Brother, do you know why our air force is against the use of canards and twin-engine configuration? I understand that both come with their advantages as well as disadvantages, but I just wonder how our air force reasons regarding their wishes.
-Both single-engine & Delta Canard fighter configurations will possess a maximum take-off weight of between
50,000lb and 60,000lb, whereas the maximum take-off weight of the
twin-engine concept measures a littile more between
60,000lb and 70,000lb.
-TAI wants to go ahead with twin engine variant.
-Turkish AirForce and TAI officials visited installations of
PW, GE and Eurojet.
*For single engine configuration, It is F-135 engines talked with P&W.
*For twin engine configuration, Officials are in talk with
GE for F-110-GE-132 and Eurojet for EJ-230. (As you see At twin engine configuration, The solution is bigger to reach expected limits.)
Turkish AirForce requires TF-X fighters with thrust power of
40000lb+(for all configuration,
It is the thrust limit of TF-X) on a single engine configuration with F-135 engines (
TuAF wants to benefit Logistic advantages of same engines for two different new generation aircraft to be joined into inventory in 2020's. F-35 and TF-X) but;
Due to export policies of USA for such critical and new powerfull products, It is being discussed the impossibility of acquiring F-135 so
TAI wants to develop twin engine configuration with other engine solutions typed above (
2 GE-135(32000lbx2 or
2 EJ-230 ( 23000lbx2). At all conditions, It is expected to have a fighter design which will have a thrust ratio more than
40000lb+.
TF-X Twin Engine
What would be the role of the TFX.. i always thought that it will be a air-superiorty fighter. Since we are getting F-35s for multi-purpose role.
F-35: Air to Ground equipped with SOM-J, HGK-1,2,3; KGK-1,2,3; DMT, NEB-1,2, LGK
F-X: Air Superiority Fighter (Main AA missiles: Roketsan/Tubitak/Aselsan SRM, LRM)
T-X: Almost same cockpit with F-X along with similar but smaller fuselage design jet trainer...