What's new

Viewpoint: Britain must pay reparations to India

. . .
Hmm, and then the Indian members claim that my city (Hong Kong) is only a first-world city because of the British colonialism.

Indians should know better than anyone else, that the British colonialists only took, they never gave.

And it also doesn't explain why Shanghai (despite not being a colony) is now arguably more advanced than even Hong Kong.
Not only Shanghai, but Beijing is there too. Within five to ten years, Shenzhen will be more advance than HK. IT took the Brit 150 years to modernize HK at the time when they had absolute power. China took 20 years for Shanghai. Shenzhen was a village in 1988.
 
. . .
That does not matter... its a ceremonial thing. The legislative power lies with the parliament.... which is elected by the people, right?
Britain still sing praise of the monarchy which looted India but yeah like you said it does not matter.
 
.
Well Bengal Famine is the big famine but there was widespread famine all over south asia cuz of the Brits.

Kohinoor was taken from Lahore so it should be returned to Lahore :).
Kohinoor found in Guntur district, Andhra...:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl: identification crisis...
 
.
CKsoXaXUsAAWSXp.jpg
 
.
In Australia they would hunt indigenous tribes, kill the men and then hang their severed heads around the widowed women like a necklace.
 
.
In Australia they would hunt indigenous tribes, kill the men and then hang their severed heads around the widowed women like a necklace.

Back then they didn't even consider non-whites to be humans.

The Native Americans for example were considered to be "inhuman savages", the European colonists used to hunt them down, and cut off their scalp to make tobacco pouches. Just like they would for an animal.

In Hong Kong, my history teacher (he was British himself) said that in the past, when a British person ran over a HK Chinese local with a car, it would be a good idea to reverse back over him and finish the job. Because if you killed him you only had to pay for his funeral, but if he was left alive they would have to pay much more for his medical bills.

That's how they saw non-whites back then. Hell, back then they didn't even care much for other whites (Germans/Russians/Polish), so it's hardly surprising that they didn't consider non-whites like Native Americans as humans in the first place.
 
.
What he said was true and based on facts. I am not sure if anyone would disagree with that.
However, no one ever asks the question, that how come the natives always fell so easily in front of the colonialists (and by their way of doing things, Capitalists of the new Industrial Revolution?)

Don't blame others for your own follies. Don't blame others for being able to point and shoot you at their will.

Hi,

Better and more advanced weaponery---cannons firing grape shot rather than single ball---better trained soldiers----switching from cavalry to infantry----more disciplined soldiers----forming multiple rows-----one row shooting after another---and the previous row loading---.

Plus battle hardened troops coming from the end of the 100 years war in Europe and then all the promise of loot and plunder of India----.

It is the same way---as Mahmud Ghaznavi was hungry for wealth----so were the colonists----.
 
. .
Which India? It was all Bangladesh, India, Pakistan when British were ruling this part of the region. They have done some good things as well like abolishing caste system, gave you a proper legal system, competent army, introduced concept of civil services and proper legal systems as well as concept of democracy and good railways system and civil engineering work and brought education reforms. Even your fav sport cricket was introduced by British

Britain were also invaded by Romans/viking so they should also demand compensation from them :D
 
.
A company is not a democratic state which represents all its citizens who can participate in its political actions.
Oh, but a company authorized by you makes YOU responsible.

It does not take much to accept that you are at fault here. There is no way you can justify or condone British colonial rule and the lack of justice in that regard.

Which India? It was all Bangladesh, India, Pakistan when British were ruling this part of the region. They have done some good things as well like abolishing caste system, gave you a proper legal system, competent army, introduced concept of civil services and proper legal systems as well as concept of democracy and good railways system and civil engineering work and brought education reforms. Even your fav sport cricket was introduced by British

Britain were also invaded by Romans/viking so they should also demand compensation from them :D
Sher Shah Suri was a better adminstrator in the medieval India. We follow a mix of Ashoka's ideology and Akbar's admin setup as inspiration in today's India. Only the nomenclature is English. That is also only because it is a neutral language that is understood all over the country (especially with the growing literacy/education).
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom