What's new

Vietnam Deploys Submarines to Scare Off China in South China Sea

Actually it is a good thing. I am surprised that those subs haven't already been deployed. The interaction between those subs and Chinese warships would be an enhanced training exercise, after, of course, Chinese warships have been trained with their own Kilos.

:-)

video-dac-biet-ve-suc-manh-hai-quan-viet-nam-vinhhangvien.vn_.jpg
Nice boat. :) Where is the stern?
 
. .
End of the day: Cooler heads prevail--


Vietnamese NA, China’s NPC sign cooperation agreement
Chairman of Vietnam’s National Assembly Nguyen Sinh Hung and Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of China (NPC) Zhang Dejiang signed a cooperation agreement between the two countries’ legislatures after their talks in Beijing on December 24.

20151225094147-vn-china.jpg


NA Chairman Nguyen Sinh Hung (L) and Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of China Zhang Dejiang signed a cooperation agreement between the two countries’ legislatures.





Enough of these unproductive war-war threads. Its all sound and fury representing nothing. We all know that in the end of the day trade is what matters.
I notice an inflation of articles from foreign press talking about war between the two countries. in VN, people rather discuss if the many cranes pose a danger to the public than the chinese with their games in the SC sea.

cau1_zing.JPG


Cancau7_zing.JPG


Cancau8_zing.jpg


Cancau9_zing.JPG



Cancau10_zing.JPG



Cancau11_zing.JPG



Cancau3_zing.JPG
 
.
You tried to invade when the Vietnam army was busy trying to stop your sponsored genocide in Cambodia with the Khmer Rouge.

They still beat you back and kicked you out. Today the 'Jungle' is still theirs.
Then how do you explained the Spratly island south Johnson reef war in 1988? I can bet your history is selective or you lack of knowledge to comment on this thread. :enjoy:

But they prefer not to buy cheap reverse engineered cloned equipment! :azn:

P.S. Seriously, are you a sales representative for the Chinese defence industry? Your post seems to say so! :lol:
If the VPN is really serious deter against the Chinese. They shall not buy a similar kilo636 that PLAN owned 12 of them. We know every secret of those sub. So what's new? :lol:

While VPN knows nothing of Song, Yuan and our Type093 SSN. It will be a slaughtered if war started.
 
. .
I notice an inflation of articles from foreign press talking about war between the two countries. in VN, people rather discuss if the many cranes pose a danger to the public than the chinese with their games in the SC sea.

cau1_zing.JPG


Cancau7_zing.JPG


Cancau8_zing.jpg


Cancau9_zing.JPG



Cancau10_zing.JPG



Cancau11_zing.JPG



Cancau3_zing.JPG
Maybe true until the Vietnam government stirs up the emotion of common folks.
 
. . . . . .
I see. It is a corvette. The original picture makes it look small. I thought it was a missile boat. Thanks :)
we classify such vessel as frigate. these smaller vessels are corvettes.

1_mith.bmp


8_kvro.bmp


10_gwpv.bmp



5_syzx.bmp
 
.
we classify such vessel as frigate. these smaller vessels are corvettes.

1_mith.bmp



10_gwpv.bmp



5_syzx.bmp
I know. China does the same. In the English world, we may just follow the convention of English speaking folks.
 
.
I know. China does the same. In the English world, we may just follow the convention of English speaking folks.
well, do you know the difference between a frigate and a destroyer as per definition?

no, it is not the tonnage of the ship. a 5,000 tons vessel can be a destroyer if the vessel can conduct independent sea battles without support of other vessels. that is it that counts. so if you pack all necessary weapons on the ship: anti sub, anti air threat, anti ship, etc..., all radar sensors, all stuffs including helicopter, like a destroyer, then you have a destroyer.
 
.
well, do you know the difference between a frigate and a destroyer as per definition?

no, it is not the tonnage of the ship. a 5,000 tons vessel can be a destroyer if the vessel can conduct independent sea battles without support of other vessels. that is it that counts. so if you pack all necessary weapons on the ship: anti sub, anti air threat, anti ship, etc..., all radar sensors, all stuffs including helicopter, like a destroyer, then you have a destroyer.
It is all about convention. A modern destroyer packs more punch than a WWII cruiser. Japan even calls her LHD a destroyer. Chinese call their corvette "light frigate". Since I am an English speaking world, I just use whatever terms they use. :)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom