Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Currently, Iraq is in civil war. At least during Saddam's time, there was a sense of calm and peace.
Had Saddam been still alive, this so called ISIS would have been dealt with quickly.
That's the nature of humans, when they are not satisfied with something, they tend to stick to the past, even if it wasn't any better. Saddam is the sole reason that Iraq was attacked, came to verge of financial collapse and a human crisis and finally was invaded and overthrown. He killed tens of thousands of Kurds and Shiites, executed every single opponent, started 2 unnecessary wars that broke the country and now we are where we are.
it's like saying North Korea is better off now because it has no terrorist attacks. Groups like ISIS will not tolerate any Shia even breathing, let alone ruling a country. So, na matter how much mistakes Maliki has, it still doesn't matter because these scums want to eradicate every single Shia and 'infidels' from the globe. If it wasn't for Saddam's stupid policies, Iraq would be a major economic powerhouse in ME, even far better than countries like UAE or Qatar, because they didn't even exist when Iraq was a prosperous country in late 60s and 70s.
PS: I also forgot to say that many Sunnis were slaughtered because of his wars.
depends on who you are asking.
It has never been better for kurds, they almost got a kurdistan.They got the best deal.
Shias finally rule their own people too, they were being ruled by a sunni establishment earlier.
However its certainly is quite worse for sunnis, and hopefully the current conflict will make sure they get the fair share in iraq.
@Nihonjin1051
this thread has the potential to bring out lot of angry iranis, and khomenei-loving shia from iraq how can they speak well of the enemy of mullah khomenei and the supporter of mujahideen-e-khalq??
but yes, president saddam hussain was a great leader, much loved outside iraq, and iraq was better off with saddam and the baath movement. but why worry?? his trusted comrade, izzat ibrahim al douri, wanted by the usa military for 10 years, is leading his heroic baath fighters into sure victory soon. these fighters seem also to have fought the nato invasion of libya, in 2012. my salute to saddam and his heroes.
So much false info not even worthy to respond to.
You do know why he invaded Kuwait?
Because he owed them a ton of cash from the Iran war and didn't want to pay them back. It's an old Mafia trick. Borrow a lot of money from a loan shark and then kill him. Debt erased.
here comes the white house propaganda service. next he will say, "oh, but evil saddam's evil solldiers pulled out innocent kuwaiti infants from hospital incubators and stood there watching them the little babies die...".
In my opinion, Saddam should not have invaded Kuwait , and should have merely consolidated its power and rebuilt itself after the Iraq-Irani War. The loss of Iraq's military power, led to such power vacuum that has allowed many organization(s) to capitalize on.
Yeah !!! 'Innocent kuwaiti infants' !!!! So genius, why DID Sadaam invade Kuwait ? Diagonal oil drilling ? I was against the 2nd Iraq war, but the 1st one, man that was fun !!! We fucked some shit up, BIG TIME !! YEEEEE HAAAAAA !!!!!! Who can forget this golden oldie ? The old 'Road of Death'