The Islamic Conquest of India Prophecy (Ghazwa-e-Hind)

[SrNair]

India were never before Roman, get your facts correct and come out from Indian version of history. Name India is just few years old. Please take something to recover from hangover.

Not India but Bharat.
Before it was Bharat that unified millenias before BC.

Clearly not, since yours is dying and ours is constantly expanding, with new members every day.

Open your eyes and look around the world .
Without even a single violence our traditions ,culture is expanding .Russia ,Western Nations etc .

No, you can use your head and pretty easily come to the same conclusion.



Tell that to:

Junaid Ibn Abdur Rahman

Mahmud Ghaznavi

Muhammad Ghauri

Qutub Uddin Aibak

Allauddin Khiliji

Sikander Shah Mir

Sikander Lodi

Babur

Mir Malagh Khan

Akbar

Shahbaz Khan Kamboh

Jahangir

Shah Jahan

Aurangzeb Alamgir

Hyder Ali

Ahmed Shah Durrani

Should I name some more?

And where are their followers ?
Lol
We are here and still thriving

 

[My-Analogous]

Not India but Bharat.
Before it was Bharat that unified millenias before BC.



Open your eyes and look around the world .
Without even a single violence our traditions ,culture is expanding .Russia ,Western Nations etc .



And where are their followers ?
Lol
We are here and still thriving

Wrong again. You batter start learning your history first. We will talk later when you are ready

 

[Amalek]

Better to start worrying about not getting lynched by RSS goons instead of daydreaming.Your survival is contingent on mamata,after mamata who will save jamatis like you from RSS goons?NRC register for bengal probably coming next.You people and RSS deserve each other.

AfrazulMandal is a troll. His objective is to inflame enmity between Hindus and Muslims. He comes across as a rabid Islamic fanatic, but he overdoes it all the time. I don't think he is a Muslim at all. Just masquerading as one.

 

[Hamza913]

And where are their followers ?

You're kidding right? You do realise that it's primarily because of these guys that there are so many Muslims in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Hindustan and Bangladesh, right?

Open your eyes and look around the world .
Without even a single violence our traditions ,culture is expanding .Russia ,Western Nations etc .

Not quite, the amount of converts Hinduism is attracting is rather minimal compared to Islam, which gets more converts than any other religion around the world today (unless you want to put Atheism into the mix). We've also got the highest birth rates among any community, which is only accelerating our expansion.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...relgion-popular-fastest-growing-a7669576.html

 

[Hindustani78]

Na. 1400 years ago, sindh and hind was different lands.

Before 1400 years ago, Sindh was province of Hindustan.

At that time sindh include Gujrat, Rajasthan way up to the kashmir. Even harapa was considered to be the in sindh.

During the era of Samrat Ashoka , Uttarapatha includes even Present Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.

Hind starts from east of Gujrat and Rajasthan.

Even Pars province was part of Hindustan/Hind.

Some from sindh people who went to meet with Prophet SAWW and they were called as people of sindh and same way when some people went from hind they were called as people of hind.

There is no hadith about people from Sindh Province gone to meet Messenger of Supreme Creator, Muhammed Pbuh but if to see in wider aspect then Salman Farsi was already there in Arabia.

Salman Al-Farsi, originally named Ruzbeh, was born into an affluent family in Jayyan near Isfahan in wider Pars.

But there is written hadith that Maharaja of Al-Hind gone to met Messenger of Supreme Creator, Muhammed Pbuh to Madinah.

Asalamu Alaikum

Careful, Akbar was a Murtad.

Dīn-i Ilāhī, was adopted by Mongol Emperor Akbar not merely for religious purposes, but as a part of general imperial administrative policy.

Mongol Emperor Akbar concluded that no single religion could claim the monopoly of truth. This inspired him to create the Dīn-i Ilāhī in 1582. Various pious Muslims, among them the Qadi of Bengal and the seminal Sufi personality Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi, responded by declaring this to be blasphemy to Islam

 

[Buddhistforlife]

I don't think it will be an invasion. But a slow takeover. It is ideal that we rule. It works.
Allah knows best.

Tell me when was the last time muslims contributed to science, medicine, art etc? You guys contributed nothing to this world except for waging war and killing innocent people like neanderthal cave men. Yet you claim you guys are civilized lots. Hindus are far more knowledgeable people and have huge contributions in science, maths and medicine.

I am a Buddhist and I dont know about Ghazwa e hind or any Islamic conquest but for now we are waging our variation of holy war against rohingya muslims

 

[Hamza913]

Dīn-i Ilāhī, was adopted by Mongol Emperor Akbar not merely for religious purposes, but as a part of general imperial administrative policy.

Still Kufr, so he's still a Murtad.

 

[24 Hours]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...relgion-popular-fastest-growing-a7669576.html

With the exception of Sub Saharan Africa this doesn't mean much in the end. Muslim fertility rates are dropping in Europe and in Asia. The former is just at the minimum for replacement level fertility. It'll be a long time before Muslim North Americans become the majority. And even if they did, they'll have the power and influence that the Jews have.

 

[randomradio]

Better to start worrying about not getting lynched by RSS goons instead of daydreaming.Your survival is contingent on mamata,after mamata who will save jamatis like you from RSS goons?NRC register for bengal probably coming next.You people and RSS deserve each other.

You are taking the guy seriously?

Especially when he says "Daru-salam" instead of "Dar al-Islam"?

We only know that the Kings of Hind will be taken prisoner from that hadith, and that Hind will be won for Islam (again.)

But there are no kings in most of the Hind. Being a democracy, the kings are the people and the leaders are the servants of the people. Even Nepal no more has a king.

The only region in Hind with a king is Pakistan. Is it possible the prophecy is talking about Iran conquering Pakistan?

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

What about the kaffirs who won't though. I mean how shall we kill them. Should we build mass gas chambers or do we do the old school beheading. Also bow should we go about destroying the false idols and what about the kids and women who are married yo these kaffirs. Should we take them as slaves?

All hypotheticals which mean nothing. I don’t know the future and neither do you.

All those things which you stated in your post are against Islamic fiqh. Read the law of Omar or the rules of war of Abu Bakr.

In most cases Rajput women married Mughal kings/Prince however some Rajput kings also married Muslim/Afghan women like Isa Khan, a muslim commander of Bengal was born to a Rajput father and a Muslim mother and Maratha peshwa Bajirao's wife Mastani was Rajout from father's side and Turkic from mothers side. But Rajputs and Brahmins generally dont marry with daughters of their enemies which was the norm in the Mughal empire. Its primarily Rajputs and Brahmins are upper caste people and intermixing with people of other caste may pollute their caste. Even when Peshwa Bajirao, a Chitpavan Brahmin, married Mastani, a half muslim, he had to face confrontation for his entire life from his mother, brothers and the Marathi brahmin society.

This is just your wishful thinking. Seems that the thought of racial mixing and adopting Islam of Rajputs bothers you. Come into the 21st century.

Most Rajputs are Muslims and live in Pakistani Punjab and Sindh. We have been intermarrying other Muslim ethnicities for a thousand years. It’s nothing new.

Not India but Bharat.
Before it was Bharat that unified millenias before BC.



Open your eyes and look around the world .
Without even a single violence our traditions ,culture is expanding .Russia ,Western Nations etc .



And where are their followers ?
Lol
We are here and still thriving

You are mixing Hinduism with Islam in your thinking.

I am curious, what kind of a Muslim do you classify yourself as.

Before 1400 years ago, Sindh was province of Hindustan.



During the era of Samrat Ashoka , Uttarapatha includes even Present Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.



Even Pars province was part of Hindustan/Hind.



There is no hadith about people from Sindh Province gone to meet Messenger of Supreme Creator, Muhammed Pbuh but if to see in wider aspect then Salman Farsi was already there in Arabia.

Salman Al-Farsi, originally named Ruzbeh, was born into an affluent family in Jayyan near Isfahan in wider Pars.

But there is written hadith that Maharaja of Al-Hind gone to met Messenger of Supreme Creator, Muhammed Pbuh to Madinah.



Dīn-i Ilāhī, was adopted by Mongol Emperor Akbar not merely for religious purposes, but as a part of general imperial administrative policy.

Mongol Emperor Akbar concluded that no single religion could claim the monopoly of truth. This inspired him to create the Dīn-i Ilāhī in 1582. Various pious Muslims, among them the Qadi of Bengal and the seminal Sufi personality Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi, responded by declaring this to be blasphemy to Islam

More pseudo-history.

I am a Buddhist and I dont know about Ghazwa e hind or any Islamic conquest but for now we are waging our variation of holy war against rohingya muslims

You are an obsessed Islamophobic bigot.

I’m watching your posts carefully. Watch what you write or you will be banned soon.

But there are no kings in most of the Hind. Being a democracy, the kings are the people and the leaders are the servants of the people. Even Nepal no more has a king.

The only region in Hind with a king is Pakistan. Is it possible the prophecy is talking about Iran conquering Pakistan?

Your disjointed way of thinking has no application in Islamic thought. We laugh when hindus try to interpret our religion.

Zakir Naik put you guys in your place.

 

[Hamza913]

Tell me when was the last time muslims contributed to science, medicine, art etc? You guys contributed nothing to this world except for waging war and killing innocent people like neanderthal cave men. Yet you claim you guys are civilized lots. Hindus are far more knowledgeable people and have huge contributions in science, maths and medicine.


I am a Buddhist and I dont know about Ghazwa e hind or any Islamic conquest but for now we are waging our variation of holy war against rohingya muslims

We wouldn't have so much violence if you guys didn't start invading our countries or oppressing our people. I'm not saying terrorism is right, but to pin it entirely on us just shows how much knowledge you lack about the whole situation.

As for the claim that "no recent Muslims have contributed to science/medicine":

https://propakistani.pk/2018/07/02/...ientist-makes-breakthrough-for-a-cancer-cure/

https://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/faculty/el-sayed/

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1999/zewail/facts/

https://www.famousscientists.org/abdul-qadeer-khan/

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2015/sancar/facts/

I can name more if you want.

It's also incredibly stupid for you to limit it to modern day contributions, when most current scientific discoveries are based on developments previously made by Muslims. In fact, the worlds first modern scientist was a Muslim:

http://www.ibnalhaytham.com/

Hindus can't be that bright if they worship cows and statues.

No matter what you do to the Muslims in Burma, it will forever pale in comparison to the beatings we have handed you throughout history. Buddhism is dead in Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of China because of the Islamic conquests. I find this poem from Mahmud Al Kashgari to be very telling of what occurred:

"We came down on them like a flood,
We went out among their cities,
We tore down the idol-temples,
We shat on the Buddha's head!"

Is it possible the prophecy is talking about Iran conquering Pakistan?

No, because Pakistan itself was always considered part of Khorasan or on the frontier of Al Hind.

It has been unanimously agreed upon that the conquest refers to the Republic of Hindustan.

In most cases Rajput women married Mughal kings/Prince however some Rajput kings also married Muslim/Afghan women like Isa Khan, a muslim commander of Bengal was born to a Rajput father and a Muslim mother and Maratha peshwa Bajirao's wife Mastani was Rajout from father's side and Turkic from mothers side. But Rajputs and Brahmins generally dont marry with daughters of their enemies which was the norm in the Mughal empire. Its primarily Rajputs and Brahmins are upper caste people and intermixing with people of other caste may pollute their caste. Even when Peshwa Bajirao, a Chitpavan Brahmin, married Mastani, a half muslim, he had to face confrontation for his entire life from his mother, brothers and the Marathi brahmin society.

Muslim converts intermarried with the foreign Muslims pretty regularly (mainly because almost nobody else would accept them after converting), especially the upper class.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Pakistan was known as Sindh based on the IVC and Indus River. Sappta Sindhu meaning Seven rivers (of Indus.) Panj aab today meaning five rivers. Sindh being a holdover from the previous name.

There are some other interesting names. While Sindh was an Arabic and Persian terminology for Pakistan, at one point it was also known as Sakastan/Sistan/Seistan based on the Saka/Scythian people from Central Asia and whom many Pakistanis descend from. Today Sistan is a name hyphenated with the Iranian Baluchistan province.

We had other names for the region. Hindus referred to our land as Vahika and our people as Mleccha referring to us as disbelievers. Vedas were mainly about our region and showed a very different idol-worshipping faith than Hinduism today. It is quite interesting that spiritually we were closer to Avestan Iran and Central Asian tribal faiths than interior Hindustan.

In short, this fertile breadbasket of the world known today as Pakistan always had a separate destiny and outlook than its neighboring Ganges-based nation. Islam only made that difference more pronounced.

 

[Hindustani78]

Still Kufr, so he's still a Murtad.

Murtad means a renegade ie. one who professed Islam at one stage thereafter turned apostate and left Islam.

Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi, responded by declaring this to be blasphemy to Islam

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Muslim converts intermarried with the foreign Muslims pretty regularly (mainly because almost nobody else would accept them after converting), especially the upper class.

Most of the first converts in our region were upper class. Hindus and Hindu priests instigated much chaos and persecution, which led to garrison towns to protect these converts.

I will tell you one thing, Rajputs never truly believed in Hinduism. We have always eaten beef, and worshipped only three deities: Fire, Sun, and Moon. This is the classification of Rajputs today on tribal lines.

You would never find a Rajput bowing down to a statue of a multi-armed fanged Kali Mata. It’s ridiculous. Most Rajputs were worshipped by Hindus for martial prowess and heroic victories.

Conversion of the Rajputs is what led to the Mughals and Turks being able to rule Sindh and Hindustan for a thousand years.

Rajputs respected these characteristics in a person. Bravery, honesty, patience, strength, compassion, justice, and truth.

The Muslim rulers, soldiers, and scholars who came had all these attributes and more, which made their conversion inevitable.

We just adopted a more advanced and superior civilization. No offense to Hindus.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

We wouldn't have so much violence if you guys didn't start invading our countries or oppressing our people. I'm not saying terrorism is right, but to pin it entirely on us just shows how much knowledge you lack about the whole situation.

As for the claim that "no recent Muslims have contributed to science/medicine":

https://propakistani.pk/2018/07/02/...ientist-makes-breakthrough-for-a-cancer-cure/

https://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/faculty/el-sayed/

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1999/zewail/facts/

https://www.famousscientists.org/abdul-qadeer-khan/

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2015/sancar/facts/

I can name more if you want.

It's also incredibly stupid for you to limit it to modern day contributions, when most current scientific discoveries are based on developments previously made by Muslims. In fact, the worlds first modern scientist was a Muslim:

http://www.ibnalhaytham.com/

Hindus can't be that bright if they worship cows and statues.

No matter what you do to the Muslims in Burma, it will forever pale in comparison to the beatings we have handed you throughout history. Buddhism is dead in Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of China because of the Islamic conquests. I find this poem from Mahmud Al Kashgari to be very telling of what occurred:

"We came down on them like a flood,
We went out among their cities,
We tore down the idol-temples,
We shat on the Buddha's head!"



No, because Pakistan itself was always considered part of Khorasan or on the frontier of Al Hind.

It has been unanimously agreed upon that the conquest refers to the Republic of Hindustan.



Muslim converts intermarried with the foreign Muslims pretty regularly (mainly because almost nobody else would accept them after converting), especially the upper class.

No body invaded muslim countries. Since the early days of Islam muslims have shown aggression against people of other faiths. The Rashidun Calips who were considered as the caliphs of a pure Islamic state killed and persecuted Zoroastrians after they conquered Persia. Millions of Zoroastrians fled to India where they were given refuge. They are now known as Parsis. Muslims have been savages since its founding.

We wouldn't have so much violence if you guys didn't start invading our countries or oppressing our people. I'm not saying terrorism is right, but to pin it entirely on us just shows how much knowledge you lack about the whole situation.

As for the claim that "no recent Muslims have contributed to science/medicine":

https://propakistani.pk/2018/07/02/...ientist-makes-breakthrough-for-a-cancer-cure/

https://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/faculty/el-sayed/

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1999/zewail/facts/

https://www.famousscientists.org/abdul-qadeer-khan/

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2015/sancar/facts/

I can name more if you want.

It's also incredibly stupid for you to limit it to modern day contributions, when most current scientific discoveries are based on developments previously made by Muslims. In fact, the worlds first modern scientist was a Muslim:

http://www.ibnalhaytham.com/

Hindus can't be that bright if they worship cows and statues.

No matter what you do to the Muslims in Burma, it will forever pale in comparison to the beatings we have handed you throughout history. Buddhism is dead in Afghanistan, Pakistan and parts of China because of the Islamic conquests. I find this poem from Mahmud Al Kashgari to be very telling of what occurred:

"We came down on them like a flood,
We went out among their cities,
We tore down the idol-temples,
We shat on the Buddha's head!"



No, because Pakistan itself was always considered part of Khorasan or on the frontier of Al Hind.

It has been unanimously agreed upon that the conquest refers to the Republic of Hindustan.



Muslim converts intermarried with the foreign Muslims pretty regularly (mainly because almost nobody else would accept them after converting), especially the upper class.

'No matter what you do to the Muslims in Burma, it will forever pale in comparison to the beatings we have handed you throughout history'

So why do you say that we Buddhists are terrorists for killing muslims in Burma when you guys persecuted millions of Buddhists in Pakistan, Afghanistan and China? Who are the real terrorists?