What's new

US an Arab allies begin airstrikes in Syria

The title should be changed to the US and its allies airstrikes against the ISIS and the child murderer of Syria Asshead and his thugs.

Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan and the UAE are taking part in this mission.

lol you're dreaming your puppet governments and their master are attacking your wahabi brothers. Remember the tantrum Bandar did when your american masters refused to bomb SAA.
 
.
If anything, the sources you quoted prove what I have been saying for a long time now here, marking atheists as terrorists was met with a huge number of Saudis coming out in Twitter than the law became useless in fact 9% of the Saudi population is Atheist, the highest in the region. You have to learn that some laws are passed in Saudi Arabia to appease the religious establishment, but they are never really carried out at all. Here:

View attachment 82132

So you can take the sources you consider "credible" and know where to put them.

Fake map. South Sudan and Saudi Arabia are never more atheist than Ukraine. Is it from Gallup?
 
. .

2f2dc177fed74625c7d6c31b2c8a5921.jpg


8c3311c835b6807339727f06679a50fd.jpg
 
.
September 25, 2014

f0b3cf420f24631f33674e358d7618a0.jpg

A handout picture from the US department of defence shows a US navy F-18E Super Hornet refueling from a KC-135 Stratotanker over northern Iraq after conducting air strikes in Syria. US Air Force/EPA

UAE, Saudi and US strike ISIL oil refineries

The US, UAE and Saudi Arabia have bombed oil refineries operated by ISIL in Syria to choke off their funding, killing more than a dozen militants.

Fighter jets from the three countries attacked the oil installations in eastern Syria, broadening their campaign beyond military targets to economic assets.

Meanwhile, France launched airstrikes on Thursday in Iraq and pledged more support for Syrian opposition forces, increasing its fight against extremists after the beheading of a French hostage.

And Iraq’s prime minister said his country’s intelligence network had uncovered a plot for an imminent attack on underground rail systems in the US and Paris.

Haider Al Abadi said he had been told of the plot by Baghdad, and that it was the work of ISIL foreign fighters.

Asked if the attacks had been thwarted, Mr Al Abadi said, “No.”

But two senior US security officials said the US had no information to support the threat.


ISIL, which has imposed its brutal rule over large parts of Syria and Iraq, has been using such small-scale mobile refineries to generate up to US$2 million (Dh7.34m) in revenues a day, Washington said.

Militants seized and set fire to a cement factory in Syria owned by French building giant Lafarge near the Turkish border, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said yesterday.

The strikes against the oil refineries killed 14 militants but also left five civilians dead, including a child, the British-based monitoring group said.

It said fighters from Europe, Arab countries, Chechnya and Turkey made up by far most of the more than 140 militants killed since the US-led raids began in Syria.

The latest strikes came as US president Barack Obama urged leaders at the UN General Assembly to join the coalition, and convinced the Security Council to back a resolution to stem the flow of foreign fighters joining ISIL.

Belgium and The Netherlands committed warplanes to Iraq and Britain said its parliament would vote on Friday on doing the same.

ISIL has committed atrocities including mass executions of captured Iraqi soldiers, forced conversions of non-Muslims and filmed beheadings of western hostages.

The executed hostages included two US journalists and a British aid worker.

The Philippines said on Thursday it would not negotiate with a militant group threatening to behead one of two German hostages unless a huge ransom was paid and Berlin halted support for the campaign against ISIL.

The US-led coalition has carried out about 20 strikes in Syria since the start of the week. Washington has launched nearly 200 strikes in Iraq since early August.

The raids in Syria have hit ISIL troop positions, command centres, training compounds and vehicles, in their regional stronghold of Raqqa and near the Syria-Iraq border.

Pentagon spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby said Saudi and UAE warplanes played the leading role in Wednesday’s attack on the oil installations, devoting more planes and dumping more bombs than US forces.

Ten warplanes from the two countries flew with six US aircraft in the raids, with 80 per cent of the bomb tonnage delivered by Saudi and UAE planes, Adm Kirby said.

He said it is too early to say that the coalition was winning against ISIL, pointing to the group’s continued access to financing, volunteers and weapons even after the bombings in Syria and Iraq.

“Your question gets at ‘how do you know you’re winning?’” Adm Kirby said. “And what I’m telling you is it’s going to take us a while to be able to say that.

“Even after the hits they’ve taken – and they have been hit – they still have financing at their fingertips. They still have plenty of volunteers. They still have plenty of weapons and vehicles and the ability to move around.”

In New York, Mr Obama led a UN Security Council meeting that unanimously adopted a binding resolution to turn back the flow of foreign fighters heading to Iraq and Syria.

It requires all countries to adopt laws that would make it a serious crime for their nationals to join militant groups such as ISIL and Al Qaeda affiliate the Al Nusra Front, or risk economic sanctions or military action.

More than 50 countries have joined the US-led coalition, and in recent days more have promised concrete military support.

Belgium and the Netherlands said they would each send six F-16 fighter bombers to take part in the air campaign in Iraq.

The Netherlands will also deploy 250 military personnel and 130 trainers for the Iraqi military, and Greece said on Thursday that it would send arms to Kurdish forces battling the jihadists.

Meanwhile, nine people were arrested in London on suspicion of encouraging terrorism and belonging to a banned extremist Islamist organisation.

There had been fears the airstrikes could inadvertently help Syrian president Bashar Al Assad’s regime, which is locked in a civil war lasting three and a half years, which the UN says has left more than 190,000 dead.

The militants have posed the most serious threat to his regime, although Washington has vowed to arm and equip moderate rebels as part of the anti-ISIL campaign.

On Thusday a Syrian security source said regime troops had managed to recapture the strategically important town of Adra near the capital that was seized by rebels in December.

UAE, Saudi and US strike ISIL oil refineries | The National
 
.
September 25, 2014

UAE ‘naturally’ at forefront of terror war
Minister underlines importance of a collective response to ‘common threat’ and showing political will to confront it

The decision by the UAE to take part in the air strikes against the militants of Daesh (the self-proclaimed Islamic State) was a natural outcome of the country’s view that it was essential that there should be “a collective response to terror,” said Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Dr Anwar Gargash.

In an interview on CNN with Wolf Blitzer, Dr Gargash held forth on the UAE’s position. “It was a natural decision; we’ve always said that we have to have a collective response to terror. And it was only natural that we would be at the forefront of it.”

Declining to give any specifics of the UAE’s role, he added: “I would say that the coalition, I think, has been very effective. We will continue to work together — also to be more effective, to eradicate this common threat.”

There would, Dr Gargash said, “definitely” be more airstrikes against Daesh targets. “I think this will be more or less as part of a concerted military operation, a collective one. And we are committed to it, I think. And this is a common threat.”

He stressed: “I think the important thing is the political will.”

“Putting this coalition together, I think, has been a great achievement for the [US] administration, for all of us together, because this is a common threat. And I think it’s extremely important that we deal with it collectively.”

Asked by Blitzer to comment on the participation of Qatar in the air strikes, Dr Gargash said: “I think it’s indicative of the threat that everybody feels is common. Nobody is basically immune. Everybody is threatened, the way of life, the values. This is, I think, a danger to all of us, terrorism. And I think this is indicative of how the coalition was built, on the sense that we need to act, we can’t be passive.”

The UAE, he said, is “a full partner, politically, logistically. Politically, of course, we support this effort wholeheartedly. Logistically, we are also host to an Australian force that also plays a role here; other forces, also. And, of course, we’ve got our pilots, and we’ve got our assets, also, in this fight.”

The role of Australia, he said, was “an essential part also of this coalition building.” Asked by Blitzer to comment on whether the so-called Khorasan group, an offshoot of Al Qaida, which is said to be making threats against the United States, was also making threats against the UAE, Dr Gargash replied: “Yes, definitely.”

“In a chaotic situation, you will always have groups and offshoots and various groups that have the same cause but will not necessarily be organised as the same organisation. So I’m not surprised that there is this group or any other group. It’s a very chaotic situation with a security vacuum,” he added.

In the current situation, he added, “I think we all have to be vigilant. But I think taking action is better than not taking action or delaying action. So I think vigilance is expected of all of us. But I think we’re doing all the right things in order to thwart this challenge once and for all.

“From our perspective,” he said, “this is a battle against terror. This is a battle about extremism, about violence that terror brings with it. And I think this is all an operational thing. I mean, definitely, we’re there not only about Daesh, we’re there against terrorism. “Terror is a challenge to our way of life, to our stability. And I think it can cover itself under different names. It knows no geography.”

Asked whether he agreed with statements from leading US senators that there should also be action against the air power of Syria’s Bashar Al Assad if such resources continued to be used against Syrian civilians, Dr Gargash stressed: “We think of this operation in terms of an operation against terror. There has to be, also, a part of this operation [that] involves a lot of political work. Definitely, I think we are with the idea that the current regime in Syria should not benefit from this, but we think, also, a lot of political work has to be done. There’s a lot of legwork to also pursue along the line as we pursue the military option.”

The objective of the UAE is to work towards stability in the region, he said. “We want stability. We want to end this terror challenge. And I don’t think we want anybody to benefit from that challenge because Daesh is hit or this other group is hit.”

In terms of other options besides the use of air power, Dr Gargash said: “The UAE is part of a coalition. And the UAE believes that a lot of the political legwork that can be done on the ground will bring us good alternatives here to cover whatever expected vacuum there is.” He added: “We’re in it for the long haul we are committed. I think it’s too early now to really put a real assessment of how long we’re looking at. We’re in on Day One [of the strikes on militants]. But definitely, we need to do the job right.”

UAE ‘naturally’ at forefront of terror war | GulfNews.com
 
. .
Last edited:
.
If anything, the sources you quoted prove what I have been saying for a long time now here, marking atheists as terrorists was met with a huge number of Saudis coming out in Twitter than the law became useless in fact 9% of the Saudi population is Atheist, the highest in the region. You have to learn that some laws are passed in Saudi Arabia to appease the religious establishment, but they are never really carried out at all. Here:

View attachment 82132

So you can take the sources you consider "credible" and know where to put them.
It does not seem to be correct, bro. North European countries like Sweden have much much more atheists than what is said in this map. Also, Azerbaijan has many atheists, like other ex-soviet/Eastern European countries, but the map shows below 5% which is obviously wrong;)
 
.
Quote :

Pentagon says IS air strikes are 'just the beginning'

Jeremy Binnie, London - IHS Jane's Defence Weekly
25 September 2014


8acfb911e18819a9b277ca2b92582a79.jpg

A slide released by the US Department of Defense (DoD) shows one of the oil refineries before and after it was hit in airstrikes carried out by the US, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. (US DoD)


US officials are warning that the airstrikes that the US and Arab allies began against the Islamic State (IS) in Syria on 22 September will not result in a swift victory.

"This is just the beginning," Pentagon spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby told reporters on 25 September. "There's no way this group is going to be defeated solely through airpower or even military power."

Rear Adm Kirby was speaking after outlining the airstrikes that US, Saudi, and Emirati aircraft carried out against 12 modular oil refineries in eastern Syria the night before. "It's dramatic and that footage looks pretty cool, but this is going to take time. This is not a short-term effort."

The first wave of strikes on the night of 22-23 September consisted of more than 40 BGM-109 Tomahawk land-attack missiles fired from the USS Arleigh Burke in the Red Sea and the USS Philippine Sea in the Gulf against three groups of targets near the cities of Aleppo, Al-Raqqah, and Dayr al-Zawr.

A second wave of manned and unmanned aircraft hit targets around Al-Raqqah, including command posts, communication sites, logistic sites, and vehicle parks. This was predominately a US Air Force (USAF) mission involving F-22 Raptors on their first-ever combat mission, Rockwell B-1B Lancer bombers, F-16s, F-15E Strike Eagles, and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

A final wave of US Navy F/A-18 and USAF F-16s then hit multiple IS targets along Syria's eastern border with Iraq. Aircraft from four Arab air forces were involved in these strikes.

The Arab allies appear to have been more involved in the strikes on the night of 24-25 September, when 12 small oil refineries were targeted in eastern Syria. Rear Adm Kirby said that 10 of the 16 aircraft that carried out the mission were from Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and launched 23 of the 41 precision-guided munitions (or 80% of the total tonnage of ordnance) used in the attack.

"Producing between 300 and 500 barrels of refined petroleum a day… these small-scale oil refineries provide fuel to run [IS] operations, money to finance their continued attacks throughout Iraq and Syria, and they are an economic asset to support future operations," Rear Adm Kirby said.

He described the initial bombing as "strategic attacks meant specifically to get at the ways that this group sustains, leads and controls itself". While he said that more such strikes would follow, he added that a "target-rich environment will become less rich over time".

When asked what forces on the ground were in a position to exploit the weakening of the IS in Syria, Rear Adm Kirby pointed to the programme to train and equip comparatively moderate opposition groups. "That's going to take some time," he noted.

While he said that forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad had not been seen attempting to take control of the IS facilities or infrastructure that had been targeted in the airstrikes, he dodged a hypothetical question about what the US would do if Assad's forces attempted to exploit the situation.


...
 
.
Funny part is that Americans bombed Nusra positions in Idlib and Aleppo (which opposes IS), but did not bomb IS which attack Kurds in Kobani.

I dont know what are these strikes about but surely not about protection of civilians from IS.

Don't judge too quickly ;) They are targeting their sources of income, like oil, and also killing them in big numbers. No one can fully protect civilians without using forces on Syrian ground, and just by using air strikes. About ISIS-YPG aka PKK conflict, they are both terrorists and its not USA business to act in favor of one of them by bombing the front of the other one ;)
 
.
All I see is terrorist in the skies bombing Syrian infrastructure to the ground for dubious reasons they planted them self into the region in first place because civilized nations wouldn't let the terrorists bomb the Syrian people an nation on the fabricated narrative of "protecting the Syrian people from an evil Assad regime".
 
.
All I see is terrorist in the skies bombing Syrian infrastructure to the ground for dubious reasons they planted them self into the region in first place because civilized nations wouldn't let the terrorists bomb the Syrian people an nation on the fabricated narrative of "protecting the Syrian people from an evil Assad regime".

B-but you're an ISIS supporter! A muslim Islamic infidel tourist who wants to behead me! Stop hating the Jews!
 
.
All I see is terrorist in the skies bombing Syrian infrastructure to the ground for dubious reasons they planted them self into the region in first place because civilized nations wouldn't let the terrorists bomb the Syrian people an nation on the fabricated narrative of "protecting the Syrian people from an evil Assad regime".

All I see is Russia can't do crap. Where all those posters who say Russia is scaring U.S. from bombing Syria? Thank Assad for giving the U.S. another excuse after Russia pounced on the Syrians giving up chemical weapons in return for not getting bombed. I can post an article of Russia condemning the bombing in case anybody ask.
 
.
Et voilà ! :pop: :butcher:


U.S. Considers a No-Fly Zone to Protect Civilians From Airstrikes by Syria

By HELENE COOPER and ANNE BARNARD
SEPT. 26, 2014

WASHINGTON —
The Obama administration has not ruled out establishing a no-fly zone over northeastern Syria to protect civilians from airstrikes by the Syrian government, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Friday.

Mr. Hagel and General Dempsey indicated they are open to considering the request of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey for a buffer zone along the Turkish-Syrian border, where tens of thousands of Syrians have sought refuge. Mr. Hagel said, “We’ve discussed all these possibilities and will continue to talk about what the Turks believe they will require.” He said 1.3 million Syrian refugees are now in Turkey.

General Dempsey added that “a buffer zone might at some point become a possibility,” but he said it was not imminent. Creating a buffer, or no-fly zone, would require warplanes to disable the Syrian government’s air defense system through airstrikes.



The New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/27/w...html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes&_r=1
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom