Yaar please spare us the good words from the book of "democracy". As if anything other than democracy is a sin.
Your whole post is an effort to vilify Musharraf on the basis of his take over. Well for Pakistanis, at that time democracy meant nothing. He came, did whatever he could, failed at some, succeeded at others.
It matters very little in the world of politics as to the means that were used to get to ones goals. Your uber-democrat, Indra Gandhi imposed the most undemocratic of all things over India by imposing emergency rule. So this issue is not as black and white as you are trying to depict it.
Musharraf had guts, he managed his relations externally better than internally. His offers to India post Kargil were legitimate. What he did in Kargil had certain reasons which have been discussed in the Kargil threads many times over. At least I do not blame him for the reasons, but I have certain issued with the way it was conducted. In any case that is in the past and post Kargil, Musharraf definitely did a lot of straight talking with India. He was one person who knew a lot about the problem owing to his background. You will not find a person more knowledgeable about the Kashmir issue than the DGMO of the Pakistani and the Indian Armies. He offered his insights and experience and it was not taken up.
The rest is as it was before. I am sure it makes sense to vilify Musharraf in India by not only putting the Kargil issue on him, but also labeling him the anti-democrat because it resonates well with the public in India. To me the one quality of Musharraf, that stands out more than anything else, is his love for Pakistan. He goes to bat for Pakistan no matter where he is. He can easily relax in retirement and not bother with this stuff, but makes an effort to take on the negative perceptions about Pakistan and does his level best (which is much much better than what any recent government in Pakistan has been able to do).
He is not busy politicking inside of Pakistan to secure something for himself, rather he is out talking it out with the Pakistan bashers (by this I do not mean Indians, rather the ant-Pakistan lobby in general). That is more than what any other former leader of Pakistan has done.
Your whole post is an effort to vilify Musharraf on the basis of his take over. Well for Pakistanis, at that time democracy meant nothing. He came, did whatever he could, failed at some, succeeded at others.
It matters very little in the world of politics as to the means that were used to get to ones goals. Your uber-democrat, Indra Gandhi imposed the most undemocratic of all things over India by imposing emergency rule. So this issue is not as black and white as you are trying to depict it.
Musharraf had guts, he managed his relations externally better than internally. His offers to India post Kargil were legitimate. What he did in Kargil had certain reasons which have been discussed in the Kargil threads many times over. At least I do not blame him for the reasons, but I have certain issued with the way it was conducted. In any case that is in the past and post Kargil, Musharraf definitely did a lot of straight talking with India. He was one person who knew a lot about the problem owing to his background. You will not find a person more knowledgeable about the Kashmir issue than the DGMO of the Pakistani and the Indian Armies. He offered his insights and experience and it was not taken up.
The rest is as it was before. I am sure it makes sense to vilify Musharraf in India by not only putting the Kargil issue on him, but also labeling him the anti-democrat because it resonates well with the public in India. To me the one quality of Musharraf, that stands out more than anything else, is his love for Pakistan. He goes to bat for Pakistan no matter where he is. He can easily relax in retirement and not bother with this stuff, but makes an effort to take on the negative perceptions about Pakistan and does his level best (which is much much better than what any recent government in Pakistan has been able to do).
He is not busy politicking inside of Pakistan to secure something for himself, rather he is out talking it out with the Pakistan bashers (by this I do not mean Indians, rather the ant-Pakistan lobby in general). That is more than what any other former leader of Pakistan has done.
Last edited: