Read the article you posted, and the section what this dunce author calls "Straight out of Nazi playbook"- and notice how she doesn't point to any similarities- instead writes in tangents. She describes the Nazi eugenics and continues her rant.
Not trying to come off as a troll- but am genuinely interested in what similarities there might be besides of course both being eugenics.
You're not even trying.
Dietrich Eckart, who developed the ideology of a "genius superman", based on writings by Lanz von Liebenfels, was a member of the Nazi party and one of its ideologues. These ideas also took root in the Soviet Union in the form of "New Soviet Man". Ergo, "Straight out of the Nazi playbook".
Also as pointed out by the writer,
Although the RSS had next to nothing participation in the Indian freedom struggle, and even though it had decided to support the British and pick Muslims, Christians and the seculars as the true enemy of India, the sting of being a “weak Hindu”, a physically inferior collection of people has never stopped hurting the Sangh.
Inspired by Swami Vivekananda’s calls for martial glory to be found in a recreated industrial Hinduism, the original RSS stalwarts found a political validity in racial resurrection championed by Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich.
And even now, a racially pure search for homeland or creation of one along racially/communally pure lines appeals to the RSS and is at the heart of its ideology, and that is what explains the political admiration that many in the Sangh have for Zionist Israel, even though Jews were the main targets of the Nazi regime.
Read: Dietrich Eckart, New Soviet man
@Khanate Also trying to write off the "fair/white/pale skinned" obsession as solely an Indian problem is false too. You'll see this same inferiority complex spanning all of Asia-from the Middle East to China. Indians are of course riddled by it, albeit to an unhealthy extent.
Read my earlier post,
Again, this is the statement of Dr Hitesh Jani, national convener of Arogya Bharati:
The parents may have lower IQ, with a poor educational background, but their baby can be extremely bright. If the proper procedure is followed, babies of dark-skinned parents with lesser height can have fair complexion and grow taller.
Explain how is this not
discrimination? Why does a dark-skinned child needs to be fair? or tall? What part of Indic science promotes this view?
By defending what is clearly wrong, you are demeaning million of people on this planet. Don't defend these positions. Please. There is no religious subtext here, no India vs Pakistan. There are dark-skinned people in Pakistan. This is a question of basic humanity. (
Source)
I pleaded with
@Samudra Manthan so we wouldn't have to hash out these ugly arguments. I didn't want this debate to be about religion, country or a match of egos since dark-skinned people live across South Asia so you're not doing me, a Pakistani, any favours by rejecting these ideologies. Sadly, people will argue in favour of something that is clearly wrong simply out of tribal instincts or whatever other rationale they may give themselves.