What's new

What has America done for Pakistan?

The article says this:

1. Pakistan was born a weak state. Soon after independence, Pakistan’s founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah asked the US, in a letter sent with his emissary, for $2 billion in military and financial aid.

2. From 1954 to 1956, the US gave Pakistan about $1400 million in military aid.

3. During the 1971 war, a carrier task force of America’s Seventh Fleet that included nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Enterprise, several destroyers and nuclear-powered attack submarine Gurnard arrived in the Bay of Bengal in support of Pakistan. But Pakistan Army surrendered a day later.

4. In the 1980s, after Pakistan rejected a $400 million aid package as peanuts, more than $6 billion flew into the country along with weapons.

5. received more than $14 billion in military aid and reimbursements, 17 F-16 aircraft and artillery equipment despite substantial doubts on its commitment to the war on terror.

According to the article, Pakistan has been getting aid and all the help from US from day 1!
And the world's most wanted was found near military acadamy in A'Bad. This is what Pakistan has done for US!
 
.
Let me Put some things in your Mind, So you get understand what is happening here in Pakistan. The Groups that are attacking Pakistan, Were formed after 2005 attack by US on a Seminary Which Killed 80 innocent Teenagers.At that time this group included the run away fighters from Afghanistan, Chechen, Arabs, Foreigners who hired local Tribes who wanted to avenge american attack. Before this incident happened, The fight was only contained in Tribal Areas and was fought with the runaway thousand of militants from afghanistan. But US maniac Drone attack made Militant Group to widen their spectrum of attacks and hiring and and that help them to go out from tribal areas and attack whole NWFP province

Then in 2006, TTP was formed, which consisted of many militant groups came under one umbrella, and these militant groups as usual consisted of local tribesmanm, chechens, uzbeks, arabs.

Then Came the 2007, Red Mosque Siege, Which made these groups attack whole Pakistan

We found So many dreaded terrorists in Pakistan, because when US attacked Afghanistan, Many Militants, and terrorists ran away to Pakistan through one of the most pourus borders of world which even America admits "the border can not be monitored effectively". And these terrorists and militants had lot of American hatred in them. That's when they came to Pak, they start recruiting local Population. and start blowing things Up, Because, In their minds, America made them homeless so they would make every country who is supporting america including america suffer.

So All the Groups and terrorism would not have existed if Americans wouldn't have attacked Afghanistan.

Okay now I understand why this world has terrorist ...coz Americans attacked Afghanistan :taz::cheesy::hitwall:
 
.
In military terms in the WOT:

1. Swat Operation
2. Bajaur Operation
3. South Waziristan Operation
4. Kurram Operation
5. Mohmand Operation

a) Provided supply routes for the US supplies
b) Gave the US the infrastructure to supply these supplies inside Pakistan to Afghanistan through tankers
c) Permitted the drone strikes program
d) Gave information on OBL which the US used to conduct the OBL raid
e) Gave US the co-ordinates of the location of Baitullah Mehsud
f) Captured Mullah Baradar
g) Captured & killed more AQ & Taliban leaders in Pakistan than the US/NATO Forces have in Afghanistan
h) Lost more lives than US & NATO soldiers in Afghanistan
i) Deployed more troops in Pakistan than all the foreign troops combined in Afghanistan
j) Lost more civilian lives than anyone else

There are many more things, but I think you get the picture.
 
. .
can some mod fix the title for god sakes??????????????????????????????and ban this bharati troll
 
.
In military terms in the WOT:

1. Swat Operation
2. Bajaur Operation
3. South Waziristan Operation
4. Kurram Operation
5. Mohmand Operation

a) Provided supply routes for the US supplies
b) Gave the US the infrastructure to supply these supplies inside Pakistan to Afghanistan through tankers
c) Permitted the drone strikes program
d) Gave information on OBL which the US used to conduct the OBL raid
e) Gave US the co-ordinates of the location of Baitullah Mehsud
f) Captured Mullah Baradar
g) Captured & killed more AQ & Taliban leaders in Pakistan than the US/NATO Forces have in Afghanistan
h) Lost more lives than US & NATO soldiers in Afghanistan
i) Deployed more troops in Pakistan than all the foreign troops combined in Afghanistan

There are many more things, but I think you get the picture.

The disease was in your country so someone had to prompt you to clean it up. The US forced you to take some action against the terror infrastructure in your country otherwise the "Jihad"or "1000 Year war" against India would have gone unpunished. You reap the benefits of what you sow. The US only took advantage of a position that you created yourself so you cant blame them or say that we have done them a favor.
 
.
The disease was in your country so someone had to prompt you to clean it up. The US forced you to take some action against the terror infrastructure in your country otherwise the "Jihad"or "1000 Year war" against India would have gone unpunished. You reap the benefits of what you sow. The US only took advantage of a position that you created yourself so you cant blame them or say that we have done them a favor.

As usual The Indian Stance, Which they so dearly like to push around, The Terror Infrastructure was build by the run away Militants from Afghanistan after US Invasion, They Invested heavily in Pakistan in terms of recruiting and creating many Die Hard cadres. But Since you are an Indian, and this thing can't get you through your head even i explained this thing a Page Back, the Groups you are talking about never hit Pakistan, It was the run away foreign and arab militants that start creating problems and recruitment. But Alas, Who am I telling this, A Deaf And Dumb person, who will again Beat his Indian Bush again and again.
 
.
i have bolded important parts. it is very good article

Osama bin Laden has been stolen, Raymond Davis exorcised, and the military’s ego has been hurt once again by men “dressed like characters from Star Wars”. “America is an unreliable ally,” the ISI chief is said to have told the Pakistani parliament in a closed-door briefing.

Pakistan’s ties with terrorists are strategic. Like al Qaeda, Pakistan refers to modern notions of national sovereignty and justice. Like Taliban, Pakistan is concerned less with the enemy and more with spies.

However, our ties with Washington are platonic. If reliability, trust and selflessness are the benchmarks, then the ISI’s evaluation of US foreign policy towards Pakistan is essentially a moral critique.

“What has America done for Pakistan?” parliamentarians asked before calling for a review of ties with the US. Inherent in that question are assumptions that need to be questioned themselves. Why should America do anything for Pakistan?

Pakistan was born a weak state. Soon after independence, Pakistan’s founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah asked the US, in a letter sent with his emissary, for $2 billion in military and financial aid, including $170 million for the army, $75 million for the air force, $60 million for the navy, and $700 million each for industrial and agricultural development. He had made a cultural choice.

Pakistan’s first prime minister Liaquat Ali Khan visited US president Harry Truman in 1950 to sell the country’s “geopolitical importance” to the super power. Pakistan’s decision to seek US help against the perceived Soviet designs to reach the warm waters of the Arabian sea was purely strategic.

What the US did for Pakistan consequently produced the conditions that allowed a state that was not expected to last very long when it came into existence, to develop robust agriculture to feed itself, one of the world’s largest militaries and the ability to produce nuclear energy and weapons.

What has America done for Pakistan’s armed forces?

From 1954 to 1956, the US gave Pakistan about $1400 million in military aid, helping an ill-equipped Pakistan Army develop infrastructure, mobility and firepower, and improve command, control, communication and intelligence capabilities for its newly raised divisions. Also in 1954, Pakistan began to receive more than 100 Sabre F-86F aircraft that made the core of its air force. Armed with Sidewinder missiles, these fighter planes gave the Pakistani air force a decisive edge over the Indian one.

Pakistan had also received several hundred M47 and M48 Patton tanks and artillery equipment that gave it tangible superiority over India. By 1971, Pakistan had lost this edge. During the 1971 war, a carrier task force of America’s Seventh Fleet that included nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Enterprise, several destroyers and nuclear-powered attack submarine Gurnard arrived in the Bay of Bengal in support of Pakistan. But Pakistan Army surrendered a day later.

In the 1980s, after Pakistan rejected a $400 million aid package as peanuts, more than $6 billion flew into the country along with weapons that included about a thousand Stinger missiles, as it fought a perceived Soviet threat in Afghanistan and developed a ‘strategic depth’. Since 9/11 (blamed on the ‘strategic assets’ that Pakistan developed in Afghanistan), we received more than $14 billion in military aid and reimbursements, 17 F-16 aircraft and artillery equipment despite substantial doubts on its commitment to the war on terror. Pakistan Navy received the PNS Alamgir frigate, boats, helicopters and two P-3C Orion surveillance and anti-submarine aircraft (with six in the pipeline) and assigned a key role in the Arabian Sea.

What has America done for Pakistan’s nuclear program?

Pakistan’s civil nuclear quest began with the American Atoms for Peace program. It was offered $350,000 to acquire a nuclear reactor in 1955. In 1965, years after scientists Dr Abdus Salam and Dr Ishrat Hussain Usmani traveled to the US, America gave Pakistan its first nuclear reactor. The reactor at Nilore near Islamabad was built by American nuclear engineer Peter Karter and supplied by contractors American Machine and Foundry.



It was only after Pakistan started to develop nuclear weapons that the US imposed sanctions on the country. American concerns of Pakistan’s role in nuclear proliferation eventually turned out to be true.

What has America done for Pakistan’s economy?

Pakistan’s major existential concern in its early years was that all its rivers came from India, and India could block them to cause famines in Pakistan. After negotiations between India and Pakistan failed, America intervened. With input from US public officials, the World Bank spent six years in talks with India and Pakistan to broker the Indus Water Treaty in 1960. After that, the US and the World Bank were major donors to Pakistan’s irrigation system, that included two large dams (Mangla Dam on Jhelum River and Tarbela Dam on Indus River) that added significantly to Pakistan electricity production, and a number of barrages and headworks (Sidhnai Ravi River, Rasul on Jhelum River, Qadirabad and Marala on Chenab and Chashma on Indus).

In the 1970s, American renaissance man Roger Revelle supervised the Salinity Control and Reclamation Program, American agricultural engineers worked with small-town machine shops in Pakistan to help them develop cheap local land-leveling equipment, and USAID’s agriculture chief Richard Newberg developed a fertiliser production and import policy for Pakistan convincing Washington to supply $100 million worth of fertiliser and invest in the Fauji Fertiliser plant.

American scientist Norman Borlaug, with his new varieties of high-yield seed, oversaw the Green Revolution in Pakistan. He received a Nobel Prize in 1970. By 1977, Pakistan’s production of wheat and other food grains had more than doubled and it became self-sufficient in food production. Decades later, Pakistan’s economy still depends on agriculture.

After the failure of its first five-year plan, Pakistan set up a Planning Commission in 1958. The second five-year plan encouraged private enterprise in areas where profits could be made, and government expenditure in less developed areas. It surpassed its goals and Pakistan became a model of industrial and economic development in what is known as the third world (for example South Korea modeled its capital Seoul after Karachi), mainly due to American input and financial aid.
After 9/11 when Pakistan decided to join the war on terror, the US helped rescheduled loans of more than $12 billion with members of the Paris Club, allowed duty-free import of hundreds of Pakistani products, and gave Pakistan the biggest economic assistance program since the cold war.

The impact of thousands of Pakistani students, researchers and professionals who were sent on scholarships to universities in the US cannot be measured in financial terms.

And in that manner of argument, it might be appropriate in the end to ask a question that has not been asked so far. What has Pakistan done for the US? What has Pakistan done for the US if reliability, trust and selflessness are the benchmarks?
What has America done for Pakistan? | | DAWN.COM
 
.
We done enough

Now we want to sit back and put our feet on table and drink tea

Dobby%2Bon%2Bbed.jpg


Kreature has no master now...... CERATURE will slap anyone telling CREATURE what to do !!! :agree:
A NUCLEAR SLAP

its dobby not creature ;)
 
.
The point should be that in the last 20 years what has america done in the world last 20 years other than kill muslims.
 
.
The point should be that in the last 20 years what has america done in the world last 20 years other than kill muslims.

why u people keep on bringing religion angle in everything ? and tell me how many muslims have killed other people in the world ? why more than 95 % terrorist organistaions are of muslims ?
 
.
The point should be that in the last 20 years what has america done in the world last 20 years other than kill muslims.

and steal oil
and bully
and blackmail
and support zionism
and print dollars
and lie
They used to leaders that were actors like Ronald Reagon coz they were good at pretending and acting the good samaritans. Now they cant be bothered with that either. Apart from that i think they are ok.:azn:
 
.
why u people keep on bringing religion angle in everything ? and tell me how many muslims have killed other people in the world ? why more than 95 % terrorist organistaions are of muslims ?

Retard whats your problem. You rightly got banned as praful
 
.
Retard whats your problem. You rightly got banned as praful

U people keep blaming others for your misfortune, I just showed u the mirror and the perspective of the different side. can't handle the truth ? Don't answer my questions ?? In between your post have been reported for personal attack.
 
.
why u people keep on bringing religion angle in everything ? and tell me how many muslims have killed other people in the world ? why more than 95 % terrorist organistaions are of muslims ?

Inspector Praful, get a grip grow up.
Id call you a monkey but i better not coz you will think im bringing religion into the debate....................
 
.
Back
Top Bottom