Thunder on ADA scramble

[imadul]

Guys, this much information i was able to obtain.

''The engine and everything else is the same. PAC folks have done a good job eliminating 70% of the smoke from the engine by working on a smokeless combustion chamber''.

? You mean PAC did that improvement not Kilmov?

 

[Ultima Thule]

Thanks this stupid image confused me

https://www.bing.com/images/search?...0638192215&selectedindex=2&ajaxhist=0&first=1

but difference is quite clear the above posted image by @Windjammer is clearly SD-10 not R-darter, "main difference is SD-10 has fins in the middle of the body, whereas R-darter has their fins much further near to the seeker section of the missiles

 

[CriticalThought]

but difference is quite clear the above posted image by @Windjammer is clearly SD-10 not R-darter, "main difference is SD-10 has fins in the middle of the body, whereas R-darter has their fins much further near to the seeker section of the missiles

Viewing on a small mobile screen....

 

[messiach]

Correct.

Its called umbilical cord in military aviation parlance.
This is the technical name.

It is responsible for power supply, data/signal supply and it also supplies cooling (nitrogen) gas for missile's IR seeker against overheating before launch.

Known information. Thank God and then Putin's Russia for saving grace.

The point being, when it comes to the cutting edge of technology which can act as make or break in a war, don't expect a foreign expert to come and hold your hands and show you what to do. You are on your own, use your own wits and intellect to understand threats and deal with them.



WOW!!!!!!!!!!!! This is BIG news. Our engineers have actually modified the Russian RD-93 engine???? Masha Allah. Alhamdulillah.

@messiach

 

[MastanKhan]

and it also supplies cooling (nitrogen) gas for missile's IR seeker against overheating before launch.

Hi,

And that is why---during peace times---we never see an aircraft with missiles on the wings---.

 

[messiach]

I have received positive reports for just ended plaaf-paf joint exercises which included jets with AESA capable radars.

 

[Bilal Khan (Quwa)]

I have received positive reports for just ended plaaf-paf joint exercises which included jets with AESA capable radars.

The AESA-equipped ones are probably the J-11BS (i.e. the one AVM Haseeb Paracha flew in).

 

[messiach]

Partly correct.
FC1 did very well at low, mid and high altitudes against heavy fighters. Contrary to claims, heavy fighters were unable to get a fix on it. Our easterly neighbours should watch out.

The AESA-equipped ones are probably the J-11BS (i.e. the one AVM Haseeb Paracha flew in).

 

[Khadim e Darul Ehsaan]

Partly correct.
FC1 did very well at low, mid and high altitudes against heavy fighters. Contrary to claims, heavy fighters were unable to get a fix on it. Our easterly neighbours should watch out.

Thanks madam for this post .
Happy to see that thunder has done something gud, first article of j11b victory made thunder lover's a little bit worried about its performance against flankers

 

[CriticalThought]

Thanks madam for this post .
Happy to see that thunder has done something gud, first article of j11b victory made thunder lover's a little bit worried about its performance against flankers

No it didn't! We always knew that J-11 succeeded only after several rounds of combat. Do you think Thunder must have a 100% success rate against all fighter in the world? That would be unreasonable!

 

[CriticalThought]

I have received positive reports for just ended plaaf-paf joint exercises which included jets with AESA capable radars.

Madam, per my info, at least some Chinese are not happy with our ability to deal with EM threats. They consider us a non-starter. Hence, there was no point in including advanced EM warfare as part of the exercise. We need serious modernization in the areas of ELINT, EW, and SEAD/DEAD.

 

[Khadim e Darul Ehsaan]

No it didn't! We always knew that J-11 succeeded only after several rounds of combat. Do you think Thunder must have a 100% success rate against all fighter in the world? That would be unreasonable!

Yeah offcourse 100% is something exceptional secondly dogfight also depends on pilots too, single mistake can give can advantage to opponent

 

[HRK]

Thanks madam for this post .
Happy to see that thunder has done something gud, first article of j11b victory made thunder lover's a little bit worried about its performance against flankers

bhai JF-17 which participated from our side were from Haider (correction: PAF No. 2 Sqn Minhas, re-equipped with JF-17 in April-16) the newest JF-17 squadron with relatively new JF-17 pilots ....

 

[Khadim e Darul Ehsaan]

bhai JF-17 which participated from our side were from Haider squarden the newest JF-17 with relatively new JF-17 pilots ....

Sir black panther , spider, minhas and tailchoppers r the squaderns i think as jf17 operator
Haider r mirrage operator am i right ?

 

[messiach]

No.

Madam, per my info, at least some Chinese are not happy with our ability to deal with EM threats.

This is work in definite progress.

We need serious modernization in the areas of ELINT, EW, and SEAD/DEAD.