What's new

The worldview of Kuan Yew and his stooges

You need to look at who bring us to Malaysia in the first place. It was Kuan Yew.

Every Singaporean hate this idea because we will need stooge under Islamo. Then Kuan Yew think he can reason his way out of Islamo and naively believe that Islamo will let him have power if he win elections.

Result is Islamo almost wage Jihad. Islamo keep rallying Islamo underlings to attack Chinese by accusing Kuan Yew of shitting on Mohamad and Islam.
So what's your problem? Later on Singapore was kicked out of Malaysia because Singapore demanded a fair system where everyone was equal. When Singapore was kicked out, LKY made sure that it wouldn't get forcefully included under its own apartheid laws. Is it even necessary to mention that? He tried and failed but he corrected his mistake. His leadership is the reason why your country is one of the richest today considering how it was 50 years ago. Seems like you hate everything on earth. Maybe you should apply for Mars One and settle down in Mars far away from the Earth's problems.
 
.
OK, but that changed. That it's not reality now. Singapore is an entity

There is a sold out on Singaporean Chinese, in favor of peranakan, white man and India nationals.

Local Malay got the worst hit by Kuan Yew-ism. Local Indian hate Kuan Yew also.

Modi will not be here and declare day of mourning in India, not without good reason. Kuan Yew definitely sold Singapore to India.

PRC also got some perks but I will say India and white man got a larger piece of cake.
 
.
One of my high school classmates was from Malaysia. He's been to Singapore, and though I haven't, I can believe what he says:

"All the rules and restrictions in Singapore have made all Chinese there assimilated bananas in their own country. Nothing but naieve robots."
 
.
You need to look at who bring us to Malaysia in the first place. It was Kuan Yew.

Every Singaporean hate this idea because we will need stooge under Islamo. Then Kuan Yew think he can reason his way out of Islamo and naively believe that Islamo will let him have power if he win elections.

Result is Islamo almost wage Jihad. Islamo keep rallying Islamo underlings to attack Chinese by accusing Kuan Yew of shitting on Mohamad and Islam.
Stop repeating the word 'Islamo'. It was not between Islam and Budhism or whatever religion Singaporean Chinese used to follow, but between the ethnic Malays and Chinese. A simple conflict of races, which is still going on today. It is not only Chinese who are viewed or treated as 2nd class citizen, even the Muslims of non-Malay race sustain the similar treatment.
 
.
One of my high school classmates was from Malaysia. He's been to Singapore, and though I haven't, I can believe what he says:

"All the rules and restrictions in Singapore have made all Chinese there assimilated bananas in their own country. Nothing but naieve robots."
Pretty sure, it must be better than Malaysia where apartheid is still practised.
 
.
So what's your problem? Later on Singapore was kicked out of Malaysia because Singapore demanded a fair system where everyone was equal. When Singapore was kicked out, LKY made sure that it wouldn't get forcefully included under its own apartheid laws. Is it even necessary to mention that? He tried and failed but he corrected his mistake. His leadership is the reason why your country is one of the richest today considering how it was 50 years ago. Seems like you hate everything on earth. Maybe you should apply for Mars One and settle down in Mars far away from the Earth's problems.

I would say the socialist spirit of the then fledging PAP saved us from slavery. PAP are made up of leftist young man, and she is a vibrant young party.

Her leaders then will more puritanical and Tungku cannot find little scandals in monies or sex to blackmail PAP to be a race traitor.

Next Tungku made a move which backfire. He wanted to get rid of Kuan Yew by asking TOh Chin Chye, Kuan Yew 2nd in command to rebel.

So Kuan Yew by fighting against Islamo, was actually fighting his own political career.

If Singapore interest is not align with Kuan Yew interest, there is a high chance Kuan Yew will sell us out.

Stop repeating the word 'Islamo'. It was not between Islam and Budhism or whatever religion Singaporean Chinese used to follow, but between the ethnic Malays and Chinese. A simple conflict of races, which is still going on today. It is not only Chinese who are viewed or treated as 2nd class citizen, even the Muslims of non-Malay race sustain the similar treatment.


Malay people like Dayak and Indonesian Christian who never convert to Islam are in friendly terms with Chinese.
 
.
There is a sold out on Singaporean Chinese, in favor of peranakan, white man and India nationals.

Local Malay got the worst hit by Kuan Yew-ism. Local Indian hate Kuan Yew also.

Modi will not be here and declare day of mourning in India, not without good reason. Kuan Yew definitely sold Singapore to India.

PRC also got some perks but I will say India and white man got a larger piece of cake.
So you're issue is purely racial? You think your race was sold short by LKY? Hence your endless postings about IQ etc?

Well, when you take a break from your computer and get out and about you might find that other race people are not really as bad as you think or as weak as you think. LKY took you from an island of coolies and tin miners to a modern society in One generation, at least respect him for that.
 
.
So you're issue is purely racial? You think your race was sold short by LKY? Hence your endless postings about IQ etc?

Well, when you take a break from your computer and get out and about you might find that other race people are not really as bad as you think or as weak as you think. LKY took you from an island of coolies and tin miners to a modern society in One generation, at least respect him for that.

I am presenting history. Go read Kuan Yew memoir and see how he fxxx those UMNO kids and how these UMNO kids played fire.
 
. .
I would say the socialist spirit of the then fledging PAP saved us from slavery. PAP are made up of leftist young man, and she is a vibrant young party.

Her leaders then will more puritanical and Tungku cannot find little scandals in monies or sex to blackmail PAP to be a race traitor.

Next Tungku made a move which backfire. He wanted to get rid of Kuan Yew by asking TOh Chin Chye, Kuan Yew 2nd in command to rebel.

So Kuan Yew by fighting against Islamo, was actually fighting his own political career.

If Singapore interest is not align with Kuan Yew interest, there is a high chance Kuan Yew will sell us out.




Malay people like Dayak and Indonesian Christian who never convert to Islam are in friendly terms with Chinese.
hahaha due I don't think you know much about what he did. Seems like you are a cult follower of morons like Alvin Tan. By the way, if you stayed under socialism, you wouldn't be as successful as what you are today.

As Margaret Thatcher put it:

margaret-thatcher-funny-quotes-6516.jpg


Sure its richer. Better? Who knows. Singapore's a nice country to visit to be sure.
Better because people enjoy high standards of living and equal rights rather than one section living as the "master race" and the others are poor/second class citizens?
 
.
hahaha due I don't think you know much about what he did. Seems like you are a cult follower of morons like Alvin Tan. By the way, if you stayed under socialism, you wouldn't be as successful as what you are today.

As Margaret Thatcher put it:

margaret-thatcher-funny-quotes-6516.jpg

Thatcher is now known as culprit who destroyed Britain. Germany and Nordic country with socialism is laughing all the way.

Right now Kuan Yew and Thatcher style of capitalism is financial capitalism, leaving misery for people, meanwhile shylock laugh like nobody. While UK was a industrial power, she is now relying on peddling London real estate, cooking finanial toxic.

We have much more socialism in the past when Kuan Yew are rein by his old guards. It was his old guards that enable Singapore. When Kuan Yew took over, everyone feel more miserable.
 
.
Thatcher is now known as culprit who destroyed Britain. Germany and Nordic country with socialism is laughing all the way.

Right now Kuan Yew and Thatcher style of capitalism is financial capitalism, leaving misery for people, meanwhile shylock laugh like nobody. While UK was a industrial power, she is now relying on peddling London real estate, cooking finanial toxic.

We have much more socialism in the past when Kuan Yew are rein with his old guards. It was his old guards that enable Singapore. When Kuan Yew took over, everyone feel more miserable.
Sense of eligibility in socialism is something that we should distance ourselves from. When there's eligibility, there is no sense of value so people tend to exploit it and in the end, it destroys productivity and convince people to live off other people's money. The welfare concept of UK is a failure. You can see people claiming benefits which is funded by other hard working individuals' money instead of working. Thatcher had a valuable vision but she failed to do what she wanted to do because of democracy getting in her otherwise she did restore UK's status to an important player in geopolitics. At home she failed to implement some of the important policies.
 
.
Better because people enjoy high standards of living and equal rights rather than one section living as the "master race" and the others are poor?

I don't have a stake in this, because I'm Chinese born and raised. I just find it distasteful that he had such a low opinion of Chinese culture that he basically wiped it out and replaced it with 1950's British culture. The only reason he started promoting Mandarin again was because China was getting strong, not because he thought Chinese had any intrinsic value. it is almost as sad as how South Asian languages are getting replaced by English. Maybe you South Asians want to emulate him, but we don't.

I just want to say - thank god we did not have Lee Kuan Yew in China itself, otherwise today, Chinese culture will be totally extinct and the Taiwanese would actually have a point.
 
.
Sense of eligibility in socialism is something that we should distance ourselves from. When there's eligibility, there is no sense of value so people tend to exploit it and in the end, it destroys productivity and convince people to live off other people's money. The welfare concept of UK is a failure. You can see people claiming benefits which is funded by other hard working individuals' money instead of working. Thatcher had a valuable vision but she failed to do what she wanted to do because of democracy getting in her otherwise she did restore UK's status to an important player in geopolitics. At home she failed to implement some of the important policies.

The socialist state of Germany is the strongest industrial power in Europe.

Socialism is the future. Capitalism is good but it has internal contradiction. You make $100 goods, unless you pay your workers $100, or no one buys your ware, and you got bankrupt soon.

No way to solve this internal contradition other than Schumpeter law.

To implement Schumpeter on Capitalist is perhaps far more difficult that imposing Marxism.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom