absarahmedkhan
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2009
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 0
I'll tell you why, which is more like stating the obvious
J&K is a Muslim majority state and they have an obvious inclination towards Pakistan which is a declared Islamic State. This is just natural human nature that (birds of a feather flock together).
Muslims in the rest of India are more scattered and intermingled with the local culture whereas Kashmir's have lived in a cluster forever and with such close geographical proximity to Pak , added to the sympathy of Pak with Kashmiri's , plebiside is a gamble in which India only stands to loose.Also, the fact that around 3-4 Lac Kashmiri pundits were flushed out of the State by terrorists or slaughtered like lambs means that any plebeside is devoid of a fair reflection of the lands original inhabitants.
While it's important to respect peoples wishes , a nation cannot entertain the possibility of parting with territorial assets for it.
India does not want to risk losing a state (hence no plebeside). What it can do is make the life of the people easier by giving them more autonomy, but for that purpose it is necessary that Army is 1st withdrawn and for that it's necessary to have Zero militancy.
That makes a wretched reason to support your argument, I'm sorry.
Former Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru had promised to the people of Kashmir that they would be given right of self-determination. The promise is yet to be fulfilled. When? No one knows.