What's new

The EU says it does not want to destabilize russia to this extreme

I was never anti Chinese. I only argued with some of the Chinese members on here that were making up things out of thin air. Kind of like what Marcus does.

How about this part?

What do you think of China's $800 billion gas deal with Russia, our huge purchases of Russian oil and the recent Sino-Russian currency swaps to bolster the strength of the Ruble?

Do you think we are trying to squeeze profits out of you?
 
.
German foreign minister Steinmeier and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Mogherini said yesterday that it was not and is not the EU wish to push russia into economic chaos.

As I wrote long ago, the EU was going to be all show and no spine.

Russia played chicken and the EU lost its nerve.

Putin knew it all along.
 
.
Ou do realize that lagrange points have nothing to do with a stable orbit?



You do realize that i quoted NASA? And you do realize you are in no position to argue science when you can not spell or compile a coherent sentence?




owhat does the moon stabilize in it orbit around earth?


Ever heard of English? Try using it.



:) The rest of your bla bla is too boring for me to waste time with.



In other words my arguments were too strong and compelling so you just gave up.


come bavk when you learned italian, the. we argue



This is an English forum, come back when you learn English.

How about this part?



The gas deal benefits both sides. Russia gets the money, China gets the energy. As for currency swapping, both Russia and China are sending a message to the US that it can not do whatever it pleases without consequences. For over a decade the US has been overthrowing governments either by bombing them or funding opposition to topple those governments, most of the time the people that take power afterwards are anti Russian or at worst try to hurt Russia's interests. Imagine if Russia did what the US did in Ukraine to America's neighbors. Just as bad the US has been encircling Russia. Presently they have tanks and soldiers on the Russian border. They intercept Russian aircraft flying in international airspace near the Russian border and then call Russia aggressors. They have been doing the same in China, parking carrier groups off the Chinese coast, flying over disputed Chinese islands. Both Russia and China are very unhappy with Obama and company.
 
.
You do realize that i quoted NASA? And you do realize you are in no position to argue science when you can not spell or compile a coherent sentence?







Ever heard of English? Try using it.







In other words my arguments were too strong and compelling so you just gave up.






This is an English forum, come back when you learn English.





The gas deal benefits both sides. Russia gets the money, China gets the energy. As for currency swapping, both Russia and China are sending a message to the US that it can not do whatever it pleases without consequences. For over a decade the US has been overthrowing governments either by bombing them or funding opposition to topple those governments, most of the time the people that take power afterwards are anti Russian or at worst try to hurt Russia's interests. Imagine if Russia did what the US did in Ukraine to America's neighbors. Just as bad the US has been encircling Russia. Presently they have tanks and soldiers on the Russian border. They intercept Russian aircraft flying in international airspace near the Russian border and then call Russia aggressors. They have been doing the same in China, parking carrier groups off the Chinese coast, flying over disputed Chinese islands. Both Russia and China are very unhappy with Obama and company.

you quoted the classical two body problem. That has nothing to do with orbits in the classical sense. As i said you have no clue what you talk about russkie. The lagrange points are important when you want ballance a satellite between two celestial bodies. Like the kepler telescope.

I give you a hint. We are unhappy with your presence on earth. Your airplanes fly without transponder and bring civilian airliners in danger. Not that it matters for you as the shot down of MH17 showed. Russia is a terrorist country and it is dealt with like one. I like how your people suffer and pay more and more for evrything. :)

Come back when you learn about shower, soap and other basic civilisational things. Then we talk about your "interests". We have security interests and russia is a threat for our security.
 
. . .
China gives a **** about russia. Its just diplomacy. EU is chinas biggest trading parter. Russia is smaller in economy than netherlands alone.

You must be deluded if you imagine that China, the super capitalist of the world" would chose russia over its biggest trading partner.

Russia believes in resource gathering, than business gathering. That is the first lesson in pseudo socialist economy. If they have resources, they can feed their people easily. If that can be countered by EU, only then Russia will be affected.
 
.
Russia will be forced into war and take over Europe
Familiar of my familar who is in the intelligence once said that if the commander in chief ordered, then in a few weeks Berlin wall will be start to rebuilt. European armies is a joke. Shadow of the shadow of the force that Europe was once.
 
.
Familiar of my familar who is in the intelligence once said that if the commander in chief ordered, then in a few weeks Berlin wall will be start to rebuilt. European armies is a joke. Shadow of the shadow of the force that Europe was once.

No and you know why? People love freedom. I would rather fight to the death than living under russian tyranny and barbarism.
 
.
Familiar of my familar who is in the intelligence once said that if the commander in chief ordered, then in a few weeks Berlin wall will be start to rebuilt. European armies is a joke. Shadow of the shadow of the force that Europe was once.

I dont think that will be possible.

The combined armies of France, Germany and UK are more than a match for the Russia army. Russia has more tanks but the EU tanks are superior.

If required then there is a division of US troops in Germany with the excellent Abrams tanks to help out.
 
.
I dont think that will be possible.

The combined armies of France, Germany and UK are more than a match for the Russia army. Russia has more tanks but the EU tanks are superior.

If required then there is a division of US troops in Germany with the excellent Abrams tanks to help out.
They were ran out of ammunition, even when they fought against Gaddafi. In fact, the majority of Europeans will just raise the white flag, as it was during World War II. Their toy army can fight only against the colonies in Africa. Without the help of America Russia can conquer Europe for 2-3 weeks.
 
.
They were ran out of ammunition, even when they fought against Gaddafi. In fact, the majority of Europeans will just raise the white flag, as it was during World War II. Their toy army can fight only against the colonies in Africa. Without the help of America Russia can conquer Europe for 2-3 weeks.

you cant hold it. Also would like to know why exactly you would find it so good to ruin my and evryones life?
 
.
Some people here think that a war today is won by masses of soldiers and tanks how funny....... and russian army can conquer europe...
What do some people smoke ?
A war now is won by well trained soldiers,good officers,and technology.
Russian army is just obsolete,and can just fight countries like georgia.
Also,run out of munitions,is russian fantasy crap,just like for the mistral,they said we'll have to give them 10 billions loool.
(With loosing many tanks,armored vehicles,aircrafts looool)
 
Last edited:
.
They were ran out of ammunition, even when they fought against Gaddafi. In fact, the majority of Europeans will just raise the white flag, as it was during World War II. Their toy army can fight only against the colonies in Africa. Without the help of America Russia can conquer Europe for 2-3 weeks.

You forget that EU would have air superiority against Russian air-force. Those small numbers of SU-35s will be easily swept out of the sky by the hundreds of Eurofighters and Rafales. Older SU-27s and Mig-29s are not really any match for the Euro-canard fighters

The Russian army is no Soviet Union. I think that in the 1980s, the Soviet Union could have occupied Western Europe if it wanted to, even against the 300,000 US troops that were based in Germany. The Soviet Union had the most powerful army in the history of the planet.:D
 
.
You forget that EU would have air superiority against Russian air-force. Those small numbers of SU-35s will be easily swept out of the sky by the hundreds of Eurofighters and Rafales. Older SU-27s and Mig-29s are not really any match for the Euro-canard fighters

The Russian army is no Soviet Union. I think that in the 1980s, the Soviet Union could have occupied Western Europe if it wanted to, even against the 300,000 US troops that were based in Germany. The Soviet Union had the most powerful army in the history of the planet.:D
You probably did not read the recent news from the German magazine. The Commission found that in the German army fit for combat techniques about 15%. In the Russian army, this figure - 85%. Russia conducts regular exercises with tens of thousands of pieces of equipment and hundreds of aircraft, more than 150,000 soldiers. Europe simply can not imagine how a real attack looks like. Fight with the Bedouins or Negroes and fight with the giant war machine - it is incomparable.
No advantage in the air they do not have. The Su-27 is not inferior to European planes, new Su-30 and Su-35 surpass them. And do not forget that Russia has a total superiority in air defense. It will be total no-fly zone. Without help of Master they will loose in 2-3 weeks. Or even faster.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom