What's new

The future of Muslims in India according to the Hindus

There is a reason for this.

Our religion makes sense. Yours do not. You know this.

To hide your insecurity, you come up with hate - unabridged hate for Islam and Muslims. This is a trend all over the world. What you call aggressive religious life is what gives us the moral values to live our lives. We dont rape women with a pulse, petty crimes are minimal in all Muslim countries, social indicators are better among even poverty stricken Indian Muslims, we don't abandon wives and so on. You get the gist.

While you consider an animal as a God and lynch people for allegedly carrying its meat.
Let's not go on whose religion makes sense. You know very well that this is PDF and we can't write about Islam.

You keep your religion and we keep ours.
 
. .
Are you willing to let go of some of our core values and them deciding the number of kids we have? Family size is something personal and should be decided by the parents - not some insecure Hindu.
1) I am for UCC (a neutral and well drafted one with all concerns listened) but not for population control shit as it may have harmful effects like female foeticide. TFR will be bought down by education.
2) Personal law is really a mess; there would have been two ways - either they were accommodating for matters like TT/Halala or they should be abolished but they are adamant about these issues, they're adamant about polygamy which in India have even lose restrictions than many other Muslim countries. In short they're regressive and are not willing to change, so unfortunately we've to go for the second option.
You wouldn't believe it ( because you don't want to ) but a large portion of Hindus' grudge against Muslims comes from your "aggressive religious life" that is perceived as a threat. Your habit of forcing your religion in everyone's face is what makes everyone insecure.
That's a crude generalisation, and when did someone forced a Hindu for Namaz?
Yes there are many other grudges we have. The implicit support of separatists and terrorists is the main one.
Hear hear @Cliftonite
We don't even fund them, what else do you want?
But for Muslims it is still high.
It's 2.6, ST have 2.5 and SC have 2.3.
The other issue is that you want all govt benefits but "Kaagaz nahi dikhayenge"
Remove either CAA or NRC. You can't have it both ways.
The same here, afaik.

@Naofumi @xeuss
Exact same, so much for the different civilisation.
 
. . . .
1) I am for UCC (a neutral and well drafted one with all concerns listened) but not for population control shit as it may have harmful effects like female foeticide. TFR will be bought down by education.
2) Personal law is really a mess; there would have been two ways - either they were accommodating for matters like TT/Halala or they should be abolished but they are adamant about these issues, they're adamant about polygamy which in India have even lose restrictions than many other Muslim countries. In short they're regressive and are not willing to change, so unfortunately we've to go for the second option.

That's a crude generalisation, and when did someone forced a Hindu for Namaz?

Hear hear @Cliftonite
We don't even fund them, what else do you want?

It's 2.6, ST have 2.5 and SC have 2.3.

Remove either CAA or NRC. You can't have it both ways.

Exact same, so much for the different civilisation.
@xeuss @The_Showstopper your perspectives please.

I doubt further appeasement will help... but that's just me.
 
.
Remove either CAA or NRC. You can't have it both ways
CAA - gives fast track (not guaranteed) citizenship to certain class of refugees who by the way are already residents of India

NRC - Let's the government know who is a genuine citizen of the country

Tell me logically, not rhetorically why any of this is a problem?

If you say "Chronology" let me break it down.

1 Hindu with no papers. He will have to prove that he fled from Pak, Afg, BD before 31st Dec 2014. If he is genuine refugee he will prove it. If he has no papers he can't prove it and he becomes doubtful

2 Muslims with no papers. He will have to prove he applied for asylum on religious grounds. If he is genuine refugee he will prove it. If he has no papers he can't prove it and he becomes doubtful
 
.
Holy crap.
read the last page has given me cancer and made me retarded at the same time.

Are you Indians adults or freaking children?

Like what the F--ING HELL?

"We will victimize Muslims because we don't like their breakfast"

never in the history of universe has a majority of a BILLION people acted more like pu---ies due to a 15% minority.
And that too, over nonsense like "you are too religious" "You are victimizing us with your beards"

.... at least that a@@hole Hitler blamed Jews for loosing ww1.
What do you people have?
"you have too many children"

Like... I don't even know what to say.

India is on the verge of genocide with the suffering of 100s of millions of people an over what?
adult men who can't handle other people living their lives the way they want.

and before you go running to the mods, I have not insulted anyone personally, expect Hitler.

CAA - gives fast track (not guaranteed) citizenship to certain class of refugees who by the way are already residents of India

NRC - Let's the government know who is a genuine citizen of the country

Tell me logically, not rhetorically why any of this is a problem?

If you say "Chronology" let me break it down.

1 Hindu with no papers. He will have to prove that he fled from Pak, Afg, BD before 31st Dec 2014. If he is genuine refugee he will prove it. If he has no papers he can't prove it and he becomes doubtful

2 Muslims with no papers. He will have to prove he applied for asylum on religious grounds. If he is genuine refugee he will prove it. If he has no papers he can't prove it and he becomes doubtful

is that really a question?
1. It has a religious test, which is abject discrimination

2. it does not include Hindus from SriLanka, who have just gone thought a civil war and has a sizable Hindu Tamil population who are being victimized as they lost the civil war.
This is proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that this law is not designed to help non Muslims, it's designed to be a weapon against Muslims.
 
.
.
@xeuss @The_Showstopper your perspectives please.

I doubt further appeasement will help... but that's just me.

All issues cited are major issues for Hindus, not Muslims. Therefore, Muslims should stop discussing these stupid issues that these retards obsess over.

The only reason these are issues for Hindus because they think Muslims have some perceived benefit from these, and these perceived benefits must be curtailed.

When did any Hindu, or BJP, discuss the following about Muslims:
1. Improving education standards
2. Implementing Sachar commission recommendations
3. Providing meaningful employment
4. Providing security from Sanghi mobs

These are the issues that burn within the Muslim community. Instead, we get these Sanghi retards discussing Triple Talaq, UCC, Halala, Halal food, non-veg food, Pakistan
 
.
When did any Hindu, or BJP, discuss the following about Muslims:
1. Improving education standards
2. Implementing Sachar commission recommendations
3. Providing meaningful employment
4. Providing security from Sanghi mobs
And when did Muslims talked about it?
 
. .
Not sure what to say if you are ignorant on what the community wants.
No, bro I just saw that Muslims protested for TT/Halala, Babri Masjid etc but never for reservations/employment.
 
.
No, bro I just saw that Muslims protested for TT/Halala, Babri Masjid etc but never for reservations/employment.

I think we follow different news items and go around with different Muslims of India. You can keep believing what you wrote. I don't think a response is warranted for your prejudicial thoughts.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom