Doesn't work like that. You have to be able to look at the context of each.
To fight the Soviets occupation (good reason).
The question was "who gave them the training"....not "why they where given training".
At least answer the question!
To get rid of NS who had taken the country to default (good reason) .
"Doesn't work like that. You have to be able to look at the context of each."
10 years of military/economic sanctions/penalties/restrictions on the civilian govt and then the nuclear test took the country to the economic situation to it what was under NS.
To get rid of Al Qaeda and stabilize Pakistan (good reason) .
So you think the tribesman are members of Al Qaeda?.....only a handful of people must think pakistan is more stable now then what it was under the previous leadership.
YES......
To get rid of kidnappers and murderers in the name of Islam and stabilize Pakistan (good reason) .
lol
Dude, learn some economics. Privatization increases corruption, fdi will decrease it. It's obvious why Bhutto and NS wanted to privatize. This is one of the worst arguments/reasons you've come out with (and you've made some pretty bad ones). So there is a good reason to increase FDI. .
Are you sure its me that has to learn economics or you?
This noone agrees with, but on the one hand you want NS allowed in (one corrupt man) on the other you want BB to be prosecuted. Every argument needs consistence, of which you have none. The reason for dropping corruption charges against BB, was so that Musharraf could form a majority with a party other than the MMA. The MMA is a backward, idiot filled party who have managed to put the NWFP back 5 years with their moronic laws. The best interests of Pakistan lie in a Musharraf led, Bhutto-leashed (so she is accountable to Musharraf), government. I support this coalition. So I guess the corruption charges must be dropped (good reason again)..
What are you talking about?
Let BB and NS into the country....when did i say dont press charges against NS?
Is that you jumping to your own conclusions again.
"Every argument needs consistence, of which you have none"
So i guess the MMA where also a "backward, idiot filled party" when they where supporting mushy.
Pakistan ISI does not randomly select people and hand them to foreign countries. This must be another one of those things your "friends" in the army/ISI told you sitting in your armchair at home. (false argument)..
Have started dreaming again?
I have had friends that have fought for the taliban and family members that have been fighting in kashmir.
I have been to the NWFP and afghanistan.
I have been "on the ground" unlike yourself.
Armchair academics ,and i use the word "academic" in the most liberal sense like yourself have seen the taliban/mujahdeen on tv or read something on website somewhere about them and you think your experts.....go meet some and then talk about them.
It reminds me of the top HAMAS expert in the USA has never met a HAMAS member......sounds very familiar.
Now can you go through the list provided for you, and give the same reasons for the extremist's actions? I doubt it. There's a reason for everything. ALL of Musharraf's actions have been for the best interests of Pakistan. Go through AM's list or my list, and tell me how those actions have been in the best interests of Pakistan (for example trying to blow up hotels where foreigners visit).
Practice what you preach.