Azadkashmir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2012
- Messages
- 11,106
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
at least he got the fact that khawarizmi was Persian right....
how pathetic are Arabs to take credit for Persians/Iranians.... You see this with azerbademjan as well.
If it weren't for the miraculous circumstances of a highly advanced civilization that was in a period of extreme turmoil/weak. while the desert monkeys were at their apex and managed to take over bueracracy/coinage/ governace etc... that propelled them to expand....
If circumstances were slightly differerent, Islam today would be a small cultish religion at best, banished to desert region of arabia. RIP shapur…. if only you were alive in the 7th century~
at least he got the fact that khawarizmi was Persian right....
how pathetic are Arabs to take credit for Persians/Iranians.... You see this with azerbademjan as well.
If it weren't for the miraculous circumstances of a highly advanced civilization that was in a period of extreme turmoil/weak. while the desert monkeys were at their apex and managed to take over bueracracy/coinage/ governace etc... that propelled them to expand....
If circumstances were slightly differerent, Islam today would be a small cultish religion at best, banished to desert region of arabia. RIP shapur…. if only you were alive in the 7th century~
how pathetic are Arabs to take credit for Persians/Iranians.... You see this with azerbademjan as well.
the desert monkeys
Islam today would be a small cultish religion at best
in reality most "Persian" philosopher/scientists were Afghans, back then Afghanistan was part of persian empire
I have seen turks here call maulana rumi a turk, and arab people call Khwarizmi as arab. Next they will claim Razi and avicenna were hendi or arab too......lol
It is understandable why they do this. But he was a Persian from co-terminous Afghanistan.I have seen turks here call maulana rumi a turk, and arab people call Khwarizmi as arab. Next they will claim Razi and avicenna were hendi or arab too......lol
Well even today about 30% of Afghans are Persian, they just call themselves Tajik.in reality most "Persian" philosopher/scientists were Afghans, back then Afghanistan was part of persian empire
No they did identify with their ethnicities as well as being Muslims...but not in the nationalist sense of today.Arabs take credit for them the same reason other Muslims do. Because these people were the product of Islamic civilisation, that spread from Spain to China. Make no mistake, these people identified as Muslim, not as Persian/Arab/Turkic/Sindhi/whatever nationalists.
You do realise that you're related to them, right?
http://realiran.org/national-geographic-iranian-natives-genetic-makeup-is-56-percent-arabian/
No, Allah would still allow Islam to spread like wildfire and crush Ctesiphon and Constantinople one way or another.
It is understandable why they do this. But he was a Persian from co-terminous Afghanistan.
Well even today about 30% of Afghans are Persian, they just call themselves Tajik.
And back then Afghan would only mean Pukhtoon (if it is true that Afghanistan is 5000 years old).
Co-terminous Afghanistan was part of various Persian speaking empires, which is not the same as Persian empire....I mean the Gurkhan e Mughal was Persian speaking...would you call it Persian Empire....
The last true Persian empire was the Sassani which was overtaken by the Muslim Arabs...then they were many Persianized Turkic rulers of co-termious Iran and Afghanistan and even India (true India never really had native Persians unlike the former two), and it was centuries later when a Persian leader probably arose such as Nader Shah to make modern day Persia and then Iran...perhaps the Iranian members could correct me....I suppose some might consider the Safavi as the re-instigators of the Persian Empire but although they were Iranian, they were not ethnically Persian but Azeri....
No they did identify with their ethnicities as well as being Muslims...but not in the nationalist sense of today.
Islam has not come to eradicate ethnicities and cultures but to purify them of the bad leaving the good.
I mean in one sense they were Arab...if you speak Arabic you can become Arab....
at least he got the fact that khawarizmi was Persian right....
how pathetic are Arabs to take credit for Persians/Iranians.... You see this with azerbademjan as well.
If it weren't for the miraculous circumstances of a highly advanced civilization that was in a period of extreme turmoil/weak. while the desert monkeys were at their apex and managed to take over bueracracy/coinage/ governace etc... that propelled them to expand....
If circumstances were slightly differerent, Islam today would be a small cultish religion at best, banished to desert region of arabia. RIP shapur…. if only you were alive in the 7th century~
No they did identify with their ethnicities as well as being Muslims...but not in the nationalist sense of today.
The one's who speak pashto language border your country. They comprise less than 40% of Afghani population.