“ The Bared sword upon the neck of the Blasphemer of Rasool Allah”: Defending Article 295-C

[Fawad alam]

OK so there's no logic in it (and logic doesn't work with you guys anyway my mistake) but tell me how will you convince a non-Muslim to accept Islam or how can you bring him towards Islam or how can you tell him about the message of Prophet when you're killing people? how will you convince them that Prophet came with message of peace? how will you convince them that our Prophet was full of mercy and love? and if someone is disrespecting my father than i will do the damage with tongue not with hands like Jaahils.

Dear the path of our Prophet peace be upon him is very clear,
1st you have to change your self,
then you try to spread the peace,
after if you are able to hold a territory,
Enforce the law of shariah, like Salat( even if you dont like you have to do ), zakat, Jihad ect .

Do not mix the 1st and last step

 

[Tipu7]

So, now accepting and following the Holy Quran is a "Fitnah" !!!!

Plz develop habit of reading full sentence & understanding complete meaning.
It's helps a lot ......

 

[The Sandman]

1st you have to change your self,
then you try to spread the peace

Exactly you can't spread peace if you've have murdered someone thanks for making this clear to everyone. . You've to be a peace loving guy who can tolerate a lot.

 

[M. Sarmad]

Plz develop habit of reading full sentence & understanding complete meaning.
It's helps a lot ......

Do you have anything positive to say/contribute to this discussion ?

 

[The Sandman]

Leave them on their own, these few dozen illiterates cannot make a difference.....

Better to be an illiterate than to praise criminals.

 

[Tipu7]

Better to be an illiterate than to praise criminals.

Illiterate cannot differentiate heros & criminals

Do you have anything positive to say/contribute to this discussion ?

Taught you an important lesson of life.
What else positive I can do for your sake?

 

[M. Sarmad]

You are more literate than Jinnah? Who offer his services ti Ghazi Ilm Din Shaheed?

1) Jinnah was not the trial lawyer. Ilam Din had entered the not guilty plea through his trial lawyer who was a lawyer from Lahore named Farrukh Hussain. The trial court ruled against Ilam Din. The trial lawyer appealed in the Lahore High Court and got Jinnah to appear as the lawyer in appeal.


2) Jinnah did not defend the actions of Ilam Din. He had attacked the evidence on legal grounds. Jinnah’s contention was that the evidence produced before the trial court was insufficient and the prosecution story was dubious. The court did not accept Jinnah's contention


3) Mr Jinnah finally contended that the sentence of death was not called for and urged as extenuating circumstances, that the appellant is only 19 or 20 years of age and that his act was prompted by feelings of veneration for the founder of his religion and anger at one who had scurrilously attacked him. This contention was rejected as well

 

[The Sandman]

This pic is enough for lot of people on this thread. @Azlan Haider we've kept our cool through out this thread it's clear who's losing the arguments here.

 

[The Sandman]

Only retard resort to this.

A psycho or should i say mentally challenged person is calling other retards oh the irony hahahaha what a shameless idiot you're even after losing the challenge you're still here on PDF lol confused item saala anyways welcome to my ignore list mods will take care of trash like you soon anyway.

 

[SouI]

Call me or give me your number if your a real man with b@lls

What are you gonna do, kill him?

 

[Hamza913]

How about we just don't kill people over trivial issues?

 

[Respect4Respect01]

Hafiz Saeed is no more asset for us. Gone are days of proxy wars, no doubt our military used him in past but Now, it's time to kill snakes. CIA created Taliban. But when they feel threaten , they killed same snakes for the best interest of U.S.A.
Same case in Pakistan, providing safe place for hafiz Saeed is not in the interest of Pakistan ,We used him as tissue paper in past but it's time to throw him because he is chief of banned organization, and we have to walk with U.N , and we can't afford sanctions. We used him as long as he was in the interest of Pakistan, but Now, he is liability. Government and military knows it very well. They will do decision in the Best interest of Pakistan. Inshallah

What kind of logic is that? USA creates and fights "snakes" because their economy depends on wars, if they don't start any wars then they will be doomed. Don't compare Pakistan with USA, these two countries are totally different in every way.
Secondly, Kashmir issue is not dead and will never die until it is resolved properly. Hafiz Saeed is a citizen of Pakistan, he deserves fair treatment like rest of the citizens, you ask for fair trail for those extremist bloggers, but you don't want to accept that HS was set free by the same court. 'Lives' are not like a tissue paper, people who think that way are abnormal, it is better to face sanctions and be a proud nation than selling your people for money. U.N is the most useless and gutless organization in the world, it does what USA and other powerful countries dictate them to do. Plus nobody care about U.N now it is a different world, there is no single superpower now.
If you really wanna get rid of someone then it is people like Hussain Haqqani who betrayed Pakistan, not people like HS who supported Pakistan.

 

[SouI]

If they abuse our Prophet and other holy personalities and Govt keeps mums then yes.

Even feel hoot to do that when our Govt do nothing,,,,

If Mohammad were alive today, he would get you hanged, not him, as you are the problem, not him.

 

[Fawad alam]

If Mohammad were alive today, he would get you hanged, not him, as you are the problem, not him.

How you are saying like this?
Almost all the religious scholars of Pakistan are agreed on this law and this law is made by our Parliament, you dont need to worry about this and if any body comes to Pakistan he must follow the law of the land.
Not more than few peoples being punished by this law from decades and on the other hand , Masters of democracy and freedom are killing hundreds every day.

 

[malik_qasim]

this article is a must read,
it holds nothing back,
and gives it all away...
full marks for truth or spilling the beans i will say..
many Muslims who try to explain these events in a different light, it will be quite disappointing for them to read it..
a law can be made and amended.. and they can be draconian, to be full flat pointless.
question should be is this law ethical..?
now how will you answer that..
for an action to be considered ethical it has to be first of all, universally applicable.
so is this law universally applicable..?
do you want every human society to apply such law..?
do we should hang all the people in the world who disrespect religion founders? or should our
beloved prophet Muhammad PBUH only deserve this law, which will guarantee that his magnificence to be upheld all the time above the other creations basic rights...?
and Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiyani do not deserve it.. right?
do people in other countries hang you for disrespecting Zeus Ram Jesus Buddha or Confucius,
or do you want them to have a Muslim hang or flogged for disrespecting the Hindu concept of reincarnation..?
now as we all know
all these expansionist religions like our mightier Islam and those pesky christian they have to collide with other peoples religion to win over converts.
so do such laws would make the world a better place..?
or will they just start another murder spree..?
and what will be considered a disrespect..?
is criticizing and not believing a disrespect..? some will agree yes.
and is there any guarantee that such laws will not creep in magnitude..?
i mean in future saints, companions of our beloved prophet, government n army officials name will not be added to the list.
all these questions need a reasonable answer..
.
.
kings and emperors used to execute people for disrespecting them, i believe our beloved prophet should not be generalize with the kind of those.
kings and emperors have the power of the sword.. prophets posses only the power of there god.
so in the end it will all melt down to how a person is remembered as, rather then what kind of a person he really was..