What's new

US Politics

Dominion Voting System’s 1.6 billion defamation case has exposed Fox News despicable propaganda. How damn Fox News misled millions of their viewers into believing Trump’s BIG LIE.


5589c7fc7b8e8ae8199ca72f62f6661c6bac0d6a27b64e87f1395060163e736b_1.jpg


The 10 biggest revelations from Dominion’s explosive Fox News legal filing


Analysis by Oliver Darcy, CNN
Tue February 28, 2023

New York CNN —

Fox News continues to be exposed for the dishonest organization that it is — this time, with the help of its billionaire owner.

A Monday filing in Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion lawsuit against the right-wing talk channel offered additional revelations — including the fact that Fox Corporation chair Rupert Murdoch admitted in a deposition that some of his top hosts were pushing election lies to his audience.

Murdoch rejected that Fox News, as an entity, endorsed former President Donald Trump’s election lies. But Murdoch conceded that Sean Hannity, Jeanine Pirro, Maria Bartiromo, and former host Lou Dobbs promoted falsehoods about the 2020 presidential contest being stolen.

“Yes. They endorsed,” Murdoch said, according to the filing, when asked about the hosts’ promotion of false claims about the election.

“I would have liked us to be stronger in denouncing it, in hindsight,” the media mogul added at another point in the deposition.

That’s just one of the several revelations included in Monday’s filing. Here are some additional highlights:


► In the wake of the election, Murdoch wrote in an email to the New York Post’s Col Allan, describing election lies that Trump was pushing as “bulls**t and damaging.”


► Murdoch said it was “wrong” for Tucker Carlson to host conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell after the election. When asked why he continued to allow the MyPillow CEO to continue appearing on Fox News, Murdoch signaled it was a business decision. “It is not red or blue, it is green,” he said. That’s a shocking admission from Murdoch about what actually guides coverage at Fox News.


► Behind the scenes, Paul Ryan repeatedly warned the Murdochs to stop allowing the spread of election lies. The former House speaker said that Fox News should “move on from Donald Trump” and “stop spouting election lies.” Ryan told the Murdochs that many of those who thought the election had been stolen did so “because they got a diet of information telling them the election was stolen from what they believe were credible sources.” He was not wrong.

► Murdoch responded to one email from Ryan by telling him that Sean Hannity had “been privately disgusted by Trump for weeks, but was scared to lose viewers.” In other words, Hannity, who always claims to say the same things on camera as when he’s off camera, was not being up front with his loyal audience for fear they’d rebel against him.


► Murdoch gave Jared Kushner “confidential information” about then-candidate Joe Biden’s ads “along with debate strategy” in 2020, the filing said, offering Trump’s son-in-law “a preview of Biden’s ads before they were public.” At most news organizations, this type of action would result in an investigation and disciplinary measures.

► Murdoch asked Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott to have Hannity say “something supportive” about Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham ahead of the 2020 election. Murdoch explained, “We cannot lose the Senate if at all possible.” In other words, Murdoch was directing the head of his talk network to help the GOP. Again, this type of directive from an executive would be a major scandal at an actual news network.


► When Shepard Smith attacked the “Trump administration’s ‘lies’” on air, Rupert emailed Scott and Fox News president Jay Wallace calling it “Over the top!” and telling them, “Need to chat to him.” In another instance, Lachlan Murdoch told Scott that then-correspondent Leland Vittert was “smug and obnoxious” when reporting from a Nov. 14 pro-Trump rally. Murdoch said the tone should be a “celebration of the president.”


► Despite Fox accurately calling the race in Arizona for Biden, Murdoch suggested firing Bill Sammon, then the head of the network’s Washington bureau. “Maybe best to let Bill go right away,” which would “be a big message with Trump people” the filing said. Sammon was later “told the inevitable” that day on Nov. 20, 2020.


► Murdoch said he “suggested or urged” the firing of host Lou Dobbs because he “was an extremist,” but allowed him to continue hosting a program at the network until after the election. Dominion argues that’s because Dobbs was popular with Trump and his supporters and the network was fending off viewer defections to Newsmax.


In totality, the documents continue to underscore that at its core, Fox News is not a news network. News networks work hard to deliver the truth to their viewers. These documents reveal that Fox News executives and hosts knew the truth and yet they peddled election lies to the audience. And when the handful of hosts and correspondents who have integrity at the channel tried to be honest with viewers, the highest levels of Fox News worked against them.


The documents lay bare that the channel’s business model is not based on informing its audience, but rather on feeding them content — even dangerous conspiracy theories — that keeps viewers happy and watching.

In response, Fox News said in a statement that Dominion’s lawsuit “has always been more about what will generate headlines than what can withstand legal and factual scrutiny.” The network added, “Their summary judgment motion took an extreme, unsupported view of defamation law that would prevent journalists from basic reporting and their efforts to publicly smear Fox for covering and commenting on allegations by a sitting President of the United States should be recognized for what it is: a blatant violation of the First Amendment.”


Top legal experts CNN has spoken with disagree with Fox News’ assessment of Dominion’s legal filings. But even if Dominion does not prevail in court, it has left a permanent stain on the channel and revealed its true motives.
 
. .

Michelle Obama opens up about her ‘uncontrollable sobbing’ on day of Trump’s inauguration​



 
Last edited:
.

Michelle Obama opens up about her ‘uncontrollable sobbing’ on day of Trump’s inauguration​

May be people like Obama , but one of the worst president ...
 
.
May be people like Obama , but one of the worst president ...
Obama was a Just the face of diversity to keep the show going and public engaged. Behind the scenes Deep State placed Biden as VP who was running the show for the deep state.
 
.
Jake Tapper fact-checks Fox News narrative on Jan. 6 attack

Michelle Obama opens up about her ‘uncontrollable sobbing’ on day of Trump’s inauguration​



Okay, I could not figure it out, was there some kind of message there? :-)

Obama was a Just the face of diversity to keep the show going and public engaged. Behind the scenes Deep State placed Biden as VP who was running the show for the deep state.
https://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Boo...isputes-the-notion-of-a-deep-state-conspiracy

In Deep’ disputes the notion of a ‘deep state’ conspiracy

New Yorker writer David Rohde traces the rise of distrust in government agencies, along with the expansion of presidential powers, over 40 years.
 
Last edited:
.

Your questions about the Trump indictment, answered

How strong is the case? Can Trump continue campaigning? And when will he be brought to trial?
By JOSH GERSTEIN and KYLE CHENEY
03/30/2023

The unprecedented indictment of former President Donald Trump plunges the legal system into murky waters.

The Manhattan grand jury’s decision to charge Trump for his alleged involvement in a hush money scheme raises a bevy of questions about the soundness of the case, the logistics involved in forcing a former president into criminal court and the ramifications for other ongoing state and federal investigations of Trump.

Here’s POLITICO’s look at some of the key questions posed by the indictment.


What is Trump accused of?

While the precise charges are secret for now, prosecutors have concluded they can prove a criminal case against Trump because of the apparent subterfuge surrounding a $130,000 payment to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels to keep her from publicizing her claim about a sexual encounter with Trump. Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen funded that payment through a home equity line of credit.
Trump insisted in April 2018 he did not know about the hush money, but Cohen provided Congress a series of check images, signed by Trump, reflecting payments to Cohen that he said were reimbursements for the money he laid out, including at least two that came while Trump was in the White House. Cohen said that Trump and his company concealed the purpose of the payments by falsely labeling them as legal expenses.

Under New York law, disguising such payments in corporate records is a crime, but typically only a misdemeanor. It becomes a felony if the false business records were intended to obscure a second crime. In this case, that second crime appears to be the use of the funds to advance Trump’s presidential campaign allegedly in violation of campaign finance laws.

Key figures in the Trump indictment​

Here are some of the people involved as the case against former President Donald Trump moves forward.

90

Michael Cohen
Trump’s former attorney testified in 2018 that he made a hush-money payment on behalf of Trump.
90

Stormy Daniels
The **** actress is said to have received $130,000 for her silence about an affair with Trump.
90

Alvin Bragg
The Manhattan DA took office in January 2022 and inherited the investigation.
90

Allen Weisselberg
Prosecutors gave the ex-Trump Organization CFO immunity in their hush-money probe in 2018.
90

Joe Tacopina
A vocal member of Trump’s legal team, he began representing Trump earlier this year.
90

Susan Necheles
She is one of Trump’s lawyers who was on the defense team in the Trump Organization trial.
90

Robert Costello
Cohen’s former legal adviser cast aspersions on Cohen’s credibility before the grand jury.
90

Karen McDougal
The model is another woman who received “hush money” for her involvement with Trump.
90

David Pecker
The former National Enquirer CEO has been linked to Cohen’s efforts to pay off Daniels and McDougal.

The strongest evidence of such a link to politics may be the timing: After months of demands, the money was wired to Daniels’ lawyer on Oct. 27, 2016, just days before the 2016 presidential election.

What are the possible holes in the prosecution’s case?

It is difficult to assess the case against Trump without knowing the exact charges or all of the evidence that prosecutors have marshaled during an investigation that has lasted more than four years. But based on publicly available information, legal experts have identified several features of the case that may present stumbling blocks as prosecutors seek a guilty verdict.

For starters, Cohen is not the strongest possible witness for prosecutors. He’s provided a lot of the evidence and testimony needed to bring the case, which investigators have gone to great lengths to authenticate. But his credibility is open to challenge since he pleaded guilty in 2018 to nine felonies and was sentenced to three years in federal prison. He’s also repeatedly expressed extreme bitterness towards Trump, even running a podcast he titled “Mea Culpa,” an allusion to his regrets over his time as Trump’s ally.

The case also dates to 2016 and 2017, so it is more than five years old. Some of the delay can be readily explained — pressing a criminal case against Trump while he was in office would have been difficult and perhaps impossible. But it’s been more than two years now since Trump left the White House.

Trump could argue that prosecutors waited too long. New York’s statute of limitations for most felonies is five years, but there are some exceptions to that deadline, including if the person being charged was living out of state.

Another potential difficulty: Prosecutors may have to prove that Trump knew the arrangement was illegal. Trump could argue that he fairly assumed that Cohen, as an attorney, was executing the payments and related paperwork in a manner that was lawful.

Will Trump remain free? Can he campaign while under indictment?

That will be up to the state-court judge assigned to Trump’s case, but it seems unlikely that prosecutors would seek to detain the former president or restrict his travel in the U.S. while the case is pending. There is no legal impediment to him continuing his presidential campaign while facing criminal charges — or even if he were jailed.

If Trump won the presidency while facing charges or a conviction, the legalities become considerably more murky. There are serious constitutional questions about whether a state court could keep someone elected to federal office from serving.

How will the indictment affect the other ongoing Trump-focused investigations?

The short answer is: Not much. There’s no reason to think the indictment in Manhattan will influence the trajectory of several other probes that present an acute risk of more criminal charges for Trump. A grand jury in Fulton County, Ga., is examining his bid to overturn the election results in that state, and at the federal level, special counsel Jack Smith is leading twin probes into Trump’s role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and his retention of government documents after his presidency.

ormally, a federal criminal case against Trump — if it were filed — would allow federal prosecutors to take precedence over any local case or cases.

Concurrent criminal proceedings against Trump would inevitably cause some logistical problems, but typically the feds and local prosecutors try to work out any conflicts.

How long will it take Trump to be brought to trial?

It will, by necessity, take many months to commence a trial of a former president of the United States. Even if both sides were eager to proceed to trial quickly, ironing out legal and constitutional questions would likely stretch out over the next year and into the 2024 primary season.

Add to that Trump’s penchant — in nearly every legal matter he’s embroiled in — to seek to delay and prolong proceedings whenever possible.

Trump’s lawyers could try to move the case to federal court, arguing that at least some of the payments to Cohen took place while Trump was president and therefore a state court should have no authority to resolve the matter. Trump also could seek to move the trial to a different courthouse elsewhere in New York state. And he could try to have the indictment dismissed or reduced. All of these pre-trial motions will take time to resolve.

A criminal tax case the Manhattan district attorney’s office filed against the Trump Organization in the same court in 2021 took about 15 months to get to trial. A jury convicted two Trump companies on all 17 felony charges last December. The issues in the new case are narrower, but the focus on Trump personally seems certain to drag things out.
 
.
Great day to be an American! :usflag:

339413608_602817745054349_2265515829281160331_n.jpg


Trump pleads not guilty to 34 felony charges

Former President Donald Trump has pleaded not guilty to multiple counts in the New York investigation into his alleged role in a hush money scheme.
By ERICA ORDEN, KYLE CHENEY and JOSH GERSTEIN
04/04/2023 01:25 PM EDT

NEW YORK — Prosecutors in Manhattan say former president Donald Trump orchestrated a sweeping scheme to bury damaging allegations about extramarital affairs — which had been set to emerge before the 2016 presidential election — and then tried to cover it up by falsifying company records.

“During and in furtherance of his candidacy for President, the Defendant and others agreed to identify and suppress negative stories about him,” according to charging documents unveiled Tuesday by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Trump pleaded not guilty Tuesday to 34 felony charges connected to his role in the alleged scheme, a plea that came at the conclusion of an extraordinary trip to the courthouse for the former president. Trump, the first former president ever indicted, delivered his plea in a Manhattan courtroom a few hours after turning himself in to authorities.

All 34 counts he faces are for “falsifying business records,” a crime that carries a sentence of up to four years in prison when charged as a felony. Judges often sentence first-time offenders to probation, particularly in non-violent cases. But Bragg said the case was an important one, meant to punish Trump’s effort to conceal alleged crimes.

“We cannot and will not normalize serious criminal conduct,” he said at a press conference after the indictment was unsealed, emphasizing that the specific crime with which Trump was charged is “the bread and butter of our white-collar work.”


The charging documents suggest that prosecutors are relying on witness testimony, business records and a recorded conversation between Trump and his then-attorney Michael Cohen. After the election, prosecutors say, say Trump and Cohen concocted a plan to reimburse Cohen for making one of the hush money payments on Trump’s behalf. They tried to mask the reimbursement by mixing it with other payments to Cohen that he could categorize as income rather than a repayment, according to prosecutors. Read more

Let's talk about Trump, NY, blunders, and election chances....​

 
. .




565941


His supporters
565945


The disaster is that the case is a misdemeanor and ended considering that the statute of limitations for tax evasion cases is 6 years and the Attorney General linked it to a federal case related to violating the election law that the federal government itself dropped.. it is laughable..The case will be dropped for Trump and will increase his chances of winning the next elections..
 
. . .
Pakistani groups and Muslim groups in general need to make more inroads with Republicans, because they are being taken for granted by democrats.

The more republicans are starting (many haven’t fully gotten there as the following video shows) to realize they need to find ideological allies from amongst those they can.

Just like Indians have people in both parties, Pakistani need people in both parties so they can get their interests (being treated fully equally to the mainstream, which is mostly the case) met regardless of who’s in power, so Muslims don’t have to worry about who gets elected and can focus on progressing up the ladders of academia and business.
Important; from 17:26-17:40 Republicans know why Muslims vote democrat. They have to give up on this atmosphere of fear to let people vote on the issues.

Starting now, perhaps in a generation, Muslims will be elected to office, as easily as many other minority.

Biden won the 2020 election by small margins in many states. Democrats won by small margins in the 2022 midterms. Now is the time for Muslims to ask more from both parties if they want the Muslim vote.


“. . . and nearest among them in love to the believers will you find those who say, ‘We are Christians,’ because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant” (5:82).

“O you who believe! Be helpers of God—as Jesus the son of Mary said to the Disciples, ‘Who will be my helpers in (the work of) God?’ Said the disciples, ‘We are God’s helpers!’ Then a portion of the Children of Israel believed, and a portion disbelieved. But We gave power to those who believed, against their enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed” (61:14).


“O People of the Book! Come to common terms as between us and you: that we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with Him; that we erect not, from among ourselves, Lords and patrons other than Allah” (3:64).

“And let not the enmity of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to piety: and fear Allah” (5:8).

“And argue not with the people of the Scripture unless it be in (a way) that is better, except with such of them as do wrong” (29:46).

“And do good, indeed Allah loves the doers of good” (2:195).
 
Last edited:
.
Election 2024

The United States will hold a presidential election on November 5, 2024. This will be the 60th presidential election in United States history.

List of Democratic candidates:

Joe Biden incumbent president of the United States, announced he would run for re-election on April 25, 2023.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. a lawyer and author, announced his candidacy on April 5, 2023.

Marianne Williamson 2020 presidential candidate and author, announced her candidacy on February 23, 2023


So far there are 14 Republican candidates, seven Whites, three Blacks, three Brown and one Orange.

List of Republican candidates:

Doug Burgum
the governor of North Dakota, announced his candidacy on June 7, 2023.

Chris Christie former governor of New Jersey, announced his candidacy on June 6, 2023.

Ron DeSantis the governor of Florida, announced his candidacy on May 24, 2023.

Larry Elder a talk radio host announced his candidacy on April 20, 2023.

Nikki Haley former U.N. Ambassador and South Carolina Governor, announced her candidacy on February 14, 2023.

Will Hurd former U.S. Representative from Texas, announced his candidacy on June 22, 2023.

Asa Hutchinson former Arkansas Governor, announced his candidacy on April 2, 2023.

Perry Johnson a business owner and author, announced his candidacy on March 2, 2023.

Mike Pence former vice president of the United States, announced his candidacy on June 7, 2023.

Vivek Ramaswamy entrepreneur and political commentator, announced his candidacy on February 21, 2023.

Tim Scott a United States senator from South Carolina, announced his candidacy on May 22, 2023.

Corey Stapleton former Montana Secretary of State, announced his candidacy on November 11, 2022.

Francis Suarez the Mayor of Miami, announced his candidacy on June 15, 2023.

Donald Trump former U.S. President, announced his candidacy on November 15, 2022.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom