Verve
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 11,116
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
What a great definition!
This applies so perfectly to our beloved prophet Muhhammad PBUH and all his early followers at the very beginning of Islam.
Without liberalism, there would be no Islam. Think about that.
What an amazing way to misinterpret 'tolerance and patience' taught by our Prophet (S.A.W) in to liberalism!
I have no issues with anyone living their private lives however they want and I expect the same in return from them. Drinking and whatnot should be done in private and not in the presence of those it offends. People will start taking harsher stances when their faith is disrespected openly, and all people of various faiths and state of minds should avoid such conflicts.
What happened to Taseer was brought on to himself by insulting and openly challenging. His hot headedness costed him his life. Being a seasoned politician, he should have known better. By all means, help the Christian lady as he had the power and influence to do so even from the background but what did he gain by insulting and openly challenging? Too many drinks perhaps and lost self-control - maybe! Same issue with Bhensa group, the urge to insult and attack the faith of majority to gain what exactly - sympathy from West or from the public they've insulted? What these people achieve by such acts is hardening of the stance of the majority, and then these so-called liberal cry murder and abductions when that majority reacts.
I am also utterly against this whole sect business as well. People should keep their sects to themselves. We are polarised enough as it is, there's no need to add to it.
And yes, I have also said in posts before that anyone making false accusations of any kind (inc blasphemy) should be punished harshly. It is not the law, but the proper implementation of the rule of law that's lacking and answer is not to remove the law itself.