What's new

Untold Story of East Pakistan 1971

@ I saw the liberation war physically may be in a limited vision due to my age limit.
@ I saw the Pakistan Army, Para-miltary forces including Razakar and Al-Badre fought well on their side.
@ I saw Mukti Bahini also fought well and crippled the morale of Pakistani Army.
@ Finally the Indian Army came so long they had been planning, sheltering, training, arming and finally fighting with the Pakistan Army and won the game.

And now we the Bengalees won our independant. Now the question arises, are we really secured now ? ?????

I remembered in those days people used to get at least good jobs on merit basis. A gurdian could say I want to make my son as doctor, engineer, Armed Force Officer, etc. Now, see the present situation , everywhere is corruption, our large scale industries are finished. Everywhere is grouping and most important thing is our real soveriegnity. Are we real sovereign now ? Can we achieve it ? How ?
 
can some tell what are the statistical points hamid mentioned? Too lazy to see the whole video.

---------- Post added at 04:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:12 PM ----------

If it is the same as the one in military history sub-forum, then don't bother.
 
@ I saw the liberation war physically may be in a limited vision due to my age limit.
@ I saw the Pakistan Army, Para-miltary forces including Razakar and Al-Badre fought well on their side.
@ I saw Mukti Bahini also fought well and crippled the morale of Pakistani Army.
@ Finally the Indian Army came so long they had been planning, sheltering, training, arming and finally fighting with the Pakistan Army and won the game.

And now we the Bengalees won our independant. Now the question arises, are we really secured now ? ?????

I remembered in those days people used to get at least good jobs on merit basis. A gurdian could say I want to make my son as doctor, engineer, Armed Force Officer, etc. Now, see the present situation , everywhere is corruption, our large scale industries are finished. Everywhere is grouping and most important thing is our real soveriegnity. Are we real sovereign now ? Can we achieve it ? How ?

I remember a few old fellas making a point that we Indians were better under british. Your post sounds familiar to me.
In case of bangladesh, I can certainly say, there is very low chance of having a famine there. Even with low rainfall, climate change and all. You will simply not allow it.
British had better sense of fairplay, as long as both side are non white.
 
1) @I saw the liberation war physically may be in a limited vision due to my age limit.
@ I saw the Pakistan Army, Para-miltary forces including Razakar and Al-Badre fought well on their side.
@ I saw Mukti Bahini also fought well and crippled the morale of Pakistani Army.
@ Finally the Indian Army came so long they had been planning, sheltering, training, arming and finally fighting with the Pakistan Army and won the game.

2) And now we the Bengalees won our independant. Now the question arises, are we really secured now ? ?????

I remembered in those days people used to get at least good jobs on merit basis. A gurdian could say I want to make my son as doctor, engineer, Armed Force Officer, etc. Now, see the present situation , everywhere is corruption, our large scale industries are finished. Everywhere is grouping and most important thing is our real soveriegnity. Are we real sovereign now ? Can we achieve it ? How ?
The 1st part of your post is a statement that is based on what you have seen. But, the 2nd part is a little weird. This part is a meaningles jargon. Do you think an united Pakisatan would have given us everything that you are complaing here? Population was only about 70 million and now it is 150 million. How do you propose that an united Pakistan would have solved these problems? This part was supposed to feed itself with its own resource. It was not the duty of the other part.

I can only say that the situation would have been quite opposite. Now-a-days, Bangladeshis go to middle east to work. Can you say how many of us went there during Pakistan time, and in contrast how many of west Pakistanis went there?

Your talk about sovereignty. Why do you think a few posts in a discussion forum are the proofs that we do not have a sovereignty? We are certainly a free, independent and sovereign country. We have established democracy. We will keep on strengthening it. All our foreign exchange was used in the past to develop and industrialize west. Where was our sovereignty then?

When the country separated, unfortunately the golden fibere happened to have been replaced with chemical fiberes. After the independence, we had a very few items to export. But, now we are surging up, we will industrialize our country step by step and we will become a country that will be respected by others.

And now, you have come with a delicate word 'SOVEREIGNTY' to malign our independence. It is unacceptable.
 
Lets see is Bangladesh going through a war? Did Bangladesh have one of the worst floods in history happen to them? Does Bangladesh have neighboring country whose been in war for decades now? Does Bangladesh have a hostile neighbor who is trying their best to undermine them? Does Bangladesh have the US breathing down their neck? Is Bangladesh a multi-ethnic/religious country?

So like a typical indian troll, you don't look at the circumstances of things but just want to spew hatred against Pakistan.

Conclusion: you fail

Dance Let me answer your question one by one.

@ It is true that we are not at war but we had been fighting counter insurgency for last 27 years in Chittagong Hill Tracts.

@ Natural calamaties is a part of life. Every alternate years we are facing flood and cyclone. Pakistan faced this flood after long timemay be after 3/4 decades.

@ Who says that our neighbouring country India is friendly to us. It is only on papers. each and every moment they are conspiring against us and we are deeply involved on it how to counter it.

@ India is definitely hostile to us and always undermining us.

@ Well we donnot have US problem like you are facing. Really it is a great problem which some how Pakistan have survived.

@ Although Bangladesh is not a multi-ethnic country but yet our population is completely demarcated as pro-Indian and anti-Indian. Some have named it as pro-liberation and anti-liberation which is infact not correct.

@ We do feel for the Pakistani peoples and hope so in future it is they who will come to rescue us in times of crisis although some feel bitter relation. Remember one thing, once we had a "Lagan" with you people and this "Lagan" may be any time in future for the greater interest. Indians may not like it but it will be, it has to be.
 
All I can about Zaid Hamid that he is a GREAT person for me.

Why. . . . . . . . . . . ?

Because he is man who is much much aware by Indians reality than any one.
 
Here is the story according to Wikipedia, regarding what led to the war.

East Pakistani grievances

Economic disparities

Although East Pakistan had a larger population, West Pakistan dominated the divided country politically and received more money from the common budget.

Year Spending on West Pakistan (in millions of Pakistani rupees) Spending on East Pakistan (in millions of Pakistani rupees)

Amount spent on East as percentage of West

1950–55 11,290 5,240 46.4
1955–60 16,550 5,240 31.7
1960–65 33,550 14,040 41.8
1965–70 51,950 21,410 41.2
Total 113,340 45,930 40.5

Political differences

Although East Pakistan accounted for a slight majority of the country's population,[16] political power remained firmly in the hands of West Pakistanis. Since a straightforward system of representation based on population would have concentrated political power in East Pakistan, the West Pakistani establishment came up with the "One Unit" scheme, where all of West Pakistan was considered one province. This was solely to counterbalance the East wing's votes.

After the assassination of Liaquat Ali Khan, Pakistan's first prime minister, in 1951, political power began to be devolved to the President of Pakistan, and eventually, the military. The nominal elected chief executive, the Prime Minister, was frequently sacked by the establishment, acting through the President.

East Pakistanis noticed that whenever one of them, such as Khawaja Nazimuddin, Muhammad Ali Bogra, or Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy was elected Prime Minister of Pakistan, he were swiftly deposed by the largely West Pakistani establishment. The military dictatorships of Ayub Khan (27 October 1958 – 25 March 1969) and Yahya Khan (25 March 1969 – 20 December 1971), both West Pakistanis, only heightened such feelings.

The situation reached a climax when in 1970 the Awami League, the largest East Pakistani political party, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, won a landslide victory in the national elections. The party won 167 of the 169 seats allotted to East Pakistan, and thus a majority of the 313 seats in the National Assembly. This gave the Awami League the constitutional right to form a government.

However, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (a Sindhi and former professor), the leader of the Pakistan Peoples Party, refused to allow Rahman to become the Prime Minister of Pakistan.[17] Instead, he proposed the idea of having two Prime Ministers, one for each wing. The proposal elicited outrage in the east wing, already chafing under the other constitutional innovation, the "one unit scheme". Bhutto also refused to accept Rahman's Six Points. On 3 March 1971, the two leaders of the two wings along with the President General Yahya Khan met in Dhaka to decide the fate of the country. Talks failed and Sheikh Mujibur Rahman called for a nationwide strike. Bhutto feared a civil war, therefore, he sent his most trusted companion, dr. Mubashir Hassan.[17] A message was convened and Mujib decided to meet Bhutto.[17] Upon his arrival, Mujib met with Bhutto and both agreed to form a coalition government with Mujib as Premier and Bhutto as President.[17] However, these developments were unaware to military, and Bhutto increased his pressure on Mujib to reached a decision.[17]

On 7 March 1971, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (soon to be the prime minister) delivered a speech at the Racecourse Ground (now called the Suhrawardy Udyan). In this speech he mentioned a further four-point condition to consider the National Assembly Meeting on 25 March:

The immediate lifting of martial law.

Immediate withdrawal of all military personnel to their barracks.

An inquiry into the loss of life.

Immediate transfer of power to the elected representative of the people before the assembly meeting 25 March.

He urged "his people" to turn every house into a fort of resistance. He closed his speech saying, "Our struggle is for our freedom.

Our struggle is for our independence." This speech is considered the main event that inspired the nation to fight for its independence. General Tikka Khan was flown in to Dhaka to become Governor of East Bengal. East-Pakistani judges, including Justice Siddique, refused to swear him in.

Between 10 and 13 March, Pakistan International Airlines cancelled all their international routes to urgently fly "Government Passengers" to Dhaka. These "Government Passengers" were almost all Pakistani soldiers in civilian dress. MV Swat, a ship of the Pakistan Navy, carrying ammunition and soldiers, was harboured in Chittagong Port and the Bengali workers and sailors at the port refused to unload the ship. A unit of East Pakistan Rifles refused to obey commands to fire on Bengali demonstrators, beginning a mutiny of Bengali soldiers.

Military imbalance

Bengalis were underrepresented in the Pakistan military. Officers of Bengali origin in the different wings of the armed forces made up just 5% of overall force by 1965; of these, only a few were in command positions, with the majority in technical or administrative posts.[18] West Pakistanis believed that Bengalis were not "martially inclined" unlike Pashtuns and Punjabis; the "martial races" notion was dismissed as ridiculous and humiliating by Bengalis.[18] Moreover, despite huge defence spending, East Pakistan received none of the benefits, such as contracts, purchasing and military support jobs. The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 over Kashmir also highlighted the sense of military insecurity among Bengalis as only an under-strength infantry division and 15 combat aircraft without tank support were in East Pakistan to thwart any Indian retaliations during the conflict.[19][20]

Language controversy

Main article: Bengali Language Movement
In 1948, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Pakistan's first Governor-General, declared in Dhaka (then usually spelled Dacca in English) that "Urdu, and only Urdu" would be the common language for all of Pakistan.[21] This proved highly controversial, since Urdu was a language that was only spoken in the West by Muhajirs and in the East by Biharis, although the Urdu language had been promoted as the lingua franca of Indian Muslims by political and religious leaders such as Sir Khwaja Salimullah, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, Nawab Viqar-ul-Mulk and Maulvi Abdul Haq. The language was considered a vital element of the Islamic culture for Indian Muslims; Hindi and the Devanagari script were seen as fundamentals of Hindu culture. The majority groups in West Pakistan spoke Punjabi, while the Bengali language was spoken by the vast majority of East Pakistanis.[22] The language controversy eventually reached a point where East Pakistan revolted while the other part of Pakistan remained calm even though Punjabi was spoken by the majority groups of West Pakistan. Several students and civilians lost their lives in a police crackdown on 21 February 1952.[22] The day is revered in Bangladesh and in West Bengal as the Language Martyrs' Day. Later, in memory of the 1952 killings, UNESCO declared 21 February as the International Mother Language Day in 1999.[23]
In West Pakistan, the movement was seen as a sectional uprising against Pakistani national interests[24] and the founding ideology of Pakistan, the Two-Nation Theory.[25] West Pakistani politicians considered Urdu a product of Indian Islamic culture,[26] as Ayub Khan said, as late as 1967, "East Bengalis... still are under considerable Hindu culture and influence."[26] But, the deaths led to bitter feelings among East Pakistanis, and they were a major factor in the push for independence.[25][26]
Response to the 1970 cyclone
The 1970 Bhola cyclone made landfall on the East Pakistan coastline during the evening of 12 November, around the same time as a local high tide,[27] killing an estimated 300,000 to 500,000 people. Though the exact death toll is not known, it is considered the deadliest tropical cyclone on record.[28] A week after the landfall, President Khan conceded that his government had made "slips" and "mistakes" in its handling of the relief efforts due to a lack of understanding of the magnitude of the disaster.[29]
A statement released by eleven political leaders in East Pakistan ten days after the cyclone hit charged the government with "gross neglect, callous and utter indifference". They also accused the president of playing down the magnitude of the problem in news coverage.[30] On 19 November, students held a march in Dhaka protesting the slowness of the government response.[31] Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani addressed a rally of 50,000 people on 24 November, where he accused the president of inefficiency and demanded his resignation.
As the conflict between East and West Pakistan developed in March, the Dhaka offices of the two government organisations directly involved in relief efforts were closed for at least two weeks, first by a general strike and then by a ban on government work in East Pakistan by the Awami League. With this increase in tension, foreign personnel were evacuated over fears of violence. Relief work continued in the field, but long-term planning was curtailed.[32] This conflict widened into the Bangladesh Liberation War in December and concluded with the creation of Bangladesh. This is one of the first times that a natural event helped to trigger a civil war.[33]

Operation Searchlight

Main articles: Operation Searchlight and Evolution of Pakistan Eastern Command plan#Evolution of the Pakistan High Command plan in 1971
A planned military pacification carried out by the Pakistan Army – codenamed Operation Searchlight – started on 25 March to curb the Bengali nationalist movement[34] by taking control of the major cities on 26 March, and then eliminating all opposition, political or military,[35] within one month. Before the beginning of the operation, all foreign journalists were systematically deported from East Pakistan.[36]
The main phase of Operation Searchlight ended with the fall of the last major town in Bengali hands in mid-May. The operation also began the 1971 Bangladesh atrocities. These systematic killings served only to enrage the Bengalis, which ultimately resulted in the secession of East Pakistan later in the same year. The international media and reference books in English have published casualty figures which vary greatly, from 5,000–35,000 in Dhaka, and 200,000–3,000,000 for Bangladesh as a whole,[8] and the atrocities have been referred to as acts of genocide.[37][38]
According to the Asia Times,[39]
At a meeting of the military top brass, Yahya Khan declared: "Kill 3 million of them and the rest will eat out of our hands." Accordingly, on the night of 25 March, the Pakistani Army launched Operation Searchlight to "crush" Bengali resistance in which Bengali members of military services were disarmed and killed, students and the intelligentsia systematically liquidated and able-bodied Bengali males just picked up and gunned down.
Although the violence focused on the provincial capital, Dhaka, it also affected all parts of East Pakistan. Residential halls of the University of Dhaka were particularly targeted. The only Hindu residential hall – the Jagannath Hall – was destroyed by the Pakistani armed forces, and an estimated 600 to 700 of its residents were murdered. The Pakistani army denies any cold blooded killings at the university, though the Hamood-ur-Rehman commission in Pakistan concluded that overwhelming force was used at the university. This fact and the massacre at Jagannath Hall and nearby student dormitories of Dhaka University are corroborated by a videotape secretly filmed by Prof. Nurul Ullah of the East Pakistan Engineering University, whose residence was directly opposite the student dormitories.[40]
Hindu areas suffered particularly heavy blows. By midnight, Dhaka was burning,[citation needed] especially the Hindu dominated eastern part of the city. Time magazine reported on 2 August 1971, "The Hindus, who account for three-fourths of the refugees and a majority of the dead, have borne the brunt of the Pakistani military hatred."
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was arrested by the Pakistani Army. Yahya Khan appointed Brigadier (later General) Rahimuddin Khan to preside over a special tribunal prosecuting Mujib with multiple charges. The tribunal's sentence was never made public, but Yahya caused the verdict to be held in abeyance in any case.[citation needed] Other Awami League leaders were arrested as well, while a few fled Dhaka to avoid arrest. The Awami League was banned by General Yahya Khan.[41]
Declaration of independence
The violence unleashed by the Pakistani forces on 25 March 1971, proved the last straw to the efforts to negotiate a settlement. Following these outrages, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman signed an official declaration that read:
Today Bangladesh is a sovereign and independent country. On Thursday night, West Pakistani armed forces suddenly attacked the police barracks at Razarbagh and the EPR headquarters at Pilkhana in Dhaka. Many innocent and unarmed have been killed in Dhaka city and other places of Bangladesh. Violent clashes between E.P.R. and Police on the one hand and the armed forces of Pakistan on the other, are going on. The Bengalis are fighting the enemy with great courage for an independent Bangladesh. May Allah aid us in our fight for freedom. Joy Bangla.[42][43]
Sheikh Mujib also called upon the people to resist the occupation forces through a radio message.[44] Mujib was arrested on the night of 25–26 March 1971 at about 1:30 am (as per Radio Pakistan's news on 29 March 1971).
A telegram containing the text of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's declaration reached some students in Chittagong. The message was translated to Bangla by Dr. Manjula Anwar. The students failed to secure permission from higher authorities to broadcast the message from the nearby Agrabad Station of Radio Pakistan. They crossed Kalurghat Bridge into an area controlled by an East Bengal Regiment under Major Ziaur Rahman. Bengali soldiers guarded the station as engineers prepared for transmission. At 19:45 hrs on 27 March 1971, Major Ziaur Rahman broadcast the announcement of the declaration of independence on behalf of Sheikh Mujibur. On 28 March Major Ziaur Rahman made another announcement, which was as follows:
This is Shadhin Bangla Betar Kendro. I, Major Ziaur Rahman, at the direction of Bangobondhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, hereby declare that the independent People's Republic of Bangladesh has been established. At his direction, I have taken command as the temporary Head of the Republic. In the name of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, I call upon all Bengalis to rise against the attack by the West Pakistani Army. We shall fight to the last to free our Motherland. By the grace of Allah, victory is ours. Joy Bangla. Audio of Zia's announcement (interview – Belal Mohammed)
The Kalurghat Radio Station's transmission capability was limited. The message was picked up by a Japanese ship in Bay of Bengal. It was then re-transmitted by Radio Australia and later by the British Broadcasting Corporation.
M A Hannan, an Awami League leader from Chittagong, is said to have made the first announcement of the declaration of independence over the radio on 26 March 1971.[45] There is controversy now as to when Major Zia gave his speech. BNP sources maintain that it was 26 March, and there was no message regarding declaration of independence from Mujibur Rahman. Pakistani sources, like Siddiq Salik in Witness to Surrender had written that he heard about Mujibor Rahman's message on the Radio while Operation Searchlight was going on, and Maj. Gen. Hakeem A. Qureshi in his book The 1971 Indo-Pak War: A Soldier's Narrative, gives the date of Zia's speech as 27 March 1971.[46]
26 March 1971 is considered the official Independence Day of Bangladesh, and the name Bangladesh was in effect henceforth. In July 1971, Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi openly referred to the former East Pakistan as Bangladesh.[47] Some Pakistani and Indian officials continued to use the name "East Pakistan" until 16 December 1971.

It might take you some time to read through it but it is worth it if you want to know what really went wrong and who is to be blamed for this. However, if someone says me that they dont trust information from Wikipedia and rather trust information from Zaid Hamid kind of people, then i have nothing to say... except that you guys can listen to whomever you want and live in your wishful dream world.
 
Here is the story according to Wikipedia, regarding what led to the war.



It might take you some time to read through it but it is worth it if you want to know what really went wrong and who is to be blamed for this. However, if someone says me that they dont trust information from Wikipedia and rather trust information from Zaid Hamid kind of people, then i have nothing to say... except that you guys can listen to whomever you want and live in your wishful dream world.

I do believe disparities was not cause behind this split. Bangalis tried to solve it politically. Yes there were separatists like Moulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani and Tajuddin Ahmed, But Majority of Bangladeshis didn't think about separation before 25th march. Operation searchlight is the event after which a war was inevitable and it is the main cause of separation. Operation Searchlight was a disaster for Pakistan. Whoever planned this, is super idiot.............
 
I do believe disparities was not cause behind this split. Bangalis tried to solve it politically. Yes there were separatists like Moulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani and Tajuddin Ahmed, But Majority of Bangladeshis didn't think about separation before 25th march. Operation searchlight is the event after which a war was inevitable and it is the main cause of separation. Operation Searchlight was a disaster for Pakistan. Whoever planned this, is super idiot.............

It is true that economic disparity could not have created the war but it was surely one of the reasons why this war happened.

Sheikh Mujib did not make the point of independence before Operation Searchlight in 25th March, infact supporters of BNP will tell you Ziaur Rahman was the one who declared independence and that gave Sheikh Mujib the courage to go for all our independence war. If the Pakistani government did not answer with brutal force, there would be no war. Thus we can conclude that the Pakistani rulers were the instigators of the war, and not vice versa.

I can understand that Pakistani people will have problems with accepting that their rulers were at fault here, but pretty much the same thing is happening in Balochistan. People are aggrieved by economic disparities, and then the issue becomes more serious, and some people want independence, and then the government of Pakistan replies with brutal force instead of solving the problem.
 
There were many factor behind separation , military , social , political , economical ..

It was nearly impossible for military to defend area in which enemy has support in people plus no land link , instead of launching protest against inequalities if any they chooses separation path , it was better for Pakistan to pullback army before war it was waste of resource.

Gone for good , now they are at their own , :tup:

We consider Muslim Brotherhood that's enough.
 
It is true that economic disparity could not have created the war but it was surely one of the reasons why this war happened.

Sheikh Mujib did not make the point of independence before Operation Searchlight in 25th March, infact supporters of BNP will tell you Ziaur Rahman was the one who declared independence and that gave Sheikh Mujib the courage to go for all our independence war. If the Pakistani government did not answer with brutal force, there would be no war. Thus we can conclude that the Pakistani rulers were the instigators of the war, and not vice versa.

I can understand that Pakistani people will have problems with accepting that their rulers were at fault here, but pretty much the same thing is happening in Balochistan. People are aggrieved by economic disparities, and then the issue becomes more serious, and some people want independence, and then the government of Pakistan replies with brutal force instead of solving the problem.

Please don't talk about Pakistan's minority groups, I belong to a minority group, & we never gave our ethnic identity priority over our national one like you did. Pew Global showed 90% of all Pakistanis consider themselves Pakistanis first & their ethnic group second. No one in Pakistan insisted their regional language to be the national language. Urdu is our national language & we are proud of it, of speaking it. The WOT is taking place in FATA, & it is one of the most underdeveloped regions in the country, but there is not one separatist movement coming out from there, or KPK; even though there are a lot of Pashtuns getting killed. In Balochistan, most Baloch people (& even Baloch nationalists) want to work within the framework of the constitution, & within the law to get their legal rights. Almost every Pakistani ethnic group has had grievances against the state (include Punjabis, South Punjab being one of the most poor areas in the country) since 1947, faced more injustices than you did prior to 1971, but we worked within our legal rights to empower ourselves. We didn't demand separation from Pakistan. Pakistan is a young country even now, only 64 years old. It is growing everyday. Even the US had a civil war in Gettysburg, PA in 1865 when the South wanted to separate from the North. There was slavery in the US as well. And we have reached a long way. I am glad 1971 happened. We have learned how to defend ourselves, we have become a military power, the 27th largest economy in the world, & our country is no danger of splitting up, or being taken over. Despite the WOT, our GDP growth rate has increased steadily, & the size of our economy grows as well. We have stood up to every challenge thrown at us. We have stood up to a nation 7 times our size involved in proxy wars against us on one side, & a failed state on our Western front, where the WOT is taking place, where the Soviet war took place. Unlike Pakistan, you live in a peaceful region.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom