manlion
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2013
- Messages
- 7,568
- Reaction score
- -3
In that case, no state would call themselves Indians as the concept of India never existed before. The moment a state is included in the Union of India, they should identify themselves as Indians first and anything only after that. Moreover, you ill informed pakistani naysayers and false flaggers feel our Tamil brothers want to secede from India but I myself am a South Indian with 4 years of my bachelors education in Chennai and my fellow Tamilians are as much Indians as any of us are
You should read my response in the context between race vs nationality, which comes first. Nationality can change but not race. An Indian who takes up another country's citizenship ceases to be Indian but doesnt lose his/her racial identity.
Your logic using Chennai as a sample - is misleading as more than 30 % of Chennai pop comprises of non Tamils.
When India treats Tamilnadu like an enemy country, why should Tamils identify themselves as Indians ? India's enemies Pakistan and China , are not Tamils enemies. Ancient Tamils have had long trade/cultural links with China, so its meaningless for Tamils to fight Indian's enemies, just because they live under Indian Union. This will further illustrate my point. Pakistan owes Tamils a favour ....
By the 1940s, Periyar supported Muslim League's claim for a separate Pakistan, and expected its support in return.
In an interview with the Governor of Madras, Jinnah, the main leader of Muslim League, said that India should be divided into four regions: Dravidistan, Hindustan, Bengalistan and Pakistan; Dravidistan would approximately consist of the area under the Madras Presidency.
Jinnah stated "I have every sympathy and shall do all to help, and you establish Dravidistan where the 7 per cent Muslim population will stretch its hands of friendship and live with you on lines of security, justice and fairplay."
https://www.siasat.pk/forum/showthr...it-Leader-B-R-Ambedkar-is-also-in-the-picture