U.S request Pakistan to Close PAK - IRAN border

[Arsalan 345]

we do not have much of an air force so BM is our first option. yes im sorry to say that but we have better air defence system then PK i always said PK must buy some Iranian systems but no one agrees with me.

i agree with you.i told them years ago lol. protect yourself and stay away from such regions.there is no need to sacrifice your life.if they attack iran,go to the border and fight for your land but for iraq,stay away.iraq is a mess.i understand your emotions but kindly think about your life.better protect iran.leave iraq on proxies.i think proxies can handle america wisely.

 

[Crusher]

well here is the defining moment for Pakistan and Time to start acting like a state. this is not 2001 just as a reminder.

Iran-Pakistan border is nothing but a heaven for smugglers of oil and people since last many many decades.

Look in this video for yourself

 

[masterchief_mirza]

there are many scenarios.if you imagine the results of all scenarios,you will find out that pakistan will be affected.there is no escape for pakistan.open border,close border,allow irani regime to cross border,not allow them,allow usa to setup bases in pak,not allow usa to setup bases in pak,western border,eastern border,iran pak border,strait of hormuz and arabian ocean,explosions in iran,us navy fleet in arabian ocean,irani navy in strait of hormuz,strategic and ballistic missiles,russian interference,chinese interference,arab interference,israeli interference,indian ibgs inside pakistan,large scale indian attack.all these scenarios not good for pakistan.

Here I disagree. A complete stalemate is in many ways beneficial. It will neuter American arrogance in the region, also stifling Hindustani misadventurism and causing all American regional allies to hesitate. It will show that even unassailable tech superiority is no guarantee of victory. Pakistan could certainly learn new ways to challenge Hindustan in terms of drone warfare and other asymmetric tactics. A costly war for the mullahs will naturally leave them impotent in terms of any of their own nefarious designs against Pakistan (which are worth remembering even in this time of great upheaval - the mullah regime and even soleimani openly favoured India over us).

An absolute American victory is the worst outcome for Pakistan.

A stalemate would be great, but I would settle for an Iranian victory, as impossible as that is.

Perhaps Sun Tzu said it best. Wait by the riverbank patiently and the bodies of all your enemies will eventually float past.

 

[Path-Finder]

Secular Afghanistan first. Iran has be a major hurdle in our process.


Ask for Afghanistan and then we will surely stay neutral and maybe even lean closer to the US.

1. Leave Afghanistan

2. Provide us cash to secure Afghanistan and develop it. Close to 15 billion $, should be fine.

3. Provide us weapons so secure our selves from the Persians.

4. Back us at the UN, to make the reunification of Afghanistan with Pakistan, legal.

@Hakim Dawary

f#ck the yanks they abandoned Pakistan after soviet withdrawal leaving a mess which they helped creating and nurturing. the mofo's placed sanctions on us once they got what they needed! F#ck them! Dont ask for anything I am shocked that people on forum have a wish list!

I want there to be a address from either PM or DGISPR and take the nation into confidence! The yanks have already caused us misery from afghanistan and now that they have failed they will cause us misery from Iran.

 

[pakdefender]

Iran may try to attack the US embassy in Pakistan so we may have to increase combat air patrolling which will require additional F-16s

 

[US North Won]

This is simply a heads-up to Pakistan to minimize potential civilian casualties that their citizens might be suddenly caught in a warzone if they are over in Iran. It is suggested they not travel there in case things hit-the-fan so as to avoid a mad scramble to get out of the country.

I'm going to caution you on the veracity of this thread and the claim being made. I can't find any reputable or official Pakistani press release to back up this media site's claim. Not one

 

[Arsalan 345]

Here I disagree. A complete stalemate is in many ways beneficial. It will neuter American arrogance in the region, also stifling Hindustani misadventurism and causing all American regional allies to hesitate. It will show that even unassailable tech superiority is no guarantee of victory. Pakistan could certainly learn new ways to challenge Hindustan in terms of drone warfare and other asymmetric tactics. A costly war for the mullahs will naturally leave them impotent in terms of any of their own nefarious designs against Pakistan (which are worth remembering even in this time of great upheaval - the mullah regime and even soleimani openly favoured India over us).

An absolute American victory is the worst outcome for Pakistan.

A stalemate would be great, but I would settle for an Iranian victory, as impossible as that is.

Perhaps Sun Tzu said it best. Wait by the riverbank patiently and the bodies of all your enemies will eventually float past.

i know about his statements against pakistan and kulbhushan case but overall i don't want problems with iran for two reasons.

1) we can still make our relations better and there is room for this.we can share weapons,expertise etc.

2)we can't afford hostile iran because it shares border with us.

yes i know about irani regime but not everyone in irgc supports india.he died.question is why he was targeted? obviously israel wanted him dead and you can realize what's going on here.also india is lobbying to target people in pakistan.do you know what it means? i believe you are mature enough to understand my point.we shouldn't find excuses to let his death go unnoticed.we should think about our own country and we should also think about iran and anger in iran.we know both arabs and iran are fighting this useless proxy war but why general died on irani side and nothing happened on arab side? it's clear to me that usa is supporting 3 to 4 countries and will continue to support them.i believe usa didn't harm us just because of afghanistan but after death of irani general,i seriously doubt american intentions.india is important player for usa.anyway lets hope for peace but i think it will escalate further.

 

[Crusher]

I'm going to caution you on the veracity of this thread and the claim being made. I can't find any reputable or official Pakistani press release to back up this media site's claim. Not one

Don't worry much, many of the discussions on this forum are based on some BS claims which often turn out to be false.

 

[masterchief_mirza]

i know about his statements against pakistan and kulbhushan case but overall i don't want problems with iran for two reasons.

1) we can still make our relations better and there is room for this.we can share weapons,expertise etc.

2)we can't afford hostile iran because it shares border with us.

yes i know about irani regime but not everyone in irgc supports india.he died.question is why he was targeted? obviously israel wanted him dead and you can realize what's going on here.also india is lobbying to target UN designated terrorists in pakistan.do you know what it means? i believe you are mature enough to understand my point.we shouldn't find excuses to let his death go unnoticed.we should think about our own country and we should also think about iran and anger in iran.we know both arabs and iran are fighting this useless proxy war but why general died on irani side and nothing happened on arab side? it's clear to me that usa is supporting 3 to 4 countries and will continue to support them.i believe usa didn't harm us just because of afghanistan but after death of irani general,i seriously doubt american intentions.india is important player for usa.anyway lets hope for peace but i think it will escalate further.

I agree with your overall assessment. I'm simply reminding our readers that we have no genuine horses to back in this race . As I said, the worst outcome for Pakistan is an American foothold gained in Iran. The survival of the mullahocracy is preferable to that.

 

[Arsalan 345]

I agree with your overall assessment. I'm simply reminding our readers that we have no genuine horses to back in this race . As I said, the worst outcome for Pakistan is an American foothold gained in Iran. The survival of the mullahocracy is preferable to that.

i don't want pro arab government in iran.today arabs prefer trade over old relations.i definitely want peaceful end of this hostility.

 

[Path-Finder]

and in the process would disturb the ethnic and religio-political balance of the country. We are such fools who have forget 1979 revolution and invasion of Afghanistan and effect of these events on Pakistan ....

solution is to have Turkish model on how they tackled Syrian refugees. keep them away from cities and settle them at a location close to Iran, if god forbid things came to it. Our handling of afghani refugees was a f#cking disgrace.

 

[Pakhtoon yum]

f#ck the yanks they abandoned Pakistan after soviet withdrawal leaving a mess which they helped creating and nurturing. the mofo's placed sanctions on us once they got what they needed! F#ck them! Dont ask for anything I am shocked that people on forum have a wish list!

I want there to be a address from either PM or DGISPR and take the nation into confidence! The yanks have already caused us misery from afghanistan and now that they have failed they will cause us misery from Iran.

Honestly do what's best for Pakistan and I see this as a chance to bend their arm. or else we will make statements against the US terrorism in the middle east. Which will fuel the flames

 

[AmschelHonestvig]

solution is to have Turkish model on how they tackled Syrian refugees. keep them away from cities and settle them at a location close to Iran, if god forbid things came to it. Our handling of afghani refugees was a f#cking disgrace.

safe zone is a clever idea.

 

[Verve]

I'm going to caution you on the veracity of this thread and the claim being made. I can't find any reputable or official Pakistani press release to back up this media site's claim. Not one

Interesting comment from a supposedly 21yrs old who joined the forum just yesterday.

 

[AmschelHonestvig]

Iran may try to attack the US embassy in Pakistan so we may have to increase combat air patrolling which will require additional F-16s

Yes it will require F-35s - hurray More new yankee toys equipment !

Yes it will require F-35s - hurray More new yankee toys equipment !

Should make the US prove its loyalty too - X-mas without gifts ?