Nike
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 13,867
- Reaction score
- 24
- Country
- Location
please send a check to PN
maybe you can go to Beijing, and trying to get some 054A from PRC with long term and soft loan scheme
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
please send a check to PN
Extremely close perhaps aerodynamically.Lets take a close look at the details since u claim i'm not aware of the 'details' of whats being discussed here.And you aren't the only ones who will use awacs.
See how they match up.
MANUEVREBILITY and PERFORMANCE-
The MOST important parameter of this attribute is THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO-
Mig-29k-1.09
Jf-17-.82
Clearly latter is completely outmatched.TW ratio under 1 is not ideal.
2nd most important parameter-
WING LOADING-
Assuming both sides carrying Air to air weaponry[as is norm for CAP fighter protecting carriers and escorting jf-17s of the strike package which would amount to around 3.5 tonnes.By empty weight plus air to air weaponry divided by wing area]
Jf-17 - 371 kg/m^2
MIG-29K -390 kg/m^2
Here due to its lighter weight and single engine jf-17 gets advantage.
Other important parameters-
RATE OF CLIMB-
Jf-17 -175m/s
Mig-29k - 330m/s
Large difference in favour of mig-29k here.
G-limit-
Jf-17-8-8.5 G
Mig-29K- 9.5G
ANGLE OF ATTACK-
Mig-29 has traditionally had awesome angle of attack-
Max 45 degrees.
F-16 has around 30 degrees.
I am guessing mig-29 has large advantage over jf-17 here.Feel free to prove me wrong.
In other parameters of performance-
Service ceiling
Mig-29k-57,400 ft
jf-17-55,500 ft
More or less equal.
Speed-
Jf-17-Max MACH 1.6
Mig-29K -Max Mach 2.2
Solid advantage again for mig-29k.
Use of composites-jf-17- none.
Mig-29K-15%
As seen above Mig-29k almost totally outperforms jf-17 in manuevreability and performance.
NEXT-
AVIONICS-
Both fighters have EW suite and radar warning recievers,countermeasures,Digital FBW,HUD [heads up display] and MFD[multi functional display],HMS.
Key parameters-
RADAR-
JF-17-
KJ-7-5m^2 target at 105 kms.Can track 10 targets in BVR mode and engage 2.Can pick up naval targets only at 135 kms.
Mig-29K-
ZHUK-ME-5m^2 target at 120 kms.Can track 10 and engage 4 simultaneously.Can pick up naval targets at 300kms.
Again solid advantage for mig-29k.
IRST tracker-
Mig-29k-yes
jf-17-no
Another clear advantage of mig-29k.
3.ARMAMENT.
9 HARDPOINTS for mig-29k.
7 hardpoints for jf-17.
jf-17.Can carry 3000kg payload.
Mig-29kCan carry 5500 kg payload.
IMPORTANTLY,
Mig-29k can use R-73 ARCHER/HMS combo with high off boresight capability.
Something the AIM-9L or chinese WVR aams are unable to match.
This would give DECISIVE advantage in close combat to mig-29k.THis was found on luftwaffe mig-29s and thats why all western nations built high off boresight WVRs- example-pythn 4/5 for israel,Aim-9X for usa,IRIS-T germany.
Another fact-
Jf-17 is equipped with a single type of BVR-
PL-12/SD-10.An ACTIVE RADAR HOMING weapon.Range 70km-100kms.
Mig-29k-
Can use BVR missiles with 3 different types of guidance,much more difficult for countermeasures to defeat.
SEMI ACTIVE RADAR HOMING-
R-27R alamo-60-80 KM
R-27ER-Max range 130 km.
PASSIVE INFRA RED HOMING-
R-27T-70 kms
R-27ET-130 kms
ACTIVE RADAR HOMING-
R-77/RVV-AE -80 kms.
Thus in all 3 parameters of performance and manuevreability,armament and avionics MIg-29k holds solid advantage.
Therefore the chances of a jf-17 strike package actually threatening carrier after getting through mig-29k umbrella are nearly non existent.
Why using old parameter for JF -17 and new for your Fav Mig Hypocrate
And what are the new parameters,do tell?
Kindly look in JF-17 info pool. and update your knowledge. thanks
Sorry but nothing is yet clear not even the displacement of F-22P. Navy is keeping secret as some say F-22P is 2500 tons and some say 3400 tons. And I think there would a possibility that US might going to get back the OHP or may be give 7 more OHPs with upgrades to PN.
Also PN is looking to be interested in have a 2100 tons corvette along with building 8 for FAC Azmat class. INSHA ALLAH this year it might going to start up again.
A nice option for PN, PAF and even PAA(instead of Bell_206 and 412):
Kamov Ka-60 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Even possible that Russians might give us license production.
Though PN has bought 12 Z-9s.
All i got was a increase in speed,rate of climb and range,but still lower than migs.
Why would u want to diversify fleet needlessly and create logistics nightmare unless it gives leap in ability[usually comes at a price,another problem for pak]?If Z-9 works for u stick with it.Secondly unless u buy a LOT i doubt russia will give u anything.
@Contrarian
Instead of posting one liners, you should at least cotribute your thoughts.
@AUSTERLITZ
Your assumptions are based on 'Wide Area Naval Warfare'. However Cdr Abhijit's 'analysis' is based on PN's assets and their capabilities 'according to its war doctrine of sea denial.'
Hizbullah nailed Israelis in Lebanese mountains, Afghan Mujahideen nailed the soviet union in the Afghan mountains, both of whom were no match for the force they were up against,had they been fighting an 'all out war doctrine'.
Before 'cracking up' , show some respect for the author, who's perhaps more qualified on this subject than all of us put together.
And as for Mig-29's, and Orions, PN will have its BVR capable fighters and maritime strike jets around the same time as migs become operational on the IN carrier.
@Neptune
Well PN will not be an 'offensive' force in a classic sense for foreseeable future. Our purpose for the navy is as below.
* Sea denial.
* Limited Sea Control - From Karachi to Gwadar.
* Maintain a sufficent submarine force. Ideally PN should have a fleet of 10-12 submarines including a few U-214s.
* Maintain a credible Anti Air/Surface Warfare capability.
* Establishment of a credible Nuclear Strike Capability.
The article doesn't include PN's recent not so much published coastal defense system. Its a C-602A based Land Lauched Anti Ship Missile System.
Its operational on all terrain mobile launchers,giving us effective coastal defense cabability all the way to the coast of Oman and covers all of the straight of hormoez.
JF-17 block II squadrons carrying, CM-400AKG,C-802A,Exocest, SD-10A BVRAAMs and PL-9Cs,will be handed over to the Navy's air arm. They will be backed by ZDK-03 AWACS and P-3Cs.
I really wish we could join the Milgem program and TF-4000. It would be a great boost to our naval power. BTW PN recently visited Turkey again for an exercise.
Extremely close perhaps aerodynamically.Lets take a close look at the details since u claim i'm not aware of the 'details' of whats being discussed here.And you aren't the only ones who will use awacs.
See how they match up.
MANUEVREBILITY and PERFORMANCE-
The MOST important parameter of this attribute is THRUST TO WEIGHT RATIO-
Mig-29k-1.09
Jf-17-.82
Clearly latter is completely outmatched.TW ratio under 1 is not ideal.
2nd most important parameter-
WING LOADING-
Assuming both sides carrying Air to air weaponry[as is norm for CAP fighter protecting carriers and escorting jf-17s of the strike package which would amount to around 3.5 tonnes.By empty weight plus air to air weaponry divided by wing area]
Jf-17 - 371 kg/m^2
MIG-29K -390 kg/m^2
Here due to its lighter weight and single engine jf-17 gets advantage.
Other important parameters-
RATE OF CLIMB-
Jf-17 -175m/s
Mig-29k - 330m/s
Large difference in favour of mig-29k here.
G-limit-
Jf-17-8-8.5 G
Mig-29K- 9.5G
ANGLE OF ATTACK-
Mig-29 has traditionally had awesome angle of attack-
Max 45 degrees.
F-16 has around 30 degrees.
I am guessing mig-29 has large advantage over jf-17 here.Feel free to prove me wrong.
In other parameters of performance-
Service ceiling
Mig-29k-57,400 ft
jf-17-55,500 ft
More or less equal.
Speed-
Jf-17-Max MACH 1.6
Mig-29K -Max Mach 2.2
Solid advantage again for mig-29k.
Use of composites-jf-17- none.
Mig-29K-15%
As seen above Mig-29k almost totally outperforms jf-17 in manuevreability and performance.
NEXT-
AVIONICS-
Both fighters have EW suite and radar warning recievers,countermeasures,Digital FBW,HUD [heads up display] and MFD[multi functional display],HMS.
Key parameters-
RADAR-
JF-17-
KJ-7-5m^2 target at 105 kms.Can track 10 targets in BVR mode and engage 2.Can pick up naval targets only at 135 kms.
Mig-29K-
ZHUK-ME-5m^2 target at 120 kms.Can track 10 and engage 4 simultaneously.Can pick up naval targets at 300kms.
Again solid advantage for mig-29k.
IRST tracker-
Mig-29k-yes
jf-17-no
Another clear advantage of mig-29k.
3.ARMAMENT.
9 HARDPOINTS for mig-29k.
7 hardpoints for jf-17.
jf-17.Can carry 3000kg payload.
Mig-29kCan carry 5500 kg payload.
IMPORTANTLY,
Mig-29k can use R-73 ARCHER/HMS combo with high off boresight capability.
Something the AIM-9L or chinese WVR aams are unable to match.
This would give DECISIVE advantage in close combat to mig-29k.THis was found on luftwaffe mig-29s and thats why all western nations built high off boresight WVRs- example-pythn 4/5 for israel,Aim-9X for usa,IRIS-T germany.
Another fact-
Jf-17 is equipped with a single type of BVR-
PL-12/SD-10.An ACTIVE RADAR HOMING weapon.Range 70km-100kms.
Mig-29k-
Can use BVR missiles with 3 different types of guidance,much more difficult for countermeasures to defeat.
SEMI ACTIVE RADAR HOMING-
R-27R alamo-60-80 KM
R-27ER-Max range 130 km.
PASSIVE INFRA RED HOMING-
R-27T-70 kms
R-27ET-130 kms
ACTIVE RADAR HOMING-
R-77/RVV-AE -80 kms.
Thus in all 3 parameters of performance and manuevreability,armament and avionics MIg-29k holds solid advantage.
Therefore the chances of a jf-17 strike package actually threatening carrier after getting through mig-29k umbrella are nearly non existent.