What's new

U.S. unlikely to back down on Taiwan issue

His post seems to have been deleted, but it looks like a classic case of a Pakistani immigrant that can't fit in (bitterness). I don't know what it is, but they have a super hard time fitting in with the Europeans here. I guess it's Islam, but then again, even their liberals don't fit in.

As for his comments, just lol. The people that built this country should be noted in history as the most hardworking human beings that ever existed. They came from much different climates to a land of snow and ice full of permafrost and evergreens. Their seeds produced no crops here and their knowledge of farming was useless. Within mere centuries they created a great nation out of snow and ice. He's bitter and his words aren't what he actually believes in.

There was a Pakistani girl who was making out with her white boyfriend in the University library where I was trying to study a few days ago. Some of them fit in quite nicely :lol:
 
And you have millions living like street trash. Stinking and spreading fleas.
And China does not ?

China is a developing country. No one ignores the fact that it went through hardships, including civil wars and occupation in its recent history. It is amazing hunger and homelessness has to happen one of the most developed nations on earth. (Not that we would seek pleasure over others' misery.)
Then focus on your own China. You want to discuss foreign and military affairs in an objective manner ? Am all ears. Unfortunately, we all know that not one of you ever served in the military and nothing to contribute on a military oriented forum so we have to suffer your insults on our persons and our countries.

I indeed took many PoliSci classes.
I doubt that. What you posted was nothing but a confirmation of what I said about the 'first past the post' electoral process. If anything, I doubt that you even understood a paragraph of it. The FPTP electoral process is the most basic and many ways, most objective of all electoral process. Majority vote count. Simple as that. At least it is better than the single party authoritarian system you got in China. What a laugh you are: a Chinese supporting a single party system is offended by America's two party system.
 
Substandard article. What exactly did the US resist the pressure to 'back down' from? This is the boast made in the headline, so it's not a question that can be brushed away. Unless the writers are so desperate that they're trying to present preserving the status-quo as some grand triumph? :rofl:
 
And China does not ?


Then focus on your own China. You want to discuss foreign and military affairs in an objective manner ? Am all ears. Unfortunately, we all know that not one of you ever served in the military and nothing to contribute on a military oriented forum so we have to suffer your insults on our persons and our countries.
Honestly, you cannot expect everyone to have served in the military in order to participate and debate in this military forum. That is discriminating against intellectual civilians outside the military.
 
Honestly, you cannot expect everyone to have served in the military in order to participate and debate in this military forum. That is discriminating against intellectual civilians outside the military.
I said 'in an objective' manner. I have no problems with non-military people discussing military affairs, but it is fair to expect that they acknowledge their deficiencies and concede any point, especially when it comes to technical issues, when necessary. I have found your Chinese members to be the worst offenders on this forum about that.
 
There was a Pakistani girl who was making out with her white boyfriend in the University library where I was trying to study a few days ago. Some of them fit in quite nicely :lol:
She's a girl, it doesn't count :lol:

Men are a different story lol
 
She's a girl, it doesn't count :lol:

Men are a different story lol

Yea I know what you mean. Some of the South Asians wear traditional clothes. They stick out like a sore thumb. I can't tell if they are Indians or Pakis. Man, there are soo many south asians in Canada. They are everywhere, even in Edmonton especially the south.
 
And China does not ?

That's the issue here. We do not care about your social ills. You are obsessed with those exist in our society. That's the sickness of your substandard culture.


Then focus on your own China. You want to discuss foreign and military affairs in an objective manner ? Am all ears. Unfortunately, we all know that not one of you ever served in the military and nothing to contribute on a military oriented forum so we have to suffer your insults on our persons and our countries.

Then stop focusing on our own China. If you are obsessed with ours, we become obsessed with yours. Brawl continues forever.

You are not objective from many others' perspective. Stop self-serving. Let your opponent tell you whether you are objective or not.

I doubt that. What you posted was nothing but a confirmation of what I said about the 'first past the post' electoral process. If anything, I doubt that you even understood a paragraph of it. The FPTP electoral process is the most basic and many ways, most objective of all electoral process. Majority vote count. Simple as that. At least it is better than the single party authoritarian system you got in China. What a laugh you are: a Chinese supporting a single party system is offended by America's two party system.

You are free to doubt. You doubt others at least as much as you do not doubt yourself. But we do not take your overrated self-perpetuation as a sign of greatness.

What I posted shows clearly the inherent/built-in checks on the emergence and survival of a third party in the present US regime, which is undemocratic. The two parties have overtime built a mechanism to protect their iron grip on the people's choice. Given that the two parties are basically funded by the wealthy, it is indirect-fascism, at best.

That you hold a circus every four year does not make your system a good one, neither does it make it superior to ours or others'. Elections-shows are for entertainment; which Founding Fathers might not have envisioned when they crafted an elitist indirect representation.

If the system is rigged and compromised, then it has no value.

I do not consider FPP as reflective of common good especially if the system has turned rigid and corrupted with money. Which is the case with the US.

And "at least it is better than..." statement can be discussed from various angles. If the purpose is putting up a show and a circus every some odd years, then yes, it is, at least. If the purpose is good governance, then, the rigidity and corruption inherent in the model requires a serious overhaul of the system.
 
Yeah, so don't assumed we are not going to intervene if China attacks Japan or the Philippines, etc.
Interesting !

Maybe Japan or Phi will not be happy to hear that !

USA promise them so much!:woot:
 
Iran economy is in ruins thanks to the Western sanctions, same is the fate of Russian's economy if Russia doesn't stop interfering in Ukraine.
Iran would have been among top ten world economies by 2020 with average annual growth of 7pct in early 2000s. Since sanctions kicked in, its economy shrank by nearly half, inflation skyrocketed and its intellectual elite started migrating in tens of thousands.
Be realistic. U.S. is a superpower (and it will maintain the status quo for years to come) and anyone denying it is either ignorant or doesn't want to admit to it.

He meant bitch slap = military action and annihilation thus my response is lets try it upon russians, NK and iran before thinking of Chinese as simple as it is he has no Answers to it because that was a stupid common on his part you know feeling good.
 
His post seems to have been deleted, but it looks like a classic case of a Pakistani immigrant that can't fit in (bitterness). I don't know what it is, but they have a super hard time fitting in with the Europeans here. I guess it's Islam, but then again, even their liberals don't fit in.

Hi, did you fit in well I guess not you are still confused identity? I know most iranian migrants came to CA under the pretext of mullah regimes and got asylum so please don't compare others who have real cash to have invested in. My discussion with said member was with-in context if you understand context you would get it why I brought in europe. Nobody has super hardtime it is your imagination, now you don't bring in religion I know what is you motive but I would advise you to stick to thread topic...have a healthy discussion good luck and no we won't be discussing anything else since you are derailing thread...

Yea I know what you mean. Some of the South Asians wear traditional clothes. They stick out like a sore thumb. I can't tell if they are Indians or Pakis. Man, there are soo many south asians in Canada. They are everywhere, even in Edmonton especially the south.

You shouldn't have problem with people wearing traditional clothes unless you are racist but yes the follow up comment proves you are racist. Just like there are so many latin and brazilians and mexicans in US illegal and some legal the situation is horrible down there.

Stick to topic will you.
 
Last edited:
China is surrounded even by their own Chinese in TW . Chinese now have to stay in a land with full of terrorism killing people day by day.

Enemy, terrorist is everywhere in China, even Malaysia pilots r not their friends ,too. What a night mare for Chinese now.
 
That's the issue here. We do not care about your social ills. You are obsessed with those exist in our society. That's the sickness of your substandard culture.

Then stop focusing on our own China. If you are obsessed with ours, we become obsessed with yours. Brawl continues forever.
Of course you do. Look at your fellow Chinese members here for fine examples. I focus on Chinese political and military issues as how they relate to foreign powers. But since you guys prefers to zero in on US social issues, we can use China for comparison.

What I posted shows clearly the inherent/built-in checks on the emergence and survival of a third party in the present US regime, which is undemocratic. The two parties have overtime built a mechanism to protect their iron grip on the people's choice.
How is it 'undemocratic' if there is no law to prevent the existence, let alone the rise, of other parties ?

Did you know that there is a communist party in the US => Home » cpusa . :lol:

So if we can tolerate the commies, we can certainly tolerate the Libertarians, the Socialists, and anyone else. We have a Socialist Congressman, Senator Bernie Sanders. Does China have any alternative political ideology in the Chinese legislature ? Does China even ALLOW competing political parties ? :lol:

Given that the two parties are basically funded by the wealthy, it is indirect-fascism, at best.
Bullshit. You got no hard data to back that up. Any American can donate to any party he want, including the CPUSA. It is the burden of the political party to convince the people to fund its existence.

That you hold a circus every four year does not make your system a good one, neither does it make it superior to ours or others'.
Of course our circus is better than yours. At least we present the people with candidates.

Elections-shows are for entertainment; which Founding Fathers might not have envisioned when they crafted an elitist indirect representation.
Again...Unless you know why the US Electoral College was created in the first place, do not presume you know what the American Founding Fathers would think of today's elections.

News for you, kid...

If China was designed to be a democratic republic like the US was, her Founding Fathers would most likely insert a Chinese version of the US Electoral College.

See if you can figure out why.

If the system is rigged and compromised, then it has no value.
A lot more honest than your China.

90% Of China’s Super-Rich Want To Send Children Abroad
Western media have reported that Xi Mingze, the daughter of Xi Jinping, who is widely expected to become the new president of China and chairman of its Communist Party, is studying at Harvard University under an assumed name. (The university hasn't confirmed to the International Business Times that she indeed studies there.)
You want to see a rigged system ? Go look out the window at your China. What have little miss Jinping accomplished to earn even a speculation that she is going to inherit the Dragon Throne ? So what if the Western media is wrong ? The reason why they speculate is because your system is so rigged that such assumptions became common place throughout modern China.

Face it. You are living in a modern dynastic China.

I do not consider FPP as reflective of common good especially if the system has turned rigid and corrupted with money. Which is the case with the US.

And "at least it is better than..." statement can be discussed from various angles. If the purpose is putting up a show and a circus every some odd years, then yes, it is, at least. If the purpose is good governance, then, the rigidity and corruption inherent in the model requires a serious overhaul of the system.
It is FPTP. Like it or not, it is better with money than with bullets, of which your China is still using to control politics. So yes, our system is far superior to yours, sheeple.
 
Last edited:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom