieveble utopia. Racism/ethnocentrism always exits, and certainly does so in India.
I still believe compared to North America, Asia, Latin America; Europe has the highest living standards, and tries the best to give its immigrants/minorities rights.

Something the Arabs, Chinese, Japanese, Iranians lag behind in.

Anyway, If Europe had less muslims, Jews, like they do in East Asia, it would have been more peaceful.
 
. .
Look at me "I have created the worlds most prestigious award and the award goes to me Me me me Me" :rofl:
What a bunch of narcissistic morons!

Well you are here talking about them. Do you think they talk about South Asia as much as you do about them and the "west?"
 
. .
Looks like geography is not your strong point. Here, have a drawing in colors and with the written country names on display, kiddo.

flag.gif


Dumbass.:agree:
Nobel awards were instituted by Alfred Nobel who was Sweedish not Norwegian. Next time pay attention in history class to avoid looking like a brainless klutz.:woot:

Well you are here talking about them. Do you think they talk about South Asia as much as you do about them and the "west?"
No they dont talk about south asia. They live in south asia as imperialist agressors? I hope details are not required.:azn:
 
.
Next year,they should give it to Al-Qaeda.After all,they have fought all these years with 'infidels' to start a peaceful empire.
We shouldn't be surprised if they do it next year.Noble peace prize sucks.

Let's not forget Netanyahu, that man certainly deserves one.
 
.
Thats Sweeden not Norway. So whose the ignorant fool now?:cheesy: Loser!

Norway is responsible for the peace prize I think.

Really? You constantly see threads here about skin color and chaste sytem, race and IQ. I guess that must be a different South Asia. India is rather racially homogenious, its ethnic groups that are discriminated against. We hear so often of the dreaded Dalits.

First off, the caste system is not based on skin color, unlike concepts of race.

Second, PDF is not representative of South Asia.

Third, Race and IQ posts are purely western phenomenon. People just post links to articles and discuss on it.

Lastly, India is NOT racially homogeneous. BTW I dont believe in concepts of race, AT ALL, so you could say you are right from my perspective, but from general perspectives, India is not homogeneous.


And race is not a Westen concept any more than biological classification is a western concept.

Race is not a biological classification. Its a social one.

The point once again: Europe has managed to unite into a peaceful economic unit, putting aside their differences. Something India has failed to do with its neighbors.

Your whole argument is based off an unachieveble utopia. Racism/ethnocentrism always exits, and certainly does so in India.
I still believe compared to North America, Asia, Latin America; Europe has the highest living standards, and tries the best to give its immigrants/minorities rights.

Something the Arabs, Chinese, Japanese, Iranians lag behind in.

Anyway, If Europe had less muslims, Jews, like they do in East Asia, it would have been more peaceful.

But the very fact that you say that EU will be much more peaceful if Jews or Muslims were less in number, means there is some form of conflict.

But again we digress. We are talking about whether Europe deserves the peace prize or not. If EU countries bomb middle eastern countries, torture civilians, destroy homes and make people destitute etc etc, then they do not deserve the peace prize JUST BECAUSE their home countries are peaceful. In a developed society like Europe peace is not difficult to achieve. This is not even an achievement. With wealth, social stability and less social inequality comes a much more peaceful society. This isnt rocket science. A Nobel Prize for this? Pffft.
 
.
.
Norway is responsible for the peace prize I think.



First off, the caste system is not based on skin color, unlike concepts of race.

Second, PDF is not representative of South Asia.

Third, Race and IQ posts are purely western phenomenon. People just post links to articles and discuss on it.

Lastly, India is NOT racially homogeneous. BTW I dont believe in concepts of race, AT ALL, so you could say you are right from my perspective, but from general perspectives, India is not homogeneous.




Race is not a biological classification. Its a social one.



But the very fact that you say that EU will be much more peaceful if Jews or Muslims were less in number, means there is some form of conflict.

But again we digress. We are talking about whether Europe deserves the peace prize or not. If EU countries bomb middle eastern countries, torture civilians, destroy homes and make people destitute etc etc, then they do not deserve the peace prize JUST BECAUSE their home countries are peaceful. In a developed society like Europe peace is not difficult to achieve. This is not even an achievement. With wealth, social stability and less social inequality comes a much more peaceful society. This isnt rocket science. A Nobel Prize for this? Pffft.

Again missing the point. Im going to stay on topic.
Do you know how many wars Spain, France, Germany, etc fought with one another? Their conflicts had dominated the globe in earlier times. The fact that they put aside their differences and decided to cooperate is why the prize is being given.

If India, Pakistan did the same, it too would be worthy of a prize, regardless of social ills in the respective nations.
We are talkin governmental level here. Not from a minority POV.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom