What's new

Those Dammed Commie Muslims!

Why are Americans on here even defending this BS? This is the exact same kind of mentality you accuse us of.
 
.
:rofl:

oh, yes... the evil commie afghan regime, who allowed females to sinfully show flesh, were removed by the glorious mujahideen who made the females to become virtuous through the blue burqa... hurrah the mujahideen... hurrah their benefactors, the valiant cia... hurrah the british government...

i present to you the virtuous blue burqa, also called the shuttlecock burqa... the ladies, by the way, are voting in some election... oh, why to them the evil commie regime... they must forward the democratic ways of uncle sam... better for them to be dead than red... hurrah... hurrah...

BurqaVoters.jpg

Off topic : inside blue burqa, there is hidden beauty...
if u know what i mean..:p:
 
. . . . .
Critic: What is your opinion on Shia?
Islamist: They are heretics. They do not represent the true Islam.
Critic: What do you think of Wahabis ?
Islamist: False Muslims. Their actions and teachings do not represent true Islam
Critic: What do you think of Taliban?
Islamist: False Muslims. They do not represent Islam.
Critic: What do you think of the Muslim Brotherhood ?
Islamist: Also false Muslims. They do not represent Islam.
Critic: How about ISIS and its actions in Syria?
Islamist: They are not true Muslims either. Their actions go against Islam
Critic: What do you think of those suicide bombers who blow themselves up in the name of Islam ?
Islamist: They do not represent the teachingsof Islam.
Critic: Why are most Islamic countries backward in regards to science and technology and progress ?
Islamist: Because Muslims do not understand Islam properly and do not follow its teachings. Also, they follow leaders and rulers and sheikhs who are false Muslims and do not apply Islam properly.
Critic: What of the problems of forced marriages, child marriages, lashing, whipping, beating, stoning,enforcing the veil, executions for apostasy and blasphemy prevalent in some Islamic communities ?
Islamist: Those actions are not from Islam, and those who do them are not true Muslims.
Critic: What do you say of the hadiths that advocate and support execution for apostasy and fighting non-believers ? and what about the numerous tafsirs and sources written by Muslim scholars (including those who established the major Islamic schools of jurisprudence) that confirm those, and clearly state that the earlier peaceful verses were abrogated later on by more violent ones?
Islamist: They are all false. They're not truly from Islam, and those scholars who wrote this have misunderstood what the real teachings of Islam
Critic: Well, how many Muslims are there ?
Muslim: Allahu Akbar!! Islam is the fastest growing and most widespread religion in the world. We are the Ummah of more than 1.7 billion followers. Allahu Akbar!!
 
.
What do you say of the hadiths that advocate and support execution for apostasy and fighting non-believers ? and what about the numerous tafsirs and sources written by Muslim scholars (including those who established the major Islamic schools of jurisprudence) that confirm those, and clearly state that the earlier peaceful verses were abrogated later on by more violent ones?
What a load of bull. No tafsirs state that ''the earlier peaceful verses were abrogated by violent ones'', only that fighting was made permitted at a certain point in time and even then clear limitations were placed.
''Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors.'' [Quran 2:190]
Any hadiths that advocate fighting non-believers just because they are non believers are in contradiction to the Quran and thus invalid.

The point of this little joke becomes worthless when it's riddled with so much BS.

As for Fox News, well, they once said that non-Muslims aren't allowed to go to Birmingham. It's like the American version of Mullah On-line.
 
.
It's like the American version of Mullah On-line.
As usual, you confused objective news reporting with colorful commentaries.

Fox News is number one in the US cable TV news sector. News -- got that ?

Pirro on Fox is one of the many many many colorful commentators about current events that spans the entire cable TV spectrum, from CNN to MSNBC to Fox. Her show on Fox is no different in ideas than shows on CNN or MSNBC. Pirro's being feisty and opinionated is perfectly inline with what a commentator is ALLOWED to be. Pirro never claimed to be a professional journalist. She is a COMMENTATOR. How damn difficult is that to distinguish out ? You guys' obsession with Fox should be studied by shrinks. :lol:

Finally, the comparison to 'Mullah On-line' is absurd. Fox News do not issues religion based fatwas. The typical Fox News viewer is probably smarter than the one who follows 'Mullah On-line'.
 
. . . .
As usual, you confused objective news reporting with colorful commentaries.

Fox News is number one in the US cable TV news sector. News -- got that ?

Pirro on Fox is one of the many many many colorful commentators about current events that spans the entire cable TV spectrum, from CNN to MSNBC to Fox. Her show on Fox is no different in ideas than shows on CNN or MSNBC. Pirro's being feisty and opinionated is perfectly inline with what a commentator is ALLOWED to be. Pirro never claimed to be a professional journalist. She is a COMMENTATOR. How damn difficult is that to distinguish out ? You guys' obsession with Fox should be studied by shrinks. :lol:

Finally, the comparison to 'Mullah On-line' is absurd. Fox News do not issues religion based fatwas. The typical Fox News viewer is probably smarter than the one who follows 'Mullah On-line'.

Man, you keep defending the indefensible. Here you are trying to talk me into it, and on the other end, you have that googly-eyed she-cleric, shouting 'mooosluum, waer, teyyerrorasts'.

If there was ever a prime candidate for an adult diaper advert:

adsd.png


Only in her case, the diaper would need to cover the shit coming out her mouth.
 
.
Fox News is number one in the US cable TV news sector. News -- got that ?
If that is number one, God save us from the rest.
Pirro on Fox is one of the many many many colorful commentators about current events that spans the entire cable TV spectrum, from CNN to MSNBC to Fox. Her show on Fox is no different in ideas than shows on CNN or MSNBC.
And Mullahs Online are one of the many, many, many, 'colorful commentators' on some channels that consider themselves to be actual news channels, just like Fox.
Pirro's being feisty and opinionated is perfectly inline with what a commentator is ALLOWED to be. Pirro never claimed to be a professional journalist. She is a COMMENTATOR.
Fine, she's a 'colourful commentator', so she doesn't have to be a responsible with what she says on her show. Granted, but on the other hand, we had a ''Terrorism expert'' giving everyone his 'expert opinion' that Birmingham is a 'Caliphate' . Those 'commentator rights' don't apply to someone claiming to be an expert

Ironically, the banner under there said ''We report, you decide''.
Finally, the comparison to 'Mullah On-line' is absurd. Fox News do not issues religion based fatwas.
A fatwa is a scholar's opinion. Fox news does have religious people 'issuing' their opinions. Fatwa or not, their and the other hosts' logic and styles are very similar, so my comparison is valid.
The typical Fox News viewer is probably smarter than the one who follows 'Mullah On-line'.
We should organize a televised IQ test and competition for that - will be the funniest shit ever!
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom