What's new

The Reality of US Aid to Pakistan

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
$10bn US aid to Pakistan termed a ‘myth’

By Sabihuddin Ghausi

KARACHI, Feb 11: Special Secretary to Finance Dr Ashfaq Ahmad Khan has termed the generally held belief that the US provided $10 billion assistance to Pakistan after 9/11 a ‘myth’ which has nothing to do with reality.

Speaking at a seminar on “mid-term review of 2007-08 economic performance” on Monday, organised by the Management Association of Pakistan (MAP), the special secretary stated that the actual inflow from the US was $9.3 billion till December 2007. “Of this, the bulk amount of $5 billion is actually reimbursement of the expenditure incurred by the government on services given to the US,’’ he said and wondered as to how a reimbursement can be called “assistance’’ and how it can be misappropriated in Pakistan.

“The reimbursement is done only after the defence attaché in the US embassy in Pakistan closely scrutinises the expenditure vouchers of the services which are again checked by the defence authorities in Washington,’’ he said.

In 2003 when President Pervez Musharraf met President George W Bush at the Camp David, the US had agreed to offer an assistance of three billion dollars over a period of five years by providing 600 million dollars a year. Of this, 300 million dollars are for military purposes and 300 million dollars as economic assistance.

The military assistance, he explained, is in the form of hardware and equipment and the government got 297 million dollars each year during the last three years. About the economic assistance, he said the bulk amount was being spent by the USAID in which Pakistan government had no control.

Dr Ashfaq’s complaint was that the US media did not carry details of the so-called US assistance despite being given all briefings and facts about it by him.

He also stated that the government paid Rs160 billion interest money and on encashment of Defence Saving Certificates at the rate of 18 per cent on maturity after 10 years, and was paying Rs100 billion this year also.

He recalled that Mr Shahid Javed Burki, the then caretaker finance minister, had raised the interest rate on Defence Saving Certificates from 16 to 18 per cent which led to a massive flow of term deposits in banks.

Responding to a criticism that the government neither visualised nor planned increase in the electricity generation to meet the rising demand on achieving a certain level of economic growth, Dr Ashfaq surprised everyone by disclosing that there was a power surplus of 3,000 to 4,000 MW in the country during 2002 and 2003.

“We anticipated electricity consumption growth at three per cent a year and found that the installed capacity was sufficient till year 2010,’’ he informed. Even at six per cent growth in the electricity consumption, there was enough power generation capacity to last till 2007 or 2008.

But because of rapid economic growth at seven per cent in the last five years, the electricity consumption grew at 10 per cent a year and hence the problem, he said.

In 2001, he said the government was exploring to export electricity to India because it had excess capacity and the government was forced to pay at least 60 per cent of capacity to the private power operators no matter the electricity was produced or not.

“It was the attack on the Indian parliament in 2001 that brought such negotiations to an abrupt halt,’’ he reminded.

He asked the participants how many of them would have responded to invest in an electricity generation project in Pakistan when there was actually a surplus and an idle capacity.

Referring to the observations that expanding current account deficit was putting a tremendous strain on the exchange value of Pakistani rupee which was being quoted at Rs62.8 against dollar, the special secretary said the rupee maintained a Rs60 parity with dollar for so long that many people thought it is permanent and fixed.

“It is now moving within two to 2.5 per cent band,’’ he said.

He was asked the justification of raising $500 million at the rate of six per cent from the international capital market by way of floating bonds when there were $15 billion foreign exchange reserves.

“Ask this question to China that raised a billion dollars through bond floatation while having foreign exchange reserves of 1.5 trillion dollars,’’ he quipped.

“We got a good rating for bonds in May 2007 when there was turmoil in the country,’’ he said, but blamed media reports for spoiling Pakistan’s image that worsened country’s international rating.

The special secretary refused to answer a question when asked to comment as to how the recently announced monetary policy of the State Bank of Pakistan would have an impact on growth.

“There is a big China wall between the finance ministry and the State Bank,’’ he said.

He refused to be dragged into a discussion when told that there was a fiscal and monetary coordination board. “Yes there is,’’ he acknowledged, but did not say more.

Mr Aftab Ahmed Khan, a retired bureaucrat who was finance secretary, also endorsed tight monetary stance on the plea that last year too the monetary expansion was 19 per cent against a target of 13.5 per cent.

While he acknowledged the growth in economy, he said inflation was bringing troubles to consumers.

$10bn US aid to Pakistan termed a ‘myth’ -DAWN - Business; February 12, 2008
 
.
Hassan rejects reports regarding $10bn US aid

By Tanveer Ahmed

KARACHI: Pakistan has received $9.3 billion from United States in the last six and half years and over fifty percent of this was reimbursement of amount, spent on providing services to coalition forces fighting in Afghanistan, Dr Ashfaq Hassan, Special Secretary Ministry of Finance revealed here on Monday.

Talking to newsmen on the sidelines of a seminar, Dr Ashfaq said that reimbursement of amount could not be called assistance as being perceived generally in our country that we received over 10 billion dollar from US in assistance for joining the war against terror.

Some portion of the amount, as part of economic assistance is being spent directly by USAID in the country and Government of Pakistan did not have any role in receiving or spending this amount, he said.

Responding general notions about receiving over $10 billion assistance from USA, Secretary termed it misperceived and questioned the health of these reports. “Tell me: Is it a myth or reality?” he contended and blamed the national media for reporting irresponsibly about state of economy.

Giving the details of the assistance received from USA, he said that apart from reimbursed of $5 billion during last six and half years, country received the economic and military assistance under agreement which USA and Pakistan reached during President Pervez Musharraf’s visit in 2003 that envisaged $3 billion financial assistance for five years.

According to this agreement, Pakistan was to receive $600 million per annum with $300 million for military purposes and rest as economic assistance. So far, country received slightly above $1 billion in military assistance during the period under review, however during the current financial year, not a single penny has been given by USA on this head.

While in economic assistance, country received $600 million till December 2007 as $300 million installment per annum. Another $300 million was spent directly by USAID, Dr Hassan stated.

He, however said $200 million, being received directly by government from USA would too be spent by USAID in future so we would be receiving nothing in the economic assistance in the coming days under Camp David agreement.

In short, Dr Ashfaq said that we have received net cash of slightly $1.6 billion in the last six and half years contrary to general perception that country received over $ 10 billion in the last six & half years from USA.

Earlier speaking at the seminar, organised by Management Association of Pakistan (MAP) Dr Hassan focused on the economic achievement and challenges of the country and declared that economic landscape of the country is different what used to be in the past.

He said that successful reforms have given momentum to strong GDP growth, rising investment, modest inflation and higher forex reserves. “Strong foundation is in place for high levels of sustained economic growth”, he added.

About the key challenges to economy, he listed rising international oil prices as a serious threat to national economy and said that it has three-pronged affects. First freesing the domestic oil prices have exerted pressures on budget, secondly rising import oil bill is imbalacing the current account deficit.

Also he described sustaining growth momentum, coping with high energy cost, strengthening physical and human infrastructure, creating employment opportunities, reduction of poverty further, enhancing fiscal efforts and reducing saving-investment gap as future challenges to economy.

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
 
.
Hassan rejects reports regarding $10bn US aid

By Tanveer Ahmed

KARACHI: Pakistan has received $9.3 billion from United States in the last six and half years and over fifty percent of this was reimbursement of amount, spent on providing services to coalition forces fighting in Afghanistan, Dr Ashfaq Hassan, Special Secretary Ministry of Finance revealed here on Monday.

Talking to newsmen on the sidelines of a seminar, Dr Ashfaq said that reimbursement of amount could not be called assistance as being perceived generally in our country that we received over 10 billion dollar from US in assistance for joining the war against terror.

Some portion of the amount, as part of economic assistance is being spent directly by USAID in the country and Government of Pakistan did not have any role in receiving or spending this amount, he said.

Responding general notions about receiving over $10 billion assistance from USA, Secretary termed it misperceived and questioned the health of these reports. “Tell me: Is it a myth or reality?” he contended and blamed the national media for reporting irresponsibly about state of economy.

Giving the details of the assistance received from USA, he said that apart from reimbursed of $5 billion during last six and half years, country received the economic and military assistance under agreement which USA and Pakistan reached during President Pervez Musharraf’s visit in 2003 that envisaged $3 billion financial assistance for five years.

According to this agreement, Pakistan was to receive $600 million per annum with $300 million for military purposes and rest as economic assistance. So far, country received slightly above $1 billion in military assistance during the period under review, however during the current financial year, not a single penny has been given by USA on this head.

While in economic assistance, country received $600 million till December 2007 as $300 million installment per annum. Another $300 million was spent directly by USAID, Dr Hassan stated.

He, however said $200 million, being received directly by government from USA would too be spent by USAID in future so we would be receiving nothing in the economic assistance in the coming days under Camp David agreement.

In short, Dr Ashfaq said that we have received net cash of slightly $1.6 billion in the last six and half years contrary to general perception that country received over $ 10 billion in the last six & half years from USA.

Earlier speaking at the seminar, organised by Management Association of Pakistan (MAP) Dr Hassan focused on the economic achievement and challenges of the country and declared that economic landscape of the country is different what used to be in the past.

He said that successful reforms have given momentum to strong GDP growth, rising investment, modest inflation and higher forex reserves. “Strong foundation is in place for high levels of sustained economic growth”, he added.

About the key challenges to economy, he listed rising international oil prices as a serious threat to national economy and said that it has three-pronged affects. First freesing the domestic oil prices have exerted pressures on budget, secondly rising import oil bill is imbalacing the current account deficit.

Also he described sustaining growth momentum, coping with high energy cost, strengthening physical and human infrastructure, creating employment opportunities, reduction of poverty further, enhancing fiscal efforts and reducing saving-investment gap as future challenges to economy.

Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan

crystal clear - this was my perception also. the rest of the military purchases like F-16s, AIM-120Cs, AIM-9Ms etc are direct FMS. (Pak Money). even with the EDA contracts, all upgrades have to be paid by Pak money or adjusted against the yearly US$ 300 mill military assistance packages.
 
.
I found the breakdown of the actual military assistance (military aid) to Pakistan by the US, disregarding expenditures, and it amounts to a little over 1.8 billion. The whole "misused aid funds meant for terrorism" is a canard - the headline sells, and feeds into the anti-Pakistan sentiment.
 
.
A comprehensive breakdown of the US aid to Pakistan 2001 through 2008

Middle East Desk : Pakistan

Total military aid 2002 to 2008 (inclusive): 1801.185 million Dollars

This breakdown does not include the approx. 5.5 billion provided as expense reimbursements under the Coalition Support Fund (CSF).
 
. . .
Posted on July 27, 2009 by Moin Ansari

There are many misconceptions about Pakistan’s economy which have been either created deliberately or the outcomes of ignorance. One of the misconceptions is about $10 billion “assistance” from the United States. Critiques within and outside Pakistan have always asked as to what happened to the $10 billion US assistance. Only recently my good friend Dr Meekal Aziz Ahmed stated: “No one knows where the $10 billion went.” The purpose of this article is to provide some details of $10 billion assistance which Pakistan received from the United States over the last eight years. This is the first time that the readers would know about the details of the $10 billion assistance.

It goes without saying that the United States is and has been one of the major development partners of Pakistan. The Unites States is the largest (23.5 percent, or $4 billion) market of Pakistani products; the single largest source of workers’ remittances (22 percent–$1.8 billion) and foreign private investment (34 percent–$1.7 billion). The US played a pivotal role in encouraging the IMF and the World Bank to bail out Pakistan from a sheer default in external payment obligations; and played an equally dominant role in arranging the donors’ meeting in Tokyo where they pledged to provide $5.28 billion in economic assistance to Pakistan over the next two years. The economic and financial support by the Unites States to Pakistan is highly commendable.

Let me turn to the subject matter. The total economic assistance provided by the United States since 2001-02 and until November 2008 (the last period I have), that is, during the last seven-and-a0half years, amounted to $10,768 million. Of which $6,062 million (56.3 percent) is the reimbursement of expenditures that Pakistan has incurred against the war on terror. Since the war on terror is being fought on daily basis the expenditures are also incurred on daily basis. At the end of the month the bill is prepared by the Joint Staff Headquarters and shared with the representatives of the US government in Islamabad. After detailed scrutiny of all the expenditures, the bill is then forwarded to the headquarters of the US Central Command and after its approval goes to the Department of Defence for payments. The payment is usually received by Pakistan after a lapse of, on average, six months. Since Pakistan borrows money from domestic sources to finance war on terror expenditure and the reimbursement is made after six months, the interest cost of the borrowing is borne by the government. The interest cost has never been part of reimbursement. Can we treat reimbursement as economic assistance? The answer is certainly no. The over 56 percent of the $10.768 billion is not economic assistance. It is the government of Pakistan’s own money which has been reimbursed.

Once we take care of the reimbursement part, the remaining $4,706 billion US assistance needs to be explained. The United States has written off $1,495 million of its debt to Pakistan in 2002-03 ($1,000 million) and 2004-05 ($495 million), thus leaving $3,211 million to be explained. Pakistan has received grants from the US over the last seven-and-a-half years totalling $487 million for the purchase of wheat and soybean oil, governance, economic growth, education and health, and for earthquake relief, law enforcement and population planning. These grants ranged from $0.7 million (2002-03) to $198 million (2006-07). After grants are taken care of, the amount left to be explained is $2,724 million.

When former president Pervez Musharraf visited Camp David in June 2003, then-president George Bush agreed to provide $3 billion economic assistance spreading over five years. This assistance was equally divided into economic and military assistance. In other words, Pakistan was to receive $600 million annually with $300 million as budgetary support and the remaining $300 million as military assistance. Pakistan received military assistance in cash after adjusting the purchase of any equipment from the United States. The total military assistance received by Pakistan in cash over the seven-and-a-half years (that include military assistance under Camp David) amounted to $1,514 million. If we adjust the total military assistance the remaining amount to be explained reduced to $1,210 million.

Under the Camp David agreement Pakistan was to receive $300 million’s budgetary support per annum. Pakistan started receiving this money from 2004-05 to 2006-07 at the rate of $200 million per annum and the remaining $100 million was spent on various social-sector projects by USAID in Pakistan directly. Therefore, Pakistan received $600 million in budgetary support during three years period. During the remaining two years (2007-08 and 2008-09) the entire $300 million was spent directly by USAID on social-sector projects identified by the government. In other words, Pakistan did not receive any budgetary support directly under the Camp David agreement in the remaining two years. Altogether, Pakistan has received $1,200 million under budgetary support over the seven-and-a-half years (It received a one-time $600 million budgetary support in 2001-02–immediately after 9/11), thus leaving only $10 million to be explained. Pakistan received the small loan of $10 million in 2002-03.

This completes the total breakdown of $10.786 billion US assistance from 2001-02 to November 2008. In actual terms, Pakistan received $4706 million financial assistance from the United States during the period. If we adjust the amount of debt write off ($1495 million) the total cash that Pakistan received amounted to $3211 million over seven and a half years.

I am confident that at least one misconception on Pakistan’s economy will be cleared after this write-up. My good friend Dr Meekal Aziz Ahmed will at least not be asking the same question again. It is my endeavour to clear up some of the misconceptions about Pakistan’s economy through this newspaper going forward. Ten billion dollar question, Tuesday, July 28, 2009, Dr Ashfaque H Khan. The writer is dean and professor at the NUST Business School, Islamabad. Email: ahkhan@nims.edu.pk
 
.
Pakistan puzzled over US envoy’s $3bn aid claim


Web posted at: 9/18/2009 9:59:29
Source ::: Internews


ISLAMABAD: US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne Patterson’s claim about giving $3bn assistance to the government of President Asif Zardari has surprised its top economic managers, who yesterday said they were clueless about the figure of $3bn floated by the US envoy.

A senior functionary of the finance ministry requesting anonymity said Pakistan received $1bn during the last one-and-a half-year out of which a major chunk of $600m alone was actually in lieu of reimbursement of military bill. The military bill was provided against services rendered by Pakistan Army to fight against militants in tribal areas, which was spent by Pakistan from borrowed money. The US is said to have reimbursed it without paying interest on it, paving the way for plunging budgetary side into a more stressful situation.

“Out of total $970m funding, a major chunk of $550m to $600m was in shape of Coalition Support Fund (CSF) as it was the money which was spent by Pakistan on military’s movement and it took several months for clearance from the US authorities,” said the official.

The US provided $497m in the form of CSF to Pakistan during May 2009. Earlier the US provided around $100m on the same head a couple of months ago, that is, at the end of last financial year.

Around $300m were provided through USAID during the last financial year. Recently US authorities provided over $100m for Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) of Malakand Division.

“The US ambassador should provide details of $3bn assistance given to Pakistan during the last one-and-a-half year,” the official suggested.

Official sources pointed out that Pakistan was bearing the borrowing cost owing to delays in payments from US related to CSF against total bilateral assistance of $4.3bn, Islamabad has so far received around $297m to 2007-08 in the form of Foreign Military Grants (FMG).

There are around service charges being cut down by USA authorities to the tune of $3m every year. The total amount in shape of FMG received by Pakistan was around $1.3bn till 2007-08.
The Peninsula On-line: Qatar's leading English Daily
 
.
EDITORIAL: Where did the funds go?

As the Obama Administration focuses more on the social sectors of the Pakistani economy and separates its aid to Pakistan under the Kerry-Lugar Bill from assistance to the Pakistan Army, new information about how the old US funds were utilised by the Musharraf regime has come to light. The revelation is that the army was not given all the aid meant for increasing its capacity to fight terrorism, but that most of it was diverted by the Musharraf regime to prop up the civilian government.

A couple of retired generals have decided to speak out. General Mahmud Durrani (Retd), who was Pakistan’s ambassador to the US under General Musharraf, says: “It went to things like subsidies, which is why everything looked hunky-dory. The military was financing the war on terror out of its own budget.” And how was this made possible? By the fact that General Musharraf was both army chief and de facto “ruling” president of Pakistan.

According to a report, the additional shocking fact is that some sections of the army, faced with the terrorism of the Taliban, received nothing till 2007, the year when Musharraf’s era began to crumble under pressure from the mistakes the general-president made. In these lean years for the army, “helicopters critical to the battle were not available; the limited night-vision equipment was taken away every three months and returned three weeks later; and old equipment fell out of repair and training was lacking.”

There have been rumours about money getting “siphoned off” on Musharraf’s watch. Some US circles thought Pakistan’s military was more obsessed with India and spent what it got not on the war against domestic terrorism, but on its state of preparedness against India. But if, between 2002 and 2008, only $500 million of the $6.6 billion aid actually made it to the Pakistani military, what kind of defence against India was Pakistan able to secretly mount? On the other hand, the PPP leader President Asif Ali Zardari has been talking of the “misuse” of nearly $10 billion in American aid.

Pakistan doesn’t make public its defence budget. So one cannot track what happens to the money that goes into it. Such sectors as intelligence are kept away from public scrutiny although most of what the spooks do affects the civil sector and the economy. We know that General Musharraf “saved” the army some money by inducting a large number of serving officers into civilian jobs. Pakistan already pays its army’s pensions from the civilian budget, but the charge that wasteful subsidies were paid out of the money meant for the army needs investigation. The “circular” debt that General Musharraf’s regime left behind indicates how reckless his government was with the economy he never tired of discussing.

The Americans were willing to fund the Pakistan Army because in comparison with their own troops it was cheap. By 2008, the US paid Pakistan $8.6 billion for the military, and more than $12 billion in all. The army would send in the bills and the US would pay, barring some cases when delays took place till lack of trust began to prevail and the bills remained pending.

General Mahmud Durrani, whose thesis is that Pakistan has disadvantaged itself politically and economically by pursuing India-centric strategies, says money went into buying equipment better suited to fighting India in Afghanistan than to fighting terrorists. It bought armour-piercing TOW missiles, sophisticated surveillance equipment, air-to-air missiles, maritime patrol aircraft, anti-ship missiles and F-16 fighter aircraft. As a result, in 2007, Pakistan had only one working helicopter for use in FATA!

Pakistan was the largest recipient of US assistance under General Musharraf. It is about to receive even more of it under the Kerry-Lugar Bill. Because of what has happened in the past, there is a lack of trust between the donor and the recipient. Also, those who want to fight terrorism in Pakistan without American help — they actually believe Pakistan doesn’t need to fight terrorism — want the American assistance rejected. Until an inquiry is held — and the time for that will come later — we will not know what actually happened. Now is the time to back the army and do whatever it takes to increase its capacity to fight the terrorists.

http://www.thedailytimes.com.pk
 
.
No doubt those funds went to Chak Shehzad.........

And most certainly most of them went to foreign accounts.

KIT Out
 
.
No doubt those funds went to Chak Shehzad.........

And most certainly most of them went to foreign accounts.

KIT Out

CND ---> pls read the article again - gen. durrani has said this money (CSF) went to prop-up the economy and all the subsidies the govt doles out (gas, elec,utility stores etc)
yes indeed some funds do get siphoned off but what is the extent - no body (except zardari) is claiming that gen.musharraf siphoned off millions!
 
.
CND ---> pls read the article again - gen. durrani has said this money (CSF) went to prop-up the economy and all the subsidies the govt doles out (gas, elec,utility stores etc)
yes indeed some funds do get siphoned off but what is the extent - no body (except zardari) is claiming that gen.musharraf siphoned off millions!

I was watching an interview of Musharaff of many he permited these days when he was asked that was all the funds given to him, as head to state, were justified? Were they were utilized for what they were given? He openly answered No and added that we used "some" of it to build our defences since we can not risk our defence. Good, I would say very good. For what US did to us after Russian invasion on Afghans it was a correct decision. But many reviewers say that Musharaff also did not sincerely did so. Consequently, the rightly accuse him of using funds for his own interests rather than the interest of Pakistan.

Just pointing in that direction FM17

And I am sure you must know that why was Gen. Durrani was kicked out of Security Council of Pakistan???

Correct me if I am wrong.

KIT Over
 
.
I was watching an interview of Musharaff of many he permited these days when he was asked that was all the funds given to him, as head to state, were justified? Were they were utilized for what they were given? He openly answered No and added that we used "some" of it to build our defences since we can not risk our defence. Good, I would say very good. For what US did to us after Russian invasion on Afghans it was a correct decision. But many reviewers say that Musharaff also did not sincerely did so. Consequently, the rightly accuse him of using funds for his own interests rather than the interest of Pakistan.

Just pointing in that direction FM17

And I am sure you must know that why was Gen. Durrani was kicked out of Security Council of Pakistan???

Correct me if I am wrong.

KIT Over

i woudnt dare!!!
 
.
one should know that world personalities like the late BB & Mushy who are in high-demand for the lucarative US/UK lecture tours get anywhere from US$ 40-60,000 per nite can really build up your off-shore accounts!

just a thought!

1 lecture = 40,000 x 83 = Rs, 3.3 mill !!!
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom