The Reason Why Pakistan Fears India's Nuclear Stockpile Despite Owning More Missile Warheads

[Taimoor Khan]

Indian cities are huge while Pakistani nuke is small .
India has hydrogen bomb and Pakistan got only fission atom bomb.

So Pakistan needs lot more bomb to take them out completely.
The problem is Pakistan can use only handful of nukes say 10 to 20 of it's 140 nukes before it India retaliates 10 to 20 nukes and due to small size Pakistan get wiped out first before it can take out more indian cities in second strike , a capability which Pakistan doesn't posses .

To hurt India as much as india can hurt Pakistan , Pakistan needs thermonuclear bombs and that too in big numbers from sub marines .

Pakistani nukes small? LOL. Let me give you a hint, that last Hydrogen bomb test by fat Kim, which shook the world, reports are suggesting it was infact a Pakistani specimen.

And since when India posses Hydrogen bomb with the capacity of Megaton and more yield? India did try it back in 98 but it fizzled out, hence a very low overall yield in last Indian tests of 98.

And the FACT that Pakistani is now focusing on sub-kilo ton tactical battlefield nukes to wipe out Indian armed forces quickly and efficiently, that in it self a big give away that Pakistan has already got enough in its arsenal of what we call, city busting nukes.

 

[Mrc]

Pakistan has a handful of cities and for that India does not really need more than 10 to 15 Nuclear Weapons. Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi are Pakistan's only economic hubs. If you take them out there will be no Pakistan left

All talk no substance...

Why don't you try it

By the way the trash article from a trash source is self contradictory...

If u only need 15 bombs .... than actually pakistan has absolutely no reason to fear indian large stockpile

 

[xyxmt]

India is nothing without Mumbai and New Delhi, Pakistan only need to take those two cities out

 

[Rahil khan]

The Reason Why Pakistan Fears India's Nuclear Stockpile Despite Owning More Missile Warheads
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
By: MensXP

Source Link: CLICK HERE

• 
• 
• 

India has a healthy stockpile of nuclear weapons and despite Pakistan's rapid pace of developing new nuclear warheads, India is fairly confident of its war capabilities. Currently, India owns 130-140 nuclear warheads as compared to Pakistan's 140-150, according to the latest assessment of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

"India and Pakistan are both expanding their nuclear weapon stockpiles as well as developing new land, sea and air-based missile delivery systems. China continues to modernize its nuclear weapon delivery systems and is slowly increasing the size of its nuclear arsenal," said the latest SIPRI report.

While the twin threat of China and Pakistan cannot be taken lightly, India has built a credible nuclear deterrent which is capable of inflicting heavy damage in a war-like situation.

"The number of warheads does not really matter. With a declared no-first use (NFU) nuclear policy, India is keen to ensure survivability and credibility of our assets and NC3 (nuclear command, control, and communication) systems for assured second-strike capabilities…We have achieved this to a large extent," a source told TOI.

"For India, nuclear weapons are not war-fighting weapons, but credible minimum deterrence, with the certainty of massive retaliation against adversaries," the source further explained.

Pakistan has a handful of cities and for that India does not really need more than 10 to 15 Nuclear Weapons. Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi are Pakistan's only economic hubs. If you take them out there will be no Pakistan left. India on the other hand has more than 4,000 cities and towns with a distributed population. This is the main reason why Pakistan even with a fewer nukes on the Indian side fears a retaliation with guaranteed extermination.

India recently started the process of inducting the country's first intercontinental ballistic missile (Agni-V) with a range of over 5,000 km almost reaching every nook and corner of China.

While there has been a concerted effort from both India and China to grow economically and settle the differences through talks, India's nuclear capabilities do have a key role to play when it comes to foiling China's expansionist plans.
http://www.defencenews.in/article/T...e-Despite-Owning-More-Missile-Warheads-558952

So you are considering all 4000 cities of India as economic hub ? Amazing isn't it. Delhi, Bangalore, Mumbai, Kolkata, Hyderabad , Chennai, Pune, Ahmedabad...? ? Where would India stand after extermination of these cities ? Trust me we have enough sources to wipe these all out completely. So would be the end of humanity in this region...not to mention the devastating effect on environment and agriculture across the globe. I read somewhere that earth would lost 40% of its crop production capacity in case of nuclear war between India & Paksitan. So where would the world stand than ? Such a childish posts ...talking about country of two hundred ten million people exterminated without thinking the consequences. I am not buying this nonsense at all.

 

[Daghalodi]

Another feel good article for supapowa 2012!!

Bharatis can sleep better now

 

[AyanRay]

Read my comments in post #2


How you are proposing India to survive as a viable state after losing the likes of Bombay, Delhi, Calcutta, Madras etc, in Pakistani nuke strikes?

If the argument is about population dispersion, majority of Pakistanis live in rural areas.

If I am not wrong, your one city Karachi accounts for 10% of the population. and yes don't forget that Indian cities are protected by S-300, PAD, AAD and soon S-400 will join. Even in case some of your missiles manage to go through, there won't be a third strike option for you guys and I don't think you will be able to hit all 4 megacities of India on the first go.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

nd yes don't forget that Indian cities are protected by S-300, PAD, AAD

i heard there are is a Div of brahmastra deployed too outside delhi to kill Aliens
talking about thing that exists not fictional AAD PAD

 

[AyanRay]

i heard there are is a Div of brahmastra deployed too outside delhi to kill Aliens
talking about thing that exists not fictional AAD PAD

I am sorry, our Defence ministry forgot to inform you personally about the deployment of these missile defence systems. But in any case over half a dozen successful tests, order of dozens of high powered radar systems should have been good enough hint for you about the status of the missiles.

 

[Reichsmarschall]

I am sorry, our Defence ministry forgot to inform you personally about the deployment of these missile defence systems. But in any case over half a dozen successful tests, order of dozens of high powered radar systems should have been good enough hint for you about the status of the missiles.

nor AAD neither PAD are operational

 

[Taimoor Khan]

If I am not wrong, your one city Karachi accounts for 10% of the population. and yes don't forget that Indian cities are protected by S-300, PAD, AAD and soon S-400 will join. Even in case some of your missiles manage to go through, there won't be a third strike option for you guys and I don't think you will be able to hit all 4 megacities of India on the first go.

You may have to empty half of your warheads just to destroy Karachi considering the size of the metropolis and low yield of your warheads. By in large, most of our population lives in Rural areas. But that is not the argument. Rural population doesn't contribute much with sustaining the functioning of the state, as state. This is valid for India as well. Despite with 1 billion population, all Pakistan needs to do is to take out all Major Indian cities, which are not many in numbers, which in turn will collapse the statehood and functioning of India. Now you may argue that armed forces may keep Indian state intact , and for that we are developing the tactical nukes which exclusively will be used against Indian forces.

Pakistan has the capability to nuke Indian cities from its land, air and Sea based assets, so the question of first, second or third strike doesn't arise.

 

[Dalit]

LOL sh!tty Indian source.

 

[Sal12]

Indian cities are huge while Pakistani nuke is small .
India has hydrogen bomb and Pakistan got only fission atom bomb.

So Pakistan needs lot more bomb to take them out completely.
The problem is Pakistan can use only handful of nukes say 10 to 20 of it's 140 nukes before it India retaliates 10 to 20 nukes and due to small size Pakistan get wiped out first before it can take out more indian cities in second strike , a capability which Pakistan doesn't posses .

To hurt India as much as india can hurt Pakistan , Pakistan needs thermonuclear bombs and that too in big numbers from sub marines .

What if Pak fires all of its nuclear warheads at the same time.

 

[Trisonics]

What if Pak fires all of its nuclear warheads at the same time.

What if India abandons it's no-first-use policy? Even before you know, you are gone and we survive.

 

[Ali Tariq]

What if India abandons it's no-first-use policy? Even before you know, you are gone and we survive.

 

[Trango Towers]

@dani191 're post #6
Listen jew boy there won't be an Israel eithet ....remember what Musharraf told America. Hit us and we will hit the country that runs America. We are not Arab and we don't chuck stones .
You jews talk big but the Templars spit roasted your kids at the gates of Jerusalem and you did nothing.
The pharaohs drove you from their lands and you did nothing and
The Germans gassed you and you did nothing.
Now you are brave against a people who only have stones.