What's new

The Reason Why Pakistan Fears India's Nuclear Stockpile Despite Owning More Missile Warheads

.
Only war u finished was 71 and that was due to it's unique geographic isolation the rest of your were inconclusive in one of 48 we took 40% of your attotang and in other as u r giving general statement of finishing wars Chinese took another piece of your attotang :)
Nice finish ;)

yaad rahe 25 crore ummat e muslma hindustan ke shahron me hi rahti hai . khabardar jo musalmano par bomb chalaya .


we never start war . we finish it .



halat bahut sangin hogi ?



aapne jang ka bahut makhsoos naksha khincha hai .bari ghabarahat ho rahi hai .
I was just giving u facts I know Indians r the most ignorant country in the world but u should reduce your ignorance when try to.comment on such serious matter on PDF my child :)
 
.
Nice finish ;)


I was just giving u facts I know Indians r the most ignorant country in the world but u should reduce your ignorance when try to.comment on such serious matter on PDF my child :)
carry on .not your fault .
 
. . .
Indian cities are huge while Pakistani nuke is small .
India has hydrogen bomb and Pakistan got only fission atom bomb.

So Pakistan needs lot more bomb to take them out completely.
The problem is Pakistan can use only handful of nukes say 10 to 20 of it's 140 nukes before it India retaliates 10 to 20 nukes and due to small size Pakistan get wiped out first before it can take out more indian cities in second strike , a capability which Pakistan doesn't posses .

To hurt India as much as india can hurt Pakistan , Pakistan needs thermonuclear bombs and that too in big numbers from sub marines .

Who told you Pakistani nukes are small? What utter rubbish!
Pakistan's plutonium based weapons are tripped with tritium making their explosive power increase hundreds of times over. A few grams can boost weapons close to 500%!

You better look at what the experts say about it!!
Here Geoff Olynyk;

https://www.quora.com/How-lethal-ar...-there-is-a-strong-chance-of-a-nuclear-attack

His Twitter;
twitter https://ca.linkedin.com/in/olynykResearch papers;

His research papers
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=fHxRnzkAAAAJ&hl=en

Company profile
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/olynyk


writes about the power of Pakistan's weapons.



Geoff Olynyk
, Ph.D., Applied Plasma Physics and Fusion Energy, MIT, 2013
Updated Feb 18, 2013 · Author has 218 answers and 1.1m answer views


The short answer, of course, is very lethal, like all nuclear weapons. Read on for more details.

So according to the Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction article on Wikipedia, Pakistan possesses four delivery mechanisms for a nuclear attack in the area:

  • Medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM). Range, 2500 km. Estimated yield 300–500 kt (kilotons of TNT equivalent).
  • Nuclear-tipped Babur cruise missiles. Range, 700 km. Yield - ?
  • Nuclear bombs carried by fighter-bombers. Estimated yield up to 150 kt.
  • Cruise missiles carried by fighter-bombers. Warhead estimated yield 20–25 kt.

The fighter-bombers likely drop 150 kt bombs or launch cruise missiles with 20–25 kt warheads. The most powerful warheads in Pakistan's arsenal are estimated to have a yield 300–500 kt, delivered by the Ghauri-I MRBM:

ghauri-hatf-v-missile-ppi1.jpg

Ghauri medium-range ballistic missiles.

Note that this would be a very similar yield to the U.S.'s most advanced warhead, the 475 kt W88. (Although the Pakistani one is probably much heavier due to the less advanced technology, and thus you can't carry as many of them on a missile.)

As we start discussing the effects, keep in mind the pictures of the destruction in Hiroshima (the Little Boy bomb had a yield of 13 kt), and remember that a 500 kt weapon is nearly 40 times more powerful.

13-blast-damage_1218012i.jpg

Effects of a 13 kt air burst.

They are also apparently working on a sea-launched cruise missile (a naval variant of the Babur) and a smaller nuclear warhead that can be put on Pakistan's Chinese-made C-802 and C-803 anti-ship missiles, but these delivery mechanisms are not operational yet.

Taking the upper end of the estimated range of Pakistani warheads (500 kilotons) is convenient because the U.S. government published a bunch of graphs on the effects of a 500 kt blast in the report Nuclear Attack Environment Handbook (FEMA, August 1990). The graphics below are taken from here, which reproduces the FEMA book.

Here is an overview of the effects of a 500 kt surface burst:

blast1.jpg


There is heavy damage (5 psi overpressure) out to a radius of about 2.2 miles.

If they are smarter about it and detonate it 1.1 miles in the air (see Geoff Olynyk's answer to Why doesn't the blast from a nuke take place on the ground?), the damage radius is larger:

blast4.jpg


There is now heavy damage out to a radius of 3.2 miles. The government also helpfully calculated the winds produced by a 500 kt air burst:

main-qimg-ce7213763bde8f1d96765f1eb91394bf.webp


and a nice graph showing all the other fun effects (eardrums burst! serious glass wounds!) from a 500 kt air burst:

tab3-I.gif


Finally, here are the radii at which you get flash burns from the light (thermal radiation) from a 500 kt air burst, depending on how clear of a day it is:

main-qimg-d598cf5b7b3b575aa23432d046d7f5e0.webp


Okay, that's enough detail. To actually answer your question, the overpressure at which buildings fall and people die immediately is about 20 psi, but it's more likely than not that you'll die at the 5 psi level also, due to flying debris, you getting thrown about, fire, glass, etc. Even if you survive, your eardrums will explode and you'll probably die within a few hours anyway due to the burns.

So for a 500 kt weapon (upper estimate of Pakistani capability), with an air burst, that's a radius of 0.6 miles (1.0 km) for the 20 psi overpressure, or 3.2 miles (5.1 km) for the 5 psi overpressure. Note that's radius from the hypocenter (the point on the ground below where the warhead detonates).

But if you want a better chance of survival, just looking at the graphs above (I obviously have no personal experience with this), you'll want to be more like 6–7 miles (9–11 km) away from the hypocenter.

There is lots more discussion of the effects of a 500 kt airburst at this company trying to sell you a fallout shelter's website:

  • Impact lethality out to just over 4 miles.
  • Impact skull fracture and serious glass wounds out to 5 miles.
  • Impact injuries out to over 6 miles, with 50% probability of 3rd degree burns, if in clear line-of-sight at the instant of initial flash.
  • Skin lacerations from glass fragments out to almost 9 miles, with 50% probability of 1st degree burns, if in clear line-of-sight at instant of initial flash.

They say the "lethal radius" is 2.2 miles, which corresponds to the 10 psi overpressure curve.

You can put these radii on your city using the widget here.
Ground Zero | Carloslabs (Choose the Joe-4 400 kt weapon.)

Finally, I note that for the smaller Pakistani weapons (say, the 20 kt nuclear-tipped airplane-launched cruise missile), the 5- and 20-psi overpressure radii will obviously be smaller; about 35% as large in radius. You can get a sense of the destruction from such a weapon by looking at pictures of Nagasaki (the Fat Man had a yield of 21 kt).

Also, I love how Quora now thinks I'm some sort of expert on nuclear weapons because I've answered a few questions with links to Wikipedia. Every time I answer another one of these nuclear weapon questions on Quora, I'm more and more disgusted at humanity for building so many of them.

main-qimg-8976d6816a921f95b4c76fbcde1f645d
 
Last edited:
.
good thing is ,
according to bangaler mirror
indians are as ignorant as americans :enjoy:
Any doubt look they voted a moron a bigot and a man who clings to power by dividing and weakening his nation into factions and so did you :)
 
.
Any doubt look they voted a moron a bigot and a man who clings to power by dividing and weakening his nation into factions and so did you :)

i am proud of our voting pattern , patriots with 56 inch chest are elected .
 
. . . . .
So 150 Pak nukes/ 50 Indian mega cities = 3 Pak nukes per Indian mega city ;)
Let me be very generous and say that your 1 nuke can completely destroy 100 sq km area. Area of Delhi is 1500 Sq KM (Not including sister cities like gurgaon, noida, faridabad). Area of Mumbai is 600 Sq KM
So you will require 21 bombs to completely destroy just delhi and mumbai
 
.
Let me be very generous and say that your 1 nuke can completely destroy 100 sq km area. Area of Delhi is 1500 Sq KM (Not including sister cities like gurgaon, noida, faridabad). Area of Mumbai is 600 Sq KM
So you will require 21 bombs to completely destroy just delhi and mumbai
Let me be generous enough to call what u r a stupid so it take 21 pak nukes to destroy one Indian city and 10 nukes to destroy whole Pak which is 1/3 the size of India

BTW a

Let me be generous enough to call what u r an ignorunt stupid so it take 21 pak nukes to destroy one Indian city and 10 nukes to destroy whole Pak which is 1/3 the size of India

BTW a
@waz just explained the the power of pak nukes read that and reduce your ignorance :)
 
.
Who told you Pakistani nukes are small? What utter rubbish!
Pakistan's plutonium based weapons are tripped with tritium making their explosive power increase hundreds of times over. A few grams can boost weapons close to 500%!

main-qimg-8976d6816a921f95b4c76fbcde1f645d
Those nukes tested by Pakistan n 1998 were all Uranium based . None of them were plutonium based weapons .

If what u saying is true , then they must be new and untested weapons .
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom