Saif al-Arab
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2015
- Messages
- 8,873
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Next page.
Ignorant clown detected. A region that is home to 21 World UNESCO Heritage Sites, home to some of the oldest recorded civilizations, some of the longest continuously inhabited cities and which is the second oldest inhabited spot on the planet after East Africa. You are completely right genius!
Try harder cretin.
PDF at its best.
LOL. Only a few GCC states (all tiny states (population wise) such as Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE etc. - all former British colonies) used the currency. No other Arab nations, KSA included. Wait, Aden used it too for a while as did Oman.
The region used countless of much older indigenous currencies (some of the oldest in the world) before the Brits arrived.
The Arab world is composed of 20 + countries and home to almost 500 million people.
The native populations of Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE combined do not even exceed the population of Riyadh.
The ignorance on this forum.
Some people are mentally ill.
I want to see him actually provide proof for his lies. Of course he can't. Not to say that most Arabs know very little about Pakistan and it is hardly discussed. Let alone mocked or whatever nonsense he wrote.
As for looted? What did we loot exactly? Rice and mango?
Exactly.
Correct.
Lastly let us get something right here. What was considered India before 1947 (Arabia and "India" trading ties) was basically what is today Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Nepal etc.
The trading and cultural ties (as a consequence of that trade) are indeed several millennia old (some 5000 years) but are mostly confined to what is today Sindh (IVC), Western India, Kerala, Sri Lanka (Sri Lankan Moors being the legacy) and a few other areas as far as I recall.
I doubt that Myanmar, Nepal, Bangladesh or Calcutta were included.
No Arab country has any disputes with India or any historical animosity. To begin with mostly only GCC and Iraq have historical ties to South Asia of all Arab states. In terms of trade it is mostly the GCC leading the way as well.
We will continue to trade with India, a country that cannot be ignored but that does not mean that we cannot have cordial ties with Pakistan. Pakistani-Indian disputes are not our matter just like the current Arab-Iranian disputes are
not an Indian or Pakistani matter.
Arabs have traded with the entire world for millennia. Business is business.
Simple as that.
Anyway I welcome closer GCC-India economic ties if that will be mutually beneficially. Anything else would be idiotic. Even Pakistan and India do trade with each other and that will increase in the future so why should we ignore India when nobody else does it? Are we not in our rights to do trade with economic partners like any other states and peoples? We don't demand Pakistan not to do trade with Iran for instance.
Also as for languages, Arabic was widely spoken by traders in South Asia as well and the ruling dynasties and upper classes, especially the Muslim ones. From the Nizam of Hyderabad (who claimed ancestry from Caliph Umar (ra) ) to former ruling dynasties in what is today Pakistan.
You unfortunately have ignorant people everywhere. That is a given. In general most people don't know much about history and for most it is of no importance.
I am fine bro. All well. More than well actually. Good to see you back. I hope that everything is good and well.
Indeed. Time flies by fast. Too fast. Sometimes you don't even realize it yourself. So we should do what we want to do whenever we have the opportunity and not wait for a second chance. Such a chance might not arrive.
Ignorant clown detected. A region that is home to 21 World UNESCO Heritage Sites, home to some of the oldest recorded civilizations, some of the longest continuously inhabited cities and which is the second oldest inhabited spot on the planet after East Africa. You are completely right genius!
Try harder cretin.
PDF at its best.
LOL. Only a few GCC states (all tiny states (population wise) such as Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE etc. - all former British colonies) used the currency. No other Arab nations, KSA included. Wait, Aden used it too for a while as did Oman.
The region used countless of much older indigenous currencies (some of the oldest in the world) before the Brits arrived.
The Arab world is composed of 20 + countries and home to almost 500 million people.
The native populations of Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, UAE combined do not even exceed the population of Riyadh.
The ignorance on this forum.
Some people are mentally ill.
I want to see him actually provide proof for his lies. Of course he can't. Not to say that most Arabs know very little about Pakistan and it is hardly discussed. Let alone mocked or whatever nonsense he wrote.
As for looted? What did we loot exactly? Rice and mango?
Exactly.
Correct.
Lastly let us get something right here. What was considered India before 1947 (Arabia and "India" trading ties) was basically what is today Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Nepal etc.
The trading and cultural ties (as a consequence of that trade) are indeed several millennia old (some 5000 years) but are mostly confined to what is today Sindh (IVC), Western India, Kerala, Sri Lanka (Sri Lankan Moors being the legacy) and a few other areas as far as I recall.
I doubt that Myanmar, Nepal, Bangladesh or Calcutta were included.
No Arab country has any disputes with India or any historical animosity. To begin with mostly only GCC and Iraq have historical ties to South Asia of all Arab states. In terms of trade it is mostly the GCC leading the way as well.
We will continue to trade with India, a country that cannot be ignored but that does not mean that we cannot have cordial ties with Pakistan. Pakistani-Indian disputes are not our matter just like the current Arab-Iranian disputes are
not an Indian or Pakistani matter.
Arabs have traded with the entire world for millennia. Business is business.
Simple as that.
Anyway I welcome closer GCC-India economic ties if that will be mutually beneficially. Anything else would be idiotic. Even Pakistan and India do trade with each other and that will increase in the future so why should we ignore India when nobody else does it? Are we not in our rights to do trade with economic partners like any other states and peoples? We don't demand Pakistan not to do trade with Iran for instance.
Also as for languages, Arabic was widely spoken by traders in South Asia as well and the ruling dynasties and upper classes, especially the Muslim ones. From the Nizam of Hyderabad (who claimed ancestry from Caliph Umar (ra) ) to former ruling dynasties in what is today Pakistan.
You unfortunately have ignorant people everywhere. That is a given. In general most people don't know much about history and for most it is of no importance.
I am fine bro. All well. More than well actually. Good to see you back. I hope that everything is good and well.
Indeed. Time flies by fast. Too fast. Sometimes you don't even realize it yourself. So we should do what we want to do whenever we have the opportunity and not wait for a second chance. Such a chance might not arrive.
