Dude, seriously, when it comes to UAVs, Baykar keeps making TAI look like an amateur aviation club in comparison.
Baykar is a private company, they made Bayraktar UAV by their own decision. Remember, when Baykar made Bayraktar TB2, they couldn't sell it to the Army. SSM told them that "Our requirements are different in this project" and they declined.
Baykar made their own propaganda for 2 years to get public support behind them, then new tenders opened for TB2's class UAVs, and that is how they could sell their UAVs. After TB2's success, Army wanted to buy more TB2 from Baykar.
----------------------------------
TAI, in the other hand, was working on a project that has defined requirements within the tender. They built UAV according to tender successfully, then Army changed the requirements. That is how Anka-A was borned.
After they built Anka-B, Army changed requirements again about Cirit missiles, and within 2 years TAI successfully tested Cirit missile from Anka-B (after changing whole wing physical components)
Then Army changed requirements again about SATCOM. In 2 years, TAI built ANKA-S that can carry SATCOM. But then, MAM-L got into serial production, and Army wanted TAI to implement MAM-L on ANKA-S lmao.
In one year, they successfully build one new wing that can carry MAM-Ls under itself, then they starts tests.
And now, they are building planes.
----------------------------------
Summary: TAI did what Army asked in record times, the problem is not TAI. Problem is the Army ranks that does not know what they need, what they want from the company.