If it becomes expensive for the consumer Indian government can always intervene and subsidise Indonesian palm oil if required.
Stop flogging a dead horse
So still Indian consumer losers as they are taxpayers in the end one way or another.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it becomes expensive for the consumer Indian government can always intervene and subsidise Indonesian palm oil if required.
Stop flogging a dead horse
So still Indian consumer losers as they are taxpayers in the end one way or another.
Yes it is slightly expensive at the moment ($10 to a tonne). Indian traders with their vast business dealings should be able to negotiate a better deal.
Irrespective National interest is supreme.
If Pakistanis can eat grass for pride, we can live on sunflower oil surely.Is palm oil oxygen?
If the price does indeed increase, the quantity demanded will just decrease. Basic microeconomics. Plus its not like there are no substitutes to palm oil.
The Islamic front was likely the reason why Turkey and Malaysia took the deliberate step to openly antagonize India on the world stage. Pakistan’s refusal to follow up with solidarity to the alliance would have left Malaysia feel cheated.he has seen the result of siding with pakistan , it was even more adventurous colluding with imran khan in creating a separate islamic front .in both ventures he was left without any gain .
The Islamic front was likely the reason why Turkey and Malaysia took the deliberate step to openly antagonize India on the world stage. Pakistan’s refusal to follow up with solidarity to the alliance would have left Malaysia feel cheated.
I’m not a big fan of Indian retaliation with trade as leverage. Perhaps it would have been wise to use diplomacy to bring the Malaysian government back into neutral zone on Kashmir. Malaysians would have been more receptive to that after Pakistan’s decision to back out of the summit.
BD is irrelevant in this equation. And yes, Muslims are not able to come together. This is apparent by Pakistan’s boycott of the the summit supposedly at the behest of another Muslim country.Malaysia fully understands why Pakistan could not go to the summit.
Stop making it look like the Muslims are not coming together.
BD was the first Muslim country to show solidarity with Malaysia. Goes to show how you have zero leverage with BD - want to start a trade war with BD when you have an over 7 billion US dollar trade surplus with us?
India needs to understand that Malaysia will be backed by many Muslim countries in trade war.
whatever is the case bangladesh will never rally with pakistan against india .Malaysia fully understands why Pakistan could not go to the summit.
Stop making it look like the Muslims are not coming together.
BD was the first Muslim country to show solidarity with Malaysia. Goes to show how you have zero leverage with BD - want to start a trade war with BD when you have an over 7 billion US dollar trade surplus with us?
India needs to understand that Malaysia will be backed by many Muslim countries in trade war.
The Islamic front was likely the reason why Turkey and Malaysia took the deliberate step to openly antagonize India on the world stage. Pakistan’s refusal to follow up with solidarity to the alliance would have left Malaysia feel cheated.
I’m not a big fan of Indian retaliation with trade as leverage. Perhaps it would have been wise to use diplomacy to bring the Malaysian government back into neutral zone on Kashmir. Malaysians would have been more receptive to that after Pakistan’s decision to back out of the summit.
BD is irrelevant in this equation. And yes, Muslims are not able to come together. This is apparent by Pakistan’s boycott of the the summit supposedly at the behest of another Muslim country.
The Islamic front was likely the reason why Turkey and Malaysia took the deliberate step to openly antagonize India on the world stage. Pakistan’s refusal to follow up with solidarity to the alliance would have left Malaysia feel cheated.
I’m not a big fan of Indian retaliation with trade as leverage. Perhaps it would have been wise to use diplomacy to bring the Malaysian government back into neutral zone on Kashmir. Malaysians would have been more receptive to that after Pakistan’s decision to back out of the summit.
whatever is the case bangladesh will never rally with pakistan against india .
BD needs the rest of this decade to build it’s economy military to good level.
BD is a Muslim country and distrusts Hindus India and wants justice for all S Asian Muslims and then Muslims in general.
India exports are falling for last 5 months. Malaysia and turkish consumers need to boycott india too. India has a trade surplus with Turkey. #Boycottindia
lol you keep repeating the same thing again and again , bangladesh has seen the pakistan rule over bangalis so they will always go well along with india .
Kashmir is not about Pakistan but Muslim sovereignty in sub-continent.
It was BD that had the idea of Muslim sovereignty in the first place.
Did you forget how thousands of BD’shis marched in solidarity with Kashmiris last year?
Hasina will not be around at the end of this decade and a new nationalistic leader who better represents the sentiments of average BD’shi Muslim will come to power.
Hasina has a soft spot for India as you helped her family - she is not BD forever dude.