What's new

Turkish Unmanned Vehicle Programs

KALE radiator and intercooler for UAV’s


DC6CC8F4-9657-4F20-A6D7-E175574EEA47.jpeg
218E58C7-9595-46FB-8856-53BBBCCFFE14.jpeg
 
Interesting development of conceptual radial motor from a small Turkish Paramotor engine company. Engine could be very useful for tactical UAVs.
2EN572.jpg

Power output can be increased by adding multiple power units.
14990916_1350851694934788_4281612329653365130_o.jpg



looks like 2 stroke engine, i don't think they will use it for. It will drain feul fast.
 
TAI's new dual-engine UAV will use the TEI PD-170 engine.

► “TEI tasarımı İHA motorunu kullanacak çift motorlu yeni İHA”
"ANKA’nın 2 motorlu versiyonu için kendi imkanlarımızla çalışma başlattık. İsmi büyük ihtimalle farklı olur. Mevcut tecrübelerimizi aktarıp çok çabuk çıkarabileceğiz. TEI motoruyla (TEI PD-170) uçacak. TEI motoru bitirdi, yakın zamanda sayın Bakan’ın teşrifiyle teslim töreni olacak onun. Faydalı yük olarak çok şey takabileceğiz, büyük bir uçak olacak. Müşterinin isteğine göre lego gibi istediğini takabiliriz. Uydu kontrolü, SAR radarı takabiliriz. Diğer yandan, ANKA’nın kanadını yeniden tasarladık. Onun imalatına başlıyoruz. Bir yıl sürer diye düşünüyorum. Bugünkü ANKA’yı daha güçlü hale getiriyor."

https://www.dunya.com/gundem/t-625-sivil-helikopter-haziran-2018de-ucacak-haberi-385168
 
looks like 2 stroke engine, i don't think they will use it for. It will drain feul fast.

Plenty of 2 stroke engines used for UAVs, that have 10-24 hours of endurance.. Plus as the the spec sheet denotes, ALIDA SSRM engine has the ability to shutdown cylinders to save fuel or in an event of failure of one of the cylinders the other cylinders can operate without it - redundancy is key.
 
Bayraktar doesn't look so impressive as Anka but it doesn't have to look impressive, it has to fulfil its missions which are for sure not same as Ankas so who cares actually how it looks like. As we can read both are performing their missions well especially Bayraktar as it was much earlier armed then Anka. Why aren’t you just happy guys, you have all those vehicles made by yourself, just remember none of your NATO "allies" wanted to sell you any of their important high-tech weapons and they actually still don't do it! Enjoy your progress and support your leadership, be sure there are many around you who don’t wish you anything good and would like to take you away everything you have at first point they feel that you’re weak enough to be besieged.
 
Bayraktar doesn't look so impressive as Anka but it doesn't have to look impressive, it has to fulfil its missions which are for sure not same as Ankas so who cares actually how it looks like. As we can read both are performing their missions well especially Bayraktar as it was much earlier armed then Anka. Why aren’t you just happy guys, you have all those vehicles made by yourself, just remember none of your NATO "allies" wanted to sell you any of their important high-tech weapons and they actually still don't do it! Enjoy your progress and support your leadership, be sure there are many around you who don’t wish you anything good and would like to take you away everything you have at first point they feel that you’re weak enough to be besieged.

He is a Lebanese, maybe he is not happy because he prefers "great looking" Iranian stuff :D

Turks are very happy with it. Especially when we consider it has evaporated hundreds of rats just in 1 year!
 
He is a Lebanese, maybe he is not happy because he prefers "great looking" Iranian stuff :D

Turks are very happy with it. Especially when we consider it has evaporated hundreds of rats just in 1 year!

No,
As i know that Lebanese guy love and supporting Turkey, but i dont know much about him.
 
It seems to me Bayraktar is more efficient than Anka, right ? Despite its good look and all publicity about Anka, Bayraktar has given more result.
Maybe we should invest more in Bayraktar rather than Anka for futur project ? Or at least push toward the best firm between the two.
 
It seems to me Bayraktar is more efficient than Anka, right ? Despite its good look and all publicity about Anka, Bayraktar has given more result.
Maybe we should invest more in Bayraktar rather than Anka for futur project ? Or at least push toward the best firm between the two.
Bayraktar and Anka are completely different class. Dont compare the two products.
 
He is a Lebanese, maybe he is not happy because he prefers "great looking" Iranian stuff :D

Turks are very happy with it. Especially when we consider it has evaporated hundreds of rats just in 1 year!
iranusdrone.jpg

Do you think that i like this shit ?? No. of course i don't like iran :D.
No,
As i know that Lebanese guy love and supporting Turkey, but i dont know much about him.
I don't just love and support Turkey. I am Turkish also :D
 
It seems to me Bayraktar is more efficient than Anka, right ? Despite its good look and all publicity about Anka, Bayraktar has given more result.
Maybe we should invest more in Bayraktar rather than Anka for futur project ? Or at least push toward the best firm between the two.
They designed and produced TB-2 in just 2 years or something like that. They are really more efficient than TAI in this regard.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom