AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Useless thread for a meager amount ...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not the reason it's a good decision. The reason why it's a good decision is that the money supplied gives a not-very-democratic government less ability to spend money without the consent of its citizenry.
I really don't see why, at this stage, the U.S. government shouldn't start closing all the money taps. Let Pakistan's government collect taxes from its citizens or panhandle elsewhere.
we fought your war and defeated the soviet union for you in the 70's and look at how you have treated us in return. giving india civil nuclear deals in the 90's, now selling them arms.What should be "the most important" for you and Pakistan, is to not always find others to support you better than the previous party, but to grow your country, avoid damaging the political stability, so you don't ever have to need American or Chinese $$. But just watching your country and its politics and military affairs, it seems as if you guys don't want stability and will continue to damage your country, scare investors off, etc. I have never seen so much divide that has damaged a country to this degree and still no one has learned from the past mistakes, sadly!
That's fine, lots of anti Pak lobbies are active. But, Pentagon has final say in all matters.WASHINGTON: The Pentagon will not make military reimbursements to Pakistan for fiscal year 2016 after US defense secretary Jim Mattis told Congressthat Islamabad had not taken sufficient action against the Haqqani network, a US official said on Friday.
"The funds could not be released to the Government of Pakistan at this time because the secretary could not certify that Pakistan has taken sufficient action against the Haqqani Network per the requirement in the FY 2016 National Defense Authorization Act," Adam Stump, a Pentagon spokesman, said.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...mbursements-pentagon/articleshow/59701785.cms
Zabardast. Thank you uncle sam, we don't really give a damn. Blessing in disguise
If we build a road in Afghanistan with our money then that means we own their country? Ch..ya indian.
we fought your war and defeated the soviet union for you in the 70's and look at how you have treated us in return. giving india civil nuclear deals in the 90's, now selling them arms.
And please look at the USA systematic racial problems then comment on anything pakistan does
SO no DO MORE.WASHINGTON: The Pentagon will not make military reimbursements to Pakistan for fiscal year 2016 after US defense secretary Jim Mattis told Congressthat Islamabad had not taken sufficient action against the Haqqani network, a US official said on Friday.
"The funds could not be released to the Government of Pakistan at this time because the secretary could not certify that Pakistan has taken sufficient action against the Haqqani Network per the requirement in the FY 2016 National Defense Authorization Act," Adam Stump, a Pentagon spokesman, said.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...mbursements-pentagon/articleshow/59701785.cms
source?You built the road with their aid money and support.