desiman
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Messages
- 3,957
- Reaction score
- 0
What does this have to do with 'denying the facts'? Are you contesting what I wrote and if so why? You can't just rant about 'denying the facts' when you yourself have not refuted a single line I wrote.
Who made it a crime? Even if Pakistan had supplied technology to NK (which it did not, AQ Khan allegedly did) it committed no crime since it is not a member of the NPT. You cannot make up your own facts and laws to vilify Pakistan just because you feel like it.
And why is that worse than the West supplying nuclear capabilities to Israel (that also has occupied and enslaved millions of Palestinians) as well as Pakistan? Why do those nations get to be on the NSG despite their own history of proliferation?
And why is supplying nuclear technology to a nation like India, that has occupied and subjugated millions of Kashmiris in violation of the UNSC resolutions and conditions of accession (plebiscite) not an even bigger 'crime against humanity'?
---------- Post added at 02:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:18 PM ----------
A comment that addresses none of the points I raised - where exactly in this post of mine that you responded to did you see Pakistan mentioned?
i dont buy even one point you made, US's and NSG's concerns regarding Pakistan's nuclear program at legitimate whether you like it or not. It has nothing to to with India or Kashmir or any other useless rant that are being offered up as a defense here. There are enormous risk in giving Pakistan any sensitive tech and the NSG is well aware of that. The NSG will not approve Pakistan, simple as that, mark my words. Please dont come back to the same old Kashmir issue again and dilute the discussion , we have already discussed that many times. The international community does not buy that argument.