What's new

US told Pakistan to get out of areas occupied during Kargil war: Former Pak envoy to US

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really? The question of expanding the theatre of war did not arise as Pakistani troops had no other alternative but to withdraw due to a number of reasons as brought out by Gen Kayani himself, ex Pak 10 Corps Commander.

He categorically mentioned two important points:

1. India artillery barrages were so heavy, it resulted in unacceptable casualties to the Pakistan Army.
2. Nawaz Sharif rushed to the US to stop the Indian onslaught as in his own words, "Yeh Pakistan fauj ka izzat ka sawal thha"! In other words, the casualties were mounting and they desperately needed 'safe passage' and a halt to the murderous Indian artillery barrages so they could withdraw without further casualties.

In addition, after the main logistics base at Muntho Dhalo was destroyed by IAF Mirage aircraft, the supply chain that included water, ammo, spares, food etc completely broke down. With no supplies, Pak troops even resorted to eating snow to quench their thirst! Eating raw rice is hardly an option as there was no k-oil for cooking!

And friend Mush famously says in his book, "had Nawaz Sharif not run to the US to stop the war, Pakistan would have captured Siachen"!!!! Really? :woot: With no ammo, no rations, no nothing? Mush was probably Superman! :P

Full of bs .. Like a chest thumping jingoistic 16 year old high on nonsense ...
 
He dismissed the notion that the theatre of war would have expanded had Pakistan not withdrawn.
Indian Navy was already preparing for a complete blockade of Karachi.That would have starved the Pakistanis of oil among many other things.But the fiasco came to an end before that.
 
Indian Navy was already preparing for a complete blockade of Karachi.That would have starved the Pakistanis of oil among many other things.But the fiasco came to an end before that.
-
yes ,, reports were full army deployed in west coast from east..
 
Its true Because of nawaz cowardness,we retreated back otherwise the capability to recapture kargil and other part of ladadkh existed with pak
Ofcourse, why not there is always some excuse...Let me know when your words are supported by ground reality, until then... shu...
 
What is new in this? We all know this already.

It was Sharif the idiot who forced PA to withdraw after he receive some $$ from US.

As we say that militarily Pakistan had won but diplomatically lost.

BTW those areas were not occupied but liberated by Pakistan.


Same asshole who was shitting bricks in 98 and was ready to take Dollars from USA in exchange for no nuclear tests.. He was briefed and I know someone who received him at kargil for the briefing .. Or maybe he is too dumb to understand what was being briefed about ???

And no wonder this son of a bitch will never make a committee to investigate 99.. Cos he knows he will get screwed.
 
Same asshole who was shitting bricks in 98 and was ready to take Dollars from USA in exchange for no nuclear tests.. He was briefed and I know someone who received him at kargil for the briefing .. Or maybe he is too dumb to understand what was being briefed about ???

And no wonder this son of a bitch will never make a committee to investigate 99.. Cos he knows he will get screwed.
--
instead of problem can you give solution
its easy to blame others than to act ..
what you had if u been PM that ttime
 
Why are people still stuck in Kargil era? Maybe that is why our country isnt advancing...people keep wasting money of coffee meetings about something that is done and cant be worked on no more...

study of history is important ....because many times history repeats itself .

Just because it's unpleasant we should not shun history ...

however it's different thing to live in past altogether ...
 
Musharraf himself sent Nawaz Sharif to Washington after the fall of Tololing Peak to plead Clinton to mediate for a ceasfire and the save the face of Pakistan.
 
study of history is important ....because many times history repeats itself .

Just because it's unpleasant we should not shun history ...

however it's different thing to live in past altogether ...
Study is fine...but meeting upon meetings, discussions upon discussions ...both sides are still holding their part! So what did we learn? Nothing! Rather both sides are miserably living it...

I spoke for my end that I dont think it is necessary to discuss something that has been discussed forever and yielded nothing ...its better to move on...

I am yet to see an Indian say that!
 
I spoke for my end that I dont think it is necessary to discuss something that has been discussed forever and yielded nothing ...its better to move on...

I am yet to see an Indian say that!

No..we r just asking you to move on..it's past.:enjoy:...now work on our common interest.

Do I get a present? :-)
 
Its true Because of nawaz cowardness,we retreated back otherwise the capability to recapture kargil and other part of ladadkh existed with pak

Entire pakistan must be thankful to nawaz... Otherwise it would have been a new chapter of embarrassment to pakistan, more then 1971 episode....FYI....But this time we were not interested for surrender of pakistani force...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom