Tosha Khana Record about Maryam Nawaz, PMLN and PDM
- Thread starter AZ1
- Start date
ziaulislam
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,621
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
In other words Imran Khan is not saint but didn't everyone know he is not a saint.
Atleast he follows the rules and doesn't has undeclared assets like others
Hence we should either stay quiet or support Pdm-military establishment since toshakhana gift is equivalent to stealing billions in Mayfair
HAIDER
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 21, 2006
- Messages
- 33,771
- Reaction score
- 14
- Country
- Location
What IK paid is more then the total amount paid by Nawaz Zardari families .
ghazi52
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Messages
- 102,832
- Reaction score
- 106
- Country
- Location
,.,.,
March 13, 2023
The Lahore High Court (LHC) ordered the federal government on Monday to submit the records of Toshakhana gifts received by public office holders from foreign governments and dignitaries since 1947.
The Toshakhana is a department under the administrative control of the Cabinet Division and stores precious gifts given to rulers, parliamentarians, bureaucrats, and officials by heads of other governments and states and foreign dignitaries.
According to Toshakhana rules, gifts/presents and other such materials received by persons to whom these rules apply shall be reported to the Cabinet Division.
A day ago, the government — after initially expressing reluctance — publicly released the much-awaited records of Toshakhana gifts from 2002 to 2022. It had already submitted the details to the LHC on Feb 21 during the hearing of a petition seeking to make Toshakhana records public.
The plea — filed by Munir Ahmad through Advocate Azhar Siddique last year — had asked to make public complete details of the Toshakhana gifts received by political rulers and bureaucrats from foreign dignitaries since 1947.
However, on Feb 23, the federal government had told the LHC that details since 2002 were being “declassified”. Upon being inquired by Justice Asim Hafeez if the government did not have the records of gifts bought before 2002, the additional attorney general had replied they were not computerised.
“The court will pronounce the verdict after having a full review [of the Toshakhana records]. We will also see who were these gifts given by,” he said.
The LHC judge further noted that it was also necessary to review the aspect of “why these gifts are given”.
Here, the petitioner’s counsel asked: “If a minister is taking a gift, it is understandable but those who have public positions, how can they take gifts?”
To that, Justice Hafeez replied that the court did not have jurisdiction over the matter and suggested that the petitioner approaches relevant forums for this purpose.
The hearing was subsequently adjourned for half an hour and later resumed inside Justice Hafeez’s chamber.
During the hearing, the attorney general said that the federal government had drafted a policy related to the Toshakhana. “A 466-page report on making Toshakhana records from 2002 to 2023 public has already been submitted in the court.”
The court then ordered the federal government to submit the minutes of the federal cabinet’s meetings on the Toshakhana matter by March 21 and adjourned the hearing.
The plea stated: “The right to information is an integral part of a progressive democratic state and the same has been elaborated by the superior courts saying the right to information in all matters of public importance is indisputably a fundamental right guaranteed under Article(s) 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.”
According to the petitioner, the right to information stems from the requirement that members of a democratic society should be sufficiently informed that they may intelligently influence the decision which may affect them.
Therefore, he argued, the people of Pakistan had the right to know every public act, everything that is done in a public way, by public functionaries and their chosen representatives.
The petitioner contended that people at large were entitled to know details of every public transaction and acquire information in all matters of public importance.
“This enables people to contribute in debate on social and moral issues and matter of public importance.”
The plea urged the court to order the respondents to make public the details of assets gifted to rulers as well as bureaucrats and also provide the names, details, information, documentation and materials in respect of the persons/officials who have obtained the assets by making the payment.
The petitioner also sought details of the methodology used to determine the price of the Toshakhana articles.
Ministries of Parliamentary Affairs and Interior and Pakistan Information Commission have been arrayed as respondents in the petition.
‘Who gave these gifts?’: LHC seeks records of Toshakhana gifts from before 2002
Rana BilalMarch 13, 2023
The Lahore High Court (LHC) ordered the federal government on Monday to submit the records of Toshakhana gifts received by public office holders from foreign governments and dignitaries since 1947.
The Toshakhana is a department under the administrative control of the Cabinet Division and stores precious gifts given to rulers, parliamentarians, bureaucrats, and officials by heads of other governments and states and foreign dignitaries.
According to Toshakhana rules, gifts/presents and other such materials received by persons to whom these rules apply shall be reported to the Cabinet Division.
A day ago, the government — after initially expressing reluctance — publicly released the much-awaited records of Toshakhana gifts from 2002 to 2022. It had already submitted the details to the LHC on Feb 21 during the hearing of a petition seeking to make Toshakhana records public.
The plea — filed by Munir Ahmad through Advocate Azhar Siddique last year — had asked to make public complete details of the Toshakhana gifts received by political rulers and bureaucrats from foreign dignitaries since 1947.
However, on Feb 23, the federal government had told the LHC that details since 2002 were being “declassified”. Upon being inquired by Justice Asim Hafeez if the government did not have the records of gifts bought before 2002, the additional attorney general had replied they were not computerised.
The hearing
Hearing the plea today, Justice Hafeez ordered the federal government to submit the complete details today, saying: “Present the [Toshakhana] records from before 2002 in court, no matter in which form they are.”“The court will pronounce the verdict after having a full review [of the Toshakhana records]. We will also see who were these gifts given by,” he said.
The LHC judge further noted that it was also necessary to review the aspect of “why these gifts are given”.
Here, the petitioner’s counsel asked: “If a minister is taking a gift, it is understandable but those who have public positions, how can they take gifts?”
To that, Justice Hafeez replied that the court did not have jurisdiction over the matter and suggested that the petitioner approaches relevant forums for this purpose.
The hearing was subsequently adjourned for half an hour and later resumed inside Justice Hafeez’s chamber.
During the hearing, the attorney general said that the federal government had drafted a policy related to the Toshakhana. “A 466-page report on making Toshakhana records from 2002 to 2023 public has already been submitted in the court.”
The court then ordered the federal government to submit the minutes of the federal cabinet’s meetings on the Toshakhana matter by March 21 and adjourned the hearing.
The plea
The plea seeking the details was filed by lawyer Munir Ahmad through Advocate Azhar Siddique in December 2022.The plea stated: “The right to information is an integral part of a progressive democratic state and the same has been elaborated by the superior courts saying the right to information in all matters of public importance is indisputably a fundamental right guaranteed under Article(s) 19 and 19-A of the Constitution.”
According to the petitioner, the right to information stems from the requirement that members of a democratic society should be sufficiently informed that they may intelligently influence the decision which may affect them.
Therefore, he argued, the people of Pakistan had the right to know every public act, everything that is done in a public way, by public functionaries and their chosen representatives.
The petitioner contended that people at large were entitled to know details of every public transaction and acquire information in all matters of public importance.
“This enables people to contribute in debate on social and moral issues and matter of public importance.”
The plea urged the court to order the respondents to make public the details of assets gifted to rulers as well as bureaucrats and also provide the names, details, information, documentation and materials in respect of the persons/officials who have obtained the assets by making the payment.
The petitioner also sought details of the methodology used to determine the price of the Toshakhana articles.
Ministries of Parliamentary Affairs and Interior and Pakistan Information Commission have been arrayed as respondents in the petition.
Enigma SIG
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,593
- Reaction score
- -5
- Country
- Location
ziaulislam
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 23,621
- Reaction score
- 9
- Country
- Location
correct but he is not a saint, a saint would never choose the path of accepting gifts..but thena saint would neverjoin poltics any way and would never get votes and would never let so many MPAs with plenty of them shady to join him.
by this definition no-one was a saint, not even Jinnah who made several corrupt people & nawabs to join his party to achieve an objective.
lol i dont think we have an accurate record but we shouldn't disclose records of pre 1950. last thing you want is to make Jinnah controversial if he kept a pen or something which i doubt he did he was too rich but still
because the bar here is too high PMLN things stealing cars(which is illegal) is okay but paying appropriate amount for watch isnt
Mugen
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2018
- Messages
- 3,386
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
But exposing them is not enough, people of Pakistan should skin these pigs alive for destroying the lives of many generation of Pakistanis.
We need to get angry at them.
Jazzbot
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2010
- Messages
- 10,382
- Reaction score
- 14
- Country
- Location
ghazi52
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2007
- Messages
- 102,832
- Reaction score
- 106
- Country
- Location
READ: List of Toshakhana gifts from 2002 to 2023
The list was revealed on instructions of PM ShehbazOur Correspondent
March 13, 2023
The federal government has made the 466-page record of Toshakhana (gift depository) from 2002 to 2023 public by uploading it on the official website of the Cabinet Division.
The move was made on the instructions of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.
The recipients of the gifts from foreign dignitaries include former presidents, prime ministers, federal ministers and government officials.
According to the record, the names of former president Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf, former prime ministers Shaukat Aziz, Yousuf Raza Gilani, Nawaz Sharif, Raja Parvaiz Ashraf and Imran Khan are included among the recipient.
The Toshakhana records of incumbent Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and President Dr Arif Alvi have also been uploaded.
READ: List of Toshakhana gifts from 2002 to 2023 | The Express Tribune
The list was revealed on instructions of PM Shehbaz
Asimzranger
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
- Messages
- 3,798
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Shehbaz Sharif retained a bowl and coin from Toshakhana.
Woh kehtay hon gey: Maangnay aata hai aur maangnay kay liay piyala bhi hum hi sey ley kar jata hai.
Woh kehtay hon gey: Maangnay aata hai aur maangnay kay liay piyala bhi hum hi sey ley kar jata hai.
Azad_ Kashmiri
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Messages
- 409
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
@muhammadhafeezmalik you and your namak haram party have been caught been with your pants down!
Who the fcuk is Maryam! What she ever for Pakistan! In her jalsa’s you and other horny men have semi hards! Thats all she is good at
Namak harami Nawaz Sharif and his other clan. Whilst Pakistani’s are suffering in Pakistan, the fat fcuker and his two loony tunes are living a life of luxury in Londstan
Who the fcuk is Maryam! What she ever for Pakistan! In her jalsa’s you and other horny men have semi hards! Thats all she is good at
Namak harami Nawaz Sharif and his other clan. Whilst Pakistani’s are suffering in Pakistan, the fat fcuker and his two loony tunes are living a life of luxury in Londstan
Similar threads
