What's new

US gives Pakistan a free pass — and $1 billion — by ignoring LeT, LeJ

And do you have any clue what the Coalition Support Fund is being used for? Supporting the Afghan Taliban and the 'good' terror organizations like the LeT and JeM who are the Establishment's 'strategic assets' and stockpiling weapon systems/arms/ammo/equipment and mostly funding the nuclear program for a future war against India. The rest is going into the pockets of the corrupt, across the board.
Go and read post # 5 it will answer all your quarries
 
.
And do you have any clue what the Coalition Support Fund is being used for? Supporting the Afghan Taliban and the 'good' terror organizations like the LeT and JeM who are the Establishment's 'strategic assets' and stockpiling weapon systems/arms/ammo/equipment and mostly funding the nuclear program for a future war against India. The rest is going into the pockets of the corrupt, across the board.

Errr, once you stop making conspiracy theories, do bother to visit US AID site, download the pdf file on Pak Aid which contains the data of complete reimbursements to Pakistan and how much gone to army and how much to civilians and once you done reading, you will find that in 10-12 years, civilian (sector) got more aid than Military sector
 
.
you know some girls like bad boys only
but i do insist Mr moodi brings up these issues including Dawood Imrahim's latestes location found to be in Clifton Karachi, when he meets Mr. Obama

i don't think modi is such a person that he will dicsuss this issue with obama like manmohan does. if he wants kill dawood, he would send spies to kill him. but i think modi will use dawood and hafeez saeed to project pakistan as a harbourer of terrorists. dawood is past his prime. india doesn't need him. he is more of liability to pak
 
.
first time in the history of humankind, a leader of one country asked for help with toilets from another country.
do think anyone will take you seriously after that request.
Your country faces the exact same issues, the only difference is India has a leader who is addressing these issues head on and working to improve the situation.

If Modi had not voiced the issue of sanitation would that have made fixed the problem? No. Pointing out there is a problem is the first step to addressing it.

Modi has set a 2019 deadline for 100% access to sanitation, what is Pakistan's deadline for the same objective?

Laugh and belittle all you want buddy, your mentality will keep Pakistan in the dirt, Modi's will see India progress.
 
.
Americans are only interested in their objectives all along playing on Indian priorities in the region. The way Americans deal with both Pakistan and India shows they only want to secure their interests, not India's or Pakistan's.

At this moment, America needs Pakistan more than India. Once Americans believe they dont need Pakistan, which will be soon, they can legislate to address Indian concerns. Then Indians will jump in frenzied state that Americans are doing for them which they themselves couldn't.

Both India and Pakistan couldn't be more wrong than this. They must talk to each other so that no third force can play up their differences to get their objectives.
 
.
i don't think modi is such a person that he will dicsuss this issue with obama like manmohan does. if he wants kill dawood, he would send spies to kill him. but i think modi will use dawood and hafeez saeed to project pakistan as a harbourer of terrorists. dawood is past his prime. india doesn't need him. he is more of liability to pak
I don't agree at all. The same arguments could have been used about OBL but going after him served its purpose. Every day Hafiz Saeed but particularly Dawood is allowed to roam free and out of reach of the Indian justice system is another day India is made to look weak and impotent. Getting Dawood would be the strongest signal India could send to anyone who would do India harm- you mess with us, we will get you. This is the message the 2011 Abbotobad mission sent to the world.


As for using these guys as a tool to malign Pakistan on the world stage, they don't need any outside assistance with this, they are doing that all by themselves. Maligning Pakistan serves little utility to India in itself.
 
.
^^
before election I heard all the ramblings about how tough Modi will set Pakistan straight in his first week, fix LOC and will bring Dawood back on a platter or send his killing squad. I guess things changed now.
 
.
Americans are only interested in their objectives all along playing on Indian priorities in the region. The way Americans deal with both Pakistan and India shows they only want to secure their interests, not India's or Pakistan's.
Did anyone doubt this? Nations are ONLY concerned with serving their OWN interests.

^^
before election I heard all the ramblings about how tough Modi will set Pakistan straight in his first week, fix LOC and will bring Dawood back on a platter or send his killing squad. I guess things changed now.
Welcome to politics. Politicians say one thing to get into power and change their tune once they are in office. Obama had promised to close Guantanamo Bay within 100 days of entering office, here we are almost 6 years later and the camp is still running.

I actually thought all that chest-thumping during the elections was cringe worthy and that Modi has acted in a much more statesmen like way since entering office and I'm glad to see. Had he been the same guy he was during the election process he'd have been a throughly unworthy leader of 1.25 billion people.
 
.
I don't agree at all. The same arguments could have been used about OBL but going after him served its purpose. Every day Hafiz Saeed but particularly Dawood is allowed to roam free and out of reach of the Indian justice system is another day India is made to look weak and impotent. Getting Dawood would be the strongest signal India could send to anyone who would do India harm- you mess with us, we will get you. This is the message the 2011 Abbotobad mission sent to the world.


As for using these guys as a tool to malign Pakistan on the world stage, they don't need any outside assistance with this, they are doing that all by themselves. Maligning Pakistan serves little utility to India in itself.

yes...if india gets dawood and HS it is great, but i am not that optimistic about pak handing them over to india. they hid osama from americans inspite of taking billions as aid, they are doing the same with dawood and HS. in this circumstances the best strategy is to project pak as a den from terrorists
 
.
yes...if india gets dawood and HS it is great, but i am not that optimistic about pak handing them over to india. they hid osama from americans inspite of taking billions as aid, they are doing the same with dawood and HS. in this circumstances the best strategy is to project pak as a den from terrorists
I hold out ZERO hope of Pakistan handing anyone over to India. Like you pointed out, the Pakistanis continued to harbour OBL despite tremendous pressure being applied by the USG. India could never dream of having such leverage on the Pakistanis so there's next to no possibility for India to get its way.

And, like I said, I don't see what good maligning Pakistan's image can do. India needs to impose a cost on Pakistan for its continuous anti-India activities and thus should take tangible measures to isolate Pakistan on the global stage both diplomatically and economically.
 
.
Last edited:
.
forget how you send to diplomats to US begging India to stop killing PA .....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_India–Pakistan_border_skirmishes

we begged once, and you keep begging even after they showed they dont give a $hit and you ask for toilets then lol

Welcome to politics. Politicians say one thing to get into power and change their tune once they are in office. Obama had promised to close Guantanamo Bay within 100 days of entering office, here we are almost 6 years later and the camp is still running.

I actually thought all that chest-thumping during the elections was cringe worthy and that Modi has acted in a much more statesmen like way since entering office and I'm glad to see. Had he been the same guy he was during the election process he'd have been a throughly unworthy leader of 1.25 billion people.

although 180 million people were hoping he would, such a disappointment
 
.
Then we have to simultaneously develop other channels of engagement while continuing to engage with the USA on a diplomatically friendly relation.

Hence, we will continue to expand our energy cooperation with Russia, China, Iran and even Venezuela in order to ensure that this is a well rounded international game.

first time in the history of humankind, a leader of one country asked for help with toilets from another country.
do think anyone will take you seriously after that request.

And what is wrong in investing in toilets and public hygiene?

What wrong has the Prime Minister said by asking to fight infections, disease and ailment through developing better sanitary standards in a country of 125 crores?

A national leader is a leader who has the courage to pick up smallest of issues and make it into a nationwide revolution, a thought that people want to follow and change for the good of the country.

Not just roam around in Mercedes Benz VIP versions, fly down to different countries, eat caviar and drink fine wine.
 
.
In my opinion.This is a good thing.
This will maintain US influence over Pakistan.
 
.
Maybe the US is letting Pakistan do things a bit at a time. Maybe they ignore such groups, as they pose no threat to the US.

What is known US/Pakistan ties are strong and will remain so.

As for LJ and LT, they are both scum and it would far more fitting for us to be recognised as a state that fights all terror, not just the terror that afflicts allies.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom