Balochistan, E.Pakistan, funding terrorism in Pakistan etc.
Now, you'll just deny all of these and say "Oh oh what proof do you have" ...and these lines of yours show how belligerent indians are, when given chance.
India would logically want to grow and follow the trajectory that we have set after long years of debt and god-awful poverty.
Every country's long-term goal is prosperity and so is ours.
For us the fight is to maintain politcal status-quo over all our (India-Pakistan, India-China, etc) mutual issues of discord.
The classical Indian opinion is to defend the territories inherited from the British.
Having said that, the most fearful scenario for us is to have an 'unstable' neighbour, riddled with internal strife and uncertainity.
The prospect of not knowing who is accountable in Pakistan and who to engage with is a policy nightmare.
This was seen recently when actions were attributed to 'non-state actors' by the GoP.
Waging a War with Pakistan would be a long-term losing proposition for the following reasons:
a) Will put a big dent in our economy
b) Will kill the possibility of trade with a good market in Pakistan
c) Industries, dams, power stations, railways,roads,ports,etc will be damaged directly
d) FDI/FII will stop and stock markets will fall
e) May result in high war time taxes and most importantly,
f) Will weaken us and increase the gap viz-a-viz China which to many is a far greater threat
Though war does momentarily increase the GDP, but the effect will be muted and swallowed shortly by us fighting a war right around our own territory (which is not the case with US which has had good periods of economic growth after conflicts save for the recent ones which follow a deviation from their economic policies...discussing which will take our discussion sideways)
So, in order to make more money, we want to continue growing as a global services powerhouse and make money by sharpening our competitive edge and not actively incite Pakistan into an armed conflict. We have followed this recently by not engaging Pakistan after the Mumbai attacks. It was clearly voiced by Dr. Singh and co. that we want to help the civilian government.
This course has been taken by the Americans as well who offlate have had problems dealing with Pakistan.
They want a strong federally controlled and responsible government in Pakistan.
A great threat from India would be a trade imbalance. War would not happen unless thrust upon us.
Now I can't categorically prove what I have said
also , but I do believe that you'd get the logic in my drift.
Inside, you guys 'enjoy' the deaths of thousands of Pakistanis and feel 'good' that RAW/Indians have a part to play in this game of destruction going on in Pakistan. From outside, you guys tend to act innocent and demand 'proofs'---just to make this even more 'fun'.
That's a blame nobody can back.
Personally, I do not enjoy the deaths of other people who have families and want to provide for their kin and live a simple life.
You have to belive that there are humans living on this side of the border too and we do not find joy in murder.
We lived together for centuries. Have cultural anf even family ties across the border. My own maternal side is from Sialkot.
The joy we get with cultural exchanges of students, atrists or with sport testifies that the pursuit of peace is both sought and logical.
Please do not dehumanize a nation by sweeping statements like these.
The only bad part is : Pakistan knows
exactly what kind of people indians are...hence, you aint gonna see any slowing down of military build-up by Pakistan
As long as your military stays withing your borders.
As long as you view us as a threat that can only be dealt with force, you stand to harm your own growth.
