The Top 10 Armies You Don't Want to Fight.

[RayKalm]

Hypersonic
A hypersonic cruise missile would travel at least 5 times the speed of sound. These are still in the developmental stage.
Examples:
BrahMos II India/ Russia The joint Russia/India venture is in the testing phase.
[edit]Supersonic


Air-Sol Moyenne Portée, a French supersonic cruise missile
These missiles travel faster than the speed of sound, usually using ramjet engines. The range is typically 100–500 km, but can be greater. Guidance systems vary.
Examples
3M-54 Klub Russia "Sizzler" variant is capable of supersonic in terminal stage.
Air-Sol Moyenne Portée France - supersonic stand-off nuclear missile
BrahMos India / Russia (currently the fastest cruise missile in operation anywhere in the world)
C-101 China
C-301 China
C-803 China supersonic terminal stage only
C-805 China
KD-88 China
P-800 Oniks Soviet Union/ Russia
Kh-31 Russia
P-500 Bazalt Soviet Union/ Russia
P-700 Granit Soviet Union/ Russia
P-270 Moskit Soviet Union/ Russia
YJ-91 China
[edit]Long-range subsonic


A United States Air Force AGM-86
The US, USSR, UK, China, Pakistan and India have developed several long-range subsonic cruise missiles. These missiles have a range of over 1,000 kilometres (620 mi) and fly at about 800 kilometres per hour (500 mph).[citation needed] They typically have a launch weight of about 1,500 kilograms (3,300 lb)[citation needed] and can carry either a conventional or a nuclear warhead. Earlier versions of these missiles used inertial navigation; later versions use much more accurate TERCOM and DSMAC systems. Most recent versions can use satellite navigation.
Examples:
AGM-86B United States
AGM-129 ACM United States
BGM-109 Tomahawk United States/ United Kingdom
Nirbhay India (under development)
CJ-10 People's Republic of China
DH-10 People's Republic of China
Babur II Pakistan(in development)
Hyunmoo IIIC South Korea[5]
KH-55 Russia
[edit]Medium-range subsonic


Storm Shadow (UK/France/Italy)
These missiles are about the same size and weight and fly at similar speeds to the above category, but the range is (officially)[citation needed] less than 1,000 km. Guidance systems vary.
Examples:
AGM-158 JASSM United States
Babur Pakistan
KD-63 China
Ra'ad ALCM Pakistan
Storm Shadow/SCALP United Kingdom/ France/ Italy
Taurus KEPD 350 Germany/ Sweden
[edit]Short-range subsonic
These are subsonic missiles which weigh around 500 kilograms (1,102 lb) and have a range of 300 km (190 mi).[citation needed]
Examples:
AVMT-300 Brazil
C-801 China
C-802 China
C-602 China
Delilah missile Israel
Kh-35 Russia
Nasr-1 Iran
Raad Iran
Noor Iran
Qader Iran
Zafar Iran
SOM (missile) [6][7] Turkey
Naval Strike Missile Norway
RBS-15 Sweden
Silkworm China
RGM-84 Harpoon United States
Type 80 Air-to-Ship Missile Japan
Type 88 Surface-to-Ship Missile Japan
Type 90 Ship-to-Ship Missile Japan
Type 91 Air-to-Ship Missile Japan
Type 93 Air-to-Ship Missile Japan

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

How will you eliminate Russia's size advantage? Russia is twice the size of China (roughly). Has islands all over the place, where as China is a sitting target for Russia.

Russia's hearland (European part) is no bigger than that of China, so it is equally as destructible as China.

 

[Sasquatch]

China Modernization started around 1991 ,it's come a very good way current budget is reported to be around 120 billion however the west believes our Budget is Higher then at ranging to 180 billion-200 billion-250 billion, Cannot wait to see the PLA by 2020.

 

[RedBeard]

1) USA
2) Russia
3) China
4) Turkey
5) India
6) UK
7) North Korea
8) France
9) Pakistan
10) South Korea
11) Israel
12) Iran
13) Japan
14) Germany
15) Brazil

 

[RayKalm]

1) USA
2) Russia
3) China
4) Turkey
5) India
6) UK
7) North Korea
8) France
9) Pakistan
10) South Korea
11) Israel
12) Iran
13) Japan
14) Germany
15) Brazil

Woah, woah, woah. 4th is too high, even for Turkey.

1.) USA
2.) Russia
3.) China
4.) India
5.) United Kingdom
6.) France
7.) Turkey
8.) Israel
9.) Pakistan
10.) North Korea
11.) Brazil
12.) South Korea
13.) Japan - Germany
14.) Japan - Germany
15.) Iran
16.) Taiwan
17.) Egypt
18.) Italy
19.) Indonesia
20.) Thailand.

 

[RedBeard]

Woah, woah, woah. 4th is too high, even for Turkey.

1.) USA
2.) Russia
3.) China
4.) India
5.) United Kingdom
6.) France
7.) Turkey
8.) Israel
9.) Pakistan
10.) North Korea
11.) Brazil
12.) South Korea
13.) Japan - Germany
14.) Japan - Germany
15.) Iran
16.) Taiwan
17.) Egypt
18.) Italy
19.) Indonesia
20.) Thailand.

Turkish soldiers are the best.. we don't care about tanks, planes, warships. Most important is spirit and heart of the soldiers.

 

[Holmes]

1) USA
2) Russia
3) China
4) India
5) UK
6) Israel
7) North Korea
8) France
9) Iran
10) Japan

 

[below_freezing]

1) USA
2) Russia
3) China
4) India
5) UK
6) Israel
7) North Korea
8) France
9) Iran
10) Japan

France below Israel and North Korea?!

 

[Alpery]

However, they have very low population density, most of that already low population density lives in Europe and only one (that is 1) railroad connecting Siberia to the rest of Russia.

If we fight a conventional (no nukes) war, then that means we can use a cruise missile to hit maybe 10 critical bridges on the Siberian Railroad, and our forces can roll across the border with almost no opposition and take any airports within a few hundred KM of the border within days.

However, because Russia has a gigantic nuclear arsenal and will do a first strike, that's not going to happen.

Russians cant use their nuc (mass) when you inside Siberia....you can go until Urals if your tanks dont freeze..but you wont want this stuation..
I think no:1 is China in the world....according to man power

 

[Americanpeacebomber]

Seems this always keeps coming
USA
Russia
China
India

 

[Alpery]

Seems this always keeps coming
USA
Russia
China
India

forget the Bharats
they have no veto rigths at UN

 

[Amolthebest]

Why nobody is consisting Vietnam in their list. They have beaten two biggest countries (US and China) in the war.

 

[Rank]

about what well if its related to 65 and 71 then we do know the truth

the objectives of 65 were not meet pakistan lost more land more men more machinery than india hence his words

So by your logic you lost more men more machinery more land as well in 1999 Kargil War - "as your General said who was leading the Kargil Operation"

LOLZ

 

[Kazhugu]

So by your logic you lost more men more machinery more land as well in 1999 Kargil War - "as your General said who was leading the Kargil Operation"

LOLZ

th thing is we achieved our objectives...."chasing the rat *** mujaheddin" back to their homeland.....from india...

while in '65 pakistaan could not achieve its objective..liberation of kashmir..

---------- Post added at 10:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 AM ----------

So by your logic you lost more men more machinery more land as well in 1999 Kargil War - "as your General said who was leading the Kargil Operation"

LOLZ

th thing is we achieved our objectives...."chasing the rat *** mujaheddin" back to their homeland.....from india...

while in '65 pakistaan could not achieve its objective..liberation of kashmir..

 

[below_freezing]

Why nobody is consisting Vietnam in their list. They have beaten two biggest countries (US and China) in the war.

The kill ratios were far too high against them, they were fighting a war on their own land, and they had support from China and Russia the first time, and Russia the 2nd.

We're talking about no foreign aid situations.