GURU DUTT
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,363
- Reaction score
- -75
- Country
- Location
well jammer bhiyye its all about proorities for pakistan they have only warfare as top prioroties for india its economy hence we spend and invest money difrenetly (less than 2.3% of GDP on defence that incluedes salaries and penssions and forien aquasitions)Some history lessons for the weekend warriors....In December 1971, Five of the 25 Squadrons deployed by the IAF in west were MiG-21s while another three were operational in the Eastern sector....The IAF completed some 4000 sorties in the Western sector compared to 2840 for the PAF.... an airforce some three time size of the PAF....only did marginally better in the sortie rate.....the Jordanian F-104s arrived in the closing days of the war and played little or no part in the conflict.....despite making tall claims about shooting down 9 F-104s, the IAF could only show wrecks of one or two Starfighters in natural metal finish, where as Jordanian machines were in dessert camouflage.
View attachment 425945
kidd i know defnce and warfare and even your nations defnce better than what you know about your own nationLook, I don't intend to demean you in any way, but you have displayed an utter lack of understanding regarding aerial warfare. So you are not impressing anyone about IAF's prowess. What I am trying to say is there are better people to talk about IAF's capabilities and maybe you should leave this matter up to them.
so lets not go there you are nobody to demean me
ariel warfare is won and lost when you totally overpower your enemy and produce some results and get ariel superiorty over your enemy but pakistan could never have had that niether in 1965 nor in 1971 or 1999 hence it could not make IAF or IN or IA worthless and get kashmir or did it
so what is the might of PAF then of any use to pakistan in 1965