gambit
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 28,569
- Reaction score
- 148
- Country
- Location
I do not make fun of people's language skill. You have no need to even consider that from me.im sorry but i didnt get it exactly.(my english is not good).
it could have Emergency landing in tabas.and underside of uav took damages.that was not unusual.also you can see more damages in its left wings.
Anyway...Speed has an important role in any aviation mishap, namely, the higher the speed, the worse conditions of the crash. These drones are not designed to be high speed, in fact, your car on the freeway has the same take-off speed as these drone do. They are designed to exploit aerodynamic forces in as many attitudes as possible. For this design, which is 'all-wing', the only way we can have a head-on collision with the Earth is if there are so much damages that the wing could not exploit any aerodynamic forces at all.
Given what we have seen so far of the Iranian presentation, we can see that the entire topside of this wing quite undamaged. Whatever dents and dings we see, they are not enough to disrupt airflow to cause an out of control condition. For that level of damages, we would be looking at traces of fire from a missile. We do not see such traces. So if Iran did managed to 'hijack' the authority and control of the drone and landed it quite gently, even if on hard ground, show US the underside. If Iran concede that Iran had nothing to do with the crash, then what I have speculated so far about the drone is correct -- malfunction -- and that the drone became autonomous and landed itself, gently or not. Still, show US the underside. Nothing to lose.