H. Dawary
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2019
- Messages
- 565
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
You are giving credence to countries that are frankly too economically stunted to overtake the US influence. Ultimately, we are not there to have a permanent military presence in any of those countries. Even so -
- Libya, we are very close to the government a have exclusive oil deals and solid influence, including military and economic
- Iraq, same deal. We are well entrenched and influential. I believe the Iranian embassy got burned down by the Shia mobs recently. AND honestly, what is a completely broke Iran going to do - more terrorist attacks? Our military bases and presence are still there. Iran could not even help it with ISIS. We are security guarantor
- Afghanistan & the Taliban- they have to agree to us having a large embassy and have to agree to zero violence and no support of terror groups, fight elections to show legitimacy and work with the current Afghan government - and then and only then we will start relocating our troops after two years of showing us progress
The Taliban might agree to an embassy, but if you think we are going to agree with soldiers being there, like Japan and Korea, then you are heavily mistaken. In fact, I'd be more than happy if your nation remained for another 100 years and sent another 2 million soldiers, that way we can bankrupt your nation a lot more faster.