What's new

We’ll no longer let US generosity be taken advantage of’: Haley hails $285mn cut to UN budget

Yes.
And what an open display of blackmail by Trump .. vote against our policy and we'll cut down uno funding... Just think the mindset behind it!!!
Those countries had their right to vote whatever they wanted and they used it.
And its americas right to contribute how much they want.

No point in crying for american money now.

Already China and Japan are contributing to the UN.

They can contribute more with their large economies.

And what makes you think they will not take advantage of the opportunity to fill in the void by USA.
Only a fool wouldn't take that opportunity.

Even Rex Tillerson said China and Russia would fill in the void left by USA.

Lets talk about japan, its almost a world power, contributing already significantly. But still it does not have UNSC seat. So why should japan contribute more, without any benefit of a permanant member ?
Same is the case for germany.

Even india can contribute more for that matter. All these coutnries can contribute more to fill in american void but not without reforming UNSC and accomodating new members.
 
.
And its americas right to contribute how much they want.
Absolutely it has the right to do that no one is arguing on that but it should keep in mind the consequences of it :angel:
 
.
Absolutely it has the right to do that no one is arguing on that but it should keep in mind the consequences of it :angel:
If every tom dick and harry on the internet have calculated and predicted the consequences, you think the lone super power and its administration have not calculated it ? Chill bro, dont take much pressure.
 
.
Who benefits from the UN, let me think, maybe that country that was openly threatening the rest of the world (including their own allies) a few days ago at the UN?

Pulling out of UNESCO, doing everything they can to cut down the UN budget, etc.?

Trump should just live up to his promise and pull the USA out of the UN, you won't see many tears being shed over that, except maybe Micronesia and Palau (and that too only as long as the money keeps flowing).

Don't you think China benefits from the current set-up with its permanent veto? And if so concerned about funding of UN and its organization, other nations should step-up. China can afford to double its contribution. In fact, the funding should be more democratic anyway.

As for UN not missing US if it leaves is just laughable. Like I said a UN without US is a toothless organization.

UN without US will harm US interests more than UN

I wholeheartedly agree.
 
. . .
If every tom dick and harry on the internet have calculated and predicted the consequences, you think the lone super power and its administration have not calculated it ? Chill bro, dont take much pressure.
Naturally other great powers will fill in the void, when USA withdraws.
 
.
UNO and brics are not some parellels.
If at all it has to be UNO abolished completely and new body formed, with consultation to the new world order.
But BRICS can become that body for other countries in Africa, Asia and south America, Europe and north America can have another body...
 
.
If every tom dick and harry on the internet have calculated and predicted the consequences, you think the lone super power and its administration have not calculated it ?
Well with them mimicking behaviour of DPRK i highly doubt it :angel:
I wholeheartedly agree.
Their 50,s Americano number uno mindset has clouded their judgement its not the post world war World anymore
And i cant stop laughing at the sheer hypocrisy of America on globalism i mean it was good till developing countries were at the receiving end now that they learned how to work it in their favor its the worse thing since canned burgers :lol:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/25/world/americas/trump-united-nations-budget.html
 
.
Most of money goes back in form employes...if they cut too much than un head quarters might be moved
 
.
As for UN not missing US if it leaves is just laughable. Like I said a UN without US is a toothless organization.

The United Nations WITH the USA is a toothless organisation, the United Nations WITHOUT the USA is a toothless organisation, so there is no difference. :lol:

But maybe after the USA leaves then the remaining members of the UN (basically the whole world) will try to make it a more useful and powerful organisation. Countries like China and Russia, and those in Europe for example, would see it as a big opportunity.
 
.
Yes. You paid off the mortgage(which is a debt). In addition to the interest.
Do you understand what "paid off" actually means? :D



Please try explaining that to your good friend @Iqbal Ali who thinks those other countries will pay up just like that. :D



Not my problem. Some here think Russia and China will step up like magic. Not me, of course.
 
.
Please try explaining that to your good friend @Iqbal Ali who thinks those other countries will pay up just like that. :D

If it is in their national interest they will definitely pay.:D Iqbal thinks it is in their National interest :Dand you have your doubts and think no one /group can replace your USA.:D
 
. .
The biggest handicap and what makes the UN mostly ineffectiv is the veto right of 5 nations in the UNSC... after ww2 this 5 nations are the biggest warmongers on earth and with their veto right they could stop UN everytime to get into action against them.... as long as the rest of the world accept this the UN is ineffectiv... the rest of the world should stand up and say ...no longer... we dont accept your veto anymore... if they dont like what the majority of the world population wants they show their true dictatorship
 
.
Back
Top Bottom