This is Asian countries ally/threat

[mujhaidind]

what did U.S do to you.
what does race and skin color got to do with anything.
japan
south korea
taiwan

These countries would be more prosperous and peaceful if US hadn't intervened in their affairs. US has created enemies for them.

Skin color is very important for you whites expecially you Americans. Have your forgoten your past and ignoring your present?

FYI US has supported many separatists movements in India and has also imposed scanctions on it in the past. You also try to bully us through US dominated orgs like WTO and IMF.

Only idiots in India will will see US as their ally. Most of the Indians hate the USA. These fake surveys don't prove a thing.

 

[extra terrestrial]

Some of it don't look accurate to me. How did they get these result, public survey or political analysis? like how can Indonesia consider US as ally and threat ?and also I don't think Malaysia would consider US a bigger threat than Singapore, and I don't think BD considers India a threat but I can be wrong here, I always thought they were pro Indians

Seems Bangladeshi hate India more than that of Pakistans

India has always been a threat to Bangladesh and the hatred will always be there due to some stereotypes. Even after the 1971 war, within weeks mass protests erupted against the Indian troops who were unwilling to leave Bangladesh.

Besides, Indians are not reliable!

 

[mujhaidind]

Despite this, one has to understand that there is a genetic, phenotypic and linguistic similarity between Pakistani and North Indian populations to those in Europe, Middle East.

We all have some common genes. That doesn't mean we are all the same. Even arabs have some african blood. Doesn't make these two same. Indians are mixed. They have every type of blood. You need to see the latest Indian DNA research results.

In the business of empire, there is really little to no consideration of the cultural affinities.

Why is that they treated colonies in US,canada and Australia better? They even treated the white australian convicts better than Indians.

You are a bit ignornant about Indian history. See for yourself what British rulers and politicians had to say about Indian race and their religion.

 

[atatwolf]

Some North Indians, and Pakistanis actually look European. Genetically, they are kin to the European Caucasians.

But do the whites consider them white? No.

Whites destroyed India. Only Indians with low self esteem will love their white masters.

Actually even Indians with peanut like skin color see themselves as white here in Europe. Maybe because they think they are part of Anglo-saxon world? I think most Europeans don't see Indians as white but a lot of Indians themselves do.

 

[Aepsilons]

We all have some common genes. That doesn't mean we are all the same. Even arabs have some african blood. Doesn't make these two same. Indians are mixed. They have every type of blood. You need to see the latest Indian DNA research results.

Why is that they treated colonies in US,canada and Australia better? They even treated the white australian convicts better than Indians.

You are a bit ignornant about Indian history. See for yourself what British rulers and politicians had to say about Indian race and their religion.

British treated many of their non -British subjects with bias as well. The British showed contempt for the Boers in South Africa in the mid to late 19th century , going to war against the Boers, who were descendants of Dutch colonials. The treatment against the Irish, as well as the Americans come to mind. There's a reason why America declared independence in 1776. And fought two bloody wars with the British.

The point is, not everything was rosy in even "white" colonies of the British Empire. The business of empire isn't meant to make friends, but to benefit the mother country.

 

[mujhaidind]

Actually even Indians with peanut like skin color see themselves as white here in Europe. Maybe because they think they are part of Anglo-saxon world? I think most Europeans don't see Indians as white but a lot of Indians themselves do.

You are only white if you skin is pale like that of a ghost. That's the reason even slavic who have some asian blood in them are considered to be whites these days.

Indians don't have that pale skin-tone except the extinct anglo-Indians.

British treated many of their non -British subjects with bias as well. The British showed contempt for the Boers in South Africa in the mid to late 19th century , going to war against the Boers, who were descendants of Dutch colonials. The treatment against the Irish, as well as the Americans come to mind. There's a reason why America declared independence in 1776. And fought two bloody wars with the British.

Boers were always rebellious. Indians weren't at the beginning. Infact many though British rule would prove good for India.

Irish weren't considered to be pure white at that time. They too were rebellious.

Treatment of white European Americans cannot be compared to Indians. It like comparing treatment of guantanamo bay prisoners to treatment of prisoners in a Scandinavian jail.

 

[sahaliyan]

British treated many of their non -British subjects with bias as well. The British showed contempt for the Boers in South Africa in the mid to late 19th century , going to war against the Boers, who were descendants of Dutch colonials. The treatment against the Irish, as well as the Americans come to mind. There's a reason why America declared independence in 1776. And fought two bloody wars with the British.

The point is, not everything was rosy in even "white" colonies of the British Empire. The business of empire isn't meant to make friends, but to benefit the mother country.

British treated Boers better than they treat Blacks,even after the British defeated the Boers,they still let the Boers ruled the South Africa,the race surely played a role in this,see how British treatred the south Africa and British raj,you can see it.

 

[INDIC]

Actually even Indians with peanut like skin color see themselves as white here in Europe. Maybe because they think they are part of Anglo-saxon world? I think most Europeans don't see Indians as white but a lot of Indians themselves do.

what's your problem with Indians, we see ourselves as browns, not as whites.

 

[atatwolf]

we see ourselves as browns, not as whites.

My point is not all Indians see it like that.

 

[jericho]

lol at some of the discussion about white/ brown, i don't see why people need to make a big deal out of it, if some 'non-white' person consider himself white, i don't see the issue there, i mean its more like a 'you happy I happy' kind of thing. If it doesn't offend me and makes the other party happy, i don't give a flying turnip if someone ones to call himself white/black/brown/purple/blue, there are bigger things to worry about than this nonsense

 

[INDIC]

My point is not all Indians see it like that.

We see ourselves as browns and call Europeans as Gora(Whiteman).

 

[Arya Desa]

Outside South Asia they need each other to save their @$$ from whites

In South Asia, we still need to save each other's @$$3$ from whites using economic, social,and military (in the case of Pakistan) warfare against us.

Most Indians I know consider themselves white

Since 1/2 of New Delhi is in Europe, we consider ourselves European.

 

[Kabira]

Politically speaking, the British did take advantage of the Indian establishment. However, genetically, and linguistically, there is similarity between the native Caucasians in India and Pakistan with the European Caucasians. I mean, huge swathes of European states speak a variant of Indo-Aryan Language. Genetically and Phenotypically speaking, as well, there is semblance with North Indians, Pakistanis -- to Southern Europeans.

Let me compare a Pakistani male with an Italian male:

Pakistani

vs

Italian

You are wrong, i don't know about Indians but Pakistanis do not look like South Europeans. The exemple you posted is not even that lighter, look like eastern Pakistani (punjab&sindh). While many northen Pakistanis have lighter skin tone but they still look different.

 

[NiceGuy]

I can believe there might be lingering presence in Laos but Cambo is not a communist state. There are also thousands of NGOs there. There must be some evidence of this. You say they are disguised as labourers? Do you know any of them personally? Are they seasonal labourers or do they live in Cambo?

Many Cambodia generals r VNese, u think VNese general in Camb will put their trust on Khmer- Cambodia soldiers ??

Cambodia: THE VIETNAMESE NATIONALS BEHIND THE COUP [FR] (1997)

Lt. Gen. Chay Saing Yun, Co-secretary of state widely believed as a Vietnamese national, Chay Saing Yun rarely appears in public meeting, especially with the press. He does not want to be questioned about his background. He is one of the hard-liners and difficult to deal with. During the so-called aborted coup of July 1994 sin song and prince Chrapong, Chay Saing Yun fled to Vietnam.

...........................

Lt. Gen. Meas Sophea, Deputy chief of the general staff widely believed as a Vietnamese national, Meas Sophea has a strong connection with Hun Sen. His father was known to be a north Vietnamese (Vietcong) Colonel. He played a major role during the 5-6 July coup.

Just simply get Camb's passport, then VNese will become Cambodian, VN soldiers will become Camb soldiers. Cambodian even complain that many Camb anti-riot police r VNese coz they only speak VNese.

 

[andy_hujian]

Yes high rate. This time by USD I think.

Who ever killed millions of Vietnamese which is foreigner ? It's Chinese.
And vice versa.

Staying to close to the U.S, you lose the party. U.S., in the past, never had an ally relationship with a communism country.
That's why Vietnam sent someone to China a week ago. They have been reconciled.

Why the hell Malaysia sees China as an ally?
They have disputes in the south China sea.