Taking Stock, post escalation

[R Wing]

So, here we are. Let's tally.

There is literally no proof of anything India is claiming (mainly killing 350 "terrorists" and downing an F-16)

Day 1
Pulwama attack
40+ paramilitary troops dead

Next:
Calm before the storm

Next:
Indian airspace violation and payloads dropped on a hillside
No blood, no bodies, no damaged infrastructure
Reuters says no proof of any loss of life or buildings: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-militants-india-says-it-bombed-idUSKCN1QH298

Next:
IAF WC commits suicide in barracks; highly suspect timing (admitted by India)
PAF attacks ground targets (admitted by India)
PAF downs 2x IAF jets (1x jet admitted by India)
PAK captures 1x pilot (admitted by India)
IAF loses 6x officers in helo crash in IOK (admitted by India)
IAF claims downing of 1x F-16 (no proof given)

All in...
PAKISTAN LOSSES
Some trees on a hillside
No military losses

INDIAN LOSSES (CONFIRMED)
1x IAF Mig21
1x IAF officer captured
6x IAF officers KIA
40 paramilitary troops KIA
At least one military target attacked by PAF jets
IAF WC suicide

INDIAN LOSSES (PROBABLE)
All of the above, plus
1x IAF Mig29 or Su30
2x IAF officers KIA
Several military targets attacked by PAF jets

WOW...

 

[Dante80]

Why are you specifically counting the Pulwama attack in this Pakistan vs India tally?

 

[I S I]

Why are you specifically counting the Pulwama attack in this Pakistan vs India tally?

Because we did it.

 

[Lincoln]

So, here we are. Let's tally.

There is literally no proof of anything India is claiming (mainly killing 350 "terrorists" and downing an F-16)

Day 1
Pulwama attack
40+ paramilitary troops dead

Next:
Calm before the storm

Next:
Indian airspace violation and payloads dropped on a hillside
No blood, no bodies, no damaged infrastructure
Reuters says no proof of any loss of life or buildings: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-militants-india-says-it-bombed-idUSKCN1QH298

Next:
IAF WC commits suicide in barracks; highly suspect timing (admitted by India)
PAF attacks ground targets (admitted by India)
PAF downs 2x IAF jets (1x jet admitted by India)
PAK captures 1x pilot (admitted by India)
IAF loses 6x officers in helo crash in IOK (admitted by India)
IAF claims downing of 1x F-16 (no proof given)

All in...
PAKISTAN LOSSES
Some trees on a hillside
No military losses

INDIAN LOSSES (CONFIRMED)
1x IAF Mig21
1x IAF officer captured
6x IAF officers KIA
40 paramilitary troops KIA
At least one military target attacked by PAF jets
IAF WC suicide

INDIAN LOSSES (PROBABLE)
All of the above, plus
1x IAF Mig29 or Su30
2x IAF officers KIA
Several military targets attacked by PAF jets

WOW...

Ought to mention, after ISPR warned of a response, heavy, very heavy firing and shelling immediately took place on the LOC and armour was being moved to the borders in the night immediately by Pakistan. The amount of soldiers killed there are still unaccounted for, there are rumors that very heavy losses were inflicted onto the Indian Army.

 

[Black Bird]

Ought to mention, after ISPR warned of a response, heavy, very heavy firing and shelling immediately took place on the LOC and armour was being moved to the borders in the nightmare immediately by Pakistan. The amount of soldiers killed there are still unaccounted for, there are rumors that very heavy losses were inflicted onto the Indian Army.

Allah hamry Jawano ki madad farmy.Ameen

 

[R Wing]

Because we did it.

Because that is what led to this escalation --- India's "attack" was in direct 'retaliation' to Pulwama. And it is a body count that both sides seem to agree on.

 

[Cookie Monster]

Why are you specifically counting the Pulwama attack in this Pakistan vs India tally?

Bcuz that's how all this started. They blamed Pak without showing any proof and sent in their fighter jets to attack. So if Pak is being blamed and attacked for Pulwama then Pak should at least be able to claim those 40 kills...no?

 

[R Wing]

Bcuz that's how all this started. They blamed Pak without showing any proof and sent in their fighter jets to attack. So if Pak is being blamed and attacked for Pulwama then Pak should at least be able to claim those 40 kills...no?

And, in my tally, I didn't imply that Pakistan claims them --- my tally is about losses, and those were the Indian-side losses that started this mess (due to their insanely brutal and illegal occupation of an internationally-recognized disputed territory.)

 

[Verve]

INDIAN LOSSES (PROBABLE)
All of the above, plus
1x IAF Mig29 or Su30
2x IAF officers KIA
Several military targets attacked by PAF jets

Pakistan's denial hitting IA installations is a good move. Always deny when response is more aggressive. Diplomatically good too.

Modi's gov can't make the damage of PAF strikes public, because that would mean end of his political career and utter humiliation of their forces as well.

Win win for us.

 

[R Wing]

Pakistan's denial hitting IA installations is a good move. Always deny when response is more aggressive. Diplomatically good too.

Modi's gov can't make the damage of PAF strikes public, because that would mean end of his political career and utter humiliation of their forces as well.

Win win for us.

I agree 100%.

These are the facts that BOTH sides agree on in the past week or so:
India lost 40+ paramilitary troops, 6 IAF personnel KIA & 1 captured, 1x jet down

Even if you look at solely the narrow slice of facts that India and Pakistan both acknowledge, it's like 50-0 in terms of military losses.

 

[Verve]

I agree 100%.

These are the facts that BOTH sides agree on in the past week or so:
India lost 40+ paramilitary troops, 6 IAF personnel KIA & 1 captured, 1x jet down

Even if you look at solely the narrow slice of facts that India and Pakistan both acknowledge, it's like 50-0 in terms of military losses.

Apparently 7 missiles were to be fired from IAF in retaliation and Pakistan readied with 21.

1:3 response ratio.

But international powers got involved and situation was diffused.

 

[Cookie Monster]

And, in my tally, I didn't imply that Pakistan claims them --- my tally is about losses, and those were the Indian-side losses that started this mess (due to their insanely brutal and illegal occupation of an internationally-recognized disputed territory.)

I was just having fun...my post isn't serious

 

[R Wing]

I was just having fun...my post isn't serious

Oh, I know.

But I thought it was a good opportunity to further clarify my post, haha.

 

[Whirling_dervesh]

Because we did it.

Oh yaar khuda da vaasta hi......

you will be on arnab goswami channel, news 18, star news India as conclusive proof of PAK TERROR Evidence

 

[I S I]

Oh yaar khuda da vaasta hi......

you will be on arnab goswami channel, news 18, star news India as conclusive proof of PAK TERROR Evidence

Like Hasina claimed PDF is a "Gormint" site?